Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Text of new Assault Weapons Ban introduced in Senate

Posted on 07/26/2003 6:25:39 PM PDT by conservativefromGa

Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2003 (Introduced in Senate)

S 1431 IS

108th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. 1431 To reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

July 17, 2003 Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. CORZINE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A BILL To reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2003'.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL- Section 921(a)(30) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

`(30) The term `semiautomatic assault weapon' means any of the following:

`(A) The following rifles or copies or duplicates thereof:

`(i) AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47, AK-74, ARM, MAK90, Misr, NHM 90, NHM 91, SA 85, SA 93, VEPR;

`(ii) AR-10;

`(iii) AR-15, Bushmaster XM15, Armalite M15, or Olympic Arms PCR;

`(iv) AR70;

`(v) Calico Liberty;

`(vi) Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU;

`(vii) Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR, or FNC;

`(viii) Hi-Point Carbine;

`(ix) HK-91, HK-93, HK-94, or HK-PSG-1;

`(x) Kel-Tec Sub Rifle;

`(xi) M1 Carbine;

`(xii) Saiga;

`(xiii) SAR-8, SAR-4800;

`(xiv) SKS with detachable magazine;

`(xv) SLG 95;

`(xvi) SLR 95 or 96;

`(xvii) Steyr AUG;

`(xviii) Sturm, Ruger Mini-14;

`(xix) Tavor;

`(xx) Thompson 1927, Thompson M1, or Thompson 1927 Commando; or

`(xxi) Uzi, Galil and Uzi Sporter, Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle (Galatz).

`(B) The following pistols or copies or duplicates thereof:

`(i) Calico M-110;

`(ii) MAC-10, MAC-11, or MPA3;

`(iii) Olympic Arms OA;

`(iv) TEC-9, TEC-DC9, TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10; or

`(v) Uzi.

`(C) The following shotguns or copies or duplicates thereof:

`(i) Armscor 30 BG;

`(ii) SPAS 12 or LAW 12;

`(iii) Striker 12; or

`(iv) Streetsweeper.

`(D) A semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine, and that has--

`(i) a folding or telescoping stock;

`(ii) a threaded barrel;

`(iii) a pistol grip;

`(iv) a forward grip; or

`(v) a barrel shroud.

`(E)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), a semiautomatic rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.

`(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.

`(F) A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine, and has--

`(i) a second pistol grip;

`(ii) a threaded barrel;

`(iii) a barrel shroud; or

`(iv) the capacity to accept a detachable magazine at a location outside of the pistol grip.

`(G) A semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.

`(H) A semiautomatic shotgun that has--

`(i) a folding or telescoping stock;

`(ii) a pistol grip;

`(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine; or

`(iv) a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds.

`(I) A shotgun with a revolving cylinder.

`(J) A frame or receiver that is identical to, or based substantially on the frame or receiver of, a firearm described in any of subparagraphs (A) through (I) or (L).

`(K) A conversion kit.

`(L) A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.'.

(b) RELATED DEFINITIONS- Section 921(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:

`(36) BARREL SHROUD- The term `barrel shroud' means a shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel of a firearm so that the shroud protects the user of the firearm from heat generated by the barrel, but does not include a slide that encloses the barrel, and does not include an extension of the stock along the bottom of the barrel which does not encircle or substantially encircle the barrel.

`(37) CONVERSION KIT- The term `conversion kit' means any part or combination of parts designed and intended for use in converting a firearm into a semiautomatic assault weapon, and any combination of parts from which a semiautomatic assault weapon can be assembled if the parts are in the possession or under the control of a person.

`(38) DETACHABLE MAGAZINE- The term `detachable magazine' means an ammunition feeding device that can readily be inserted into a firearm.

`(39) FIXED MAGAZINE- The term `fixed magazine' means an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm.

`(40) FOLDING OR TELESCOPING STOCK- The term `folding or telescoping stock' means a stock that folds, telescopes, or otherwise operates to reduce the length, size, or any other dimension, or otherwise enhances the concealability, of a firearm.

`(41) FORWARD GRIP- The term `forward grip' means a grip located forward of the trigger that functions as a pistol grip.

`(42) PISTOL GRIP- The term `pistol grip' means a grip, a thumbhole stock, or any other characteristic that can function as a grip.

`(43) THREADED BARREL- The term `threaded barrel' means a feature or characteristic that is designed in such a manner to allow for the attachment of a firearm as defined in section 5845(a) of the National Firearms Act (26 U.S.C. 5845(a)).'.

SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF SUNSET.

Section 110105 of the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Protection Act is amended--

(1) by striking `--' and all that follows through `(1)'; and

(2) by striking `; and' and all that follows through `that date'.

SEC. 4. GRANDFATHER PROVISIONS.

Section 922(v)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--

(1) by inserting `(A)' after `(2)';

(2) by striking `on the date of the enactment of this subsection' and inserting `as of September 13, 1994'; and

(3) by adding after and below the end the following:

`(B) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any firearm the possession or transfer of which would (but for this subparagraph) be unlawful by reason of this subsection, and which is otherwise lawfully possessed on the date of the enactment of this subparagraph.'.

SEC. 5. REPEAL OF CERTAIN EXEMPTIONS.

Section 922(v)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking `(3)' and all that follows through the end of the first sentence and inserting the following:

`(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any firearm that--

`(A) is manually operated by bolt, pump, level, or slide action;

`(B) has been rendered permanently inoperable; or

`(C) is an antique firearm.'.

SEC. 6. REQUIRING BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR THE TRANSFER OF LAWFULLY POSSESSED SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS.

Section 922(v) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

`(5) It shall be unlawful for any person to transfer a semiautomatic assault weapon to which paragraph (1) does not apply, except through--

`(A) a licensed dealer, and for purposes of subsection (t) in the case of such a transfer, the weapon shall be considered to be transferred from the business inventory of the licensed dealer and the dealer shall be considered to be the transferor; or

`(B) a State or local law enforcement agency if the transfer is made in accordance with the procedures provided for in subsection (t) of this section and section 923(g).

`(6) The Attorney General shall establish and maintain, in a timely manner, a record of the make, model, and date of manufacture of any semiautomatic assault weapon which the Attorney General is made aware has been used in relation to a crime under Federal or State law, and the nature and circumstances of the crime involved, including the outcome of relevant criminal investigations and proceedings. The Attorney General shall annually submit the record to the Congress and make the record available to the general public.'.

SEC. 7. STRENGTHENING THE BAN ON THE POSSESSION OR TRANSFER OF A LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICE.

(a) BAN ON TRANSFER OF SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPON WITH LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICE-

(1) IN GENERAL- Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the following:

`(z) It shall be unlawful for any person to transfer any assault weapon with a large capacity ammunition feeding device.'.

(2) PENALTIES- Section 924(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

`(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(z) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.'.

(b) CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT-

(1) IN GENERAL- Section 922(w) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--

(A) in paragraph (2), by striking `on or before the date of enactment of this subsection' and inserting `in the United States on or before September 13, 1994';

(B) in paragraph (3)--

(i) by adding `or' at the end of subparagraph (B); and

(ii) by striking subparagraph (C) and redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (C); and

(C) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following:

`(4) It shall be unlawful for a licensed manufacturer, licensed importer, or licensed dealer who transfers a large capacity ammunition feeding device that was manufactured on or before September 13, 1994, to fail to certify to the Attorney General before the end of the 60-day period that begins with the date of the transfer, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Attorney General, that the device was manufactured on or before September 13, 1994.'.

(2) PENALTIES- Section 924(a) of title 18, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a)(2), is further amended by adding at the end the following:

`(9) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(w)(4) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.'.

SEC. 8. UNLAWFUL WEAPONS TRANSFERS TO JUVENILES.

Section 922(x) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--

(1) in paragraph (1)--

(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and

(B) by adding at the end the following:

`(C) a semiautomatic assault weapon; or

`(D) a large capacity ammunition feeding device.'; and

(2) in paragraph (2)--

(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and

(B) by adding at the end the following:

`(C) a semiautomatic assault weapon; or

`(D) a large capacity ammunition feeding device.'.

SEC. 9. BAN ON IMPORTATION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICE.

(a) IN GENERAL- Section 922(w) of title 18, United States Code, as amended by section 7(b)(1), is further amended--

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking `(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2)' and inserting `(1)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B)';

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking `(2) Paragraph (1)' and inserting `(B) Subparagraph (A)'; and

(3) by inserting before paragraph (3) the following:

`(2) It shall be unlawful for any person to import or bring into the United States a large capacity ammunition feeding device.'.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Section 921(a)(31)(A) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking `manufactured after the date of enactment of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994'.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-186 next last

1 posted on 07/26/2003 6:25:39 PM PDT by conservativefromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
Given as many legislators voted to keep us in the UN
wonder how many will support this at the 11th hour?
Bump
2 posted on 07/26/2003 6:29:35 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
I can't believe I have to reside in the state these a$$holes hail from. . I wish they would just disappear with the rest of the crazy Demorats . The worst part is the vote for lautencadaver . I am surrounded by idiots in this State of Confusion .
3 posted on 07/26/2003 6:30:09 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
Wait till all the combat vets come back from fighting for the freedom of Iraqis only to find out that their leaders will have sold them out to the criminals of their homeland

Allowed to carry a machine gun grenade launcher etc to free Iraqis they will be jailed for keeping a rifle or handgun to defend their own families from murderers rapists thieves
or even from the very same terrorists they fought in Iraq who have invaded through wide open borders...

We Are Governed By Traitors in high places
4 posted on 07/26/2003 6:36:45 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
We Are Governed By Traitors in high places

//////////
And to think that many of us are actually sworn to defend the Constitution against ALL ENEMIES, foreign or DOMESTIC . . . .

We have done a lousy job of defending our Constitution from these creeps, I would say.
5 posted on 07/26/2003 6:42:31 PM PDT by BenR2 ((John 3:16: Still True Today.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
Apparently, these guys think Amendment Two is a joke.
6 posted on 07/26/2003 6:44:17 PM PDT by BenR2 ((John 3:16: Still True Today.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
the right of the people SHALL NOT be infringed. (unless some people want to)??????
Whatever happened to the law that all new bills have to cite where in the constitution they are derived?
7 posted on 07/26/2003 6:44:38 PM PDT by chuckwalla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
My only comment is that if this thing gets to Bush's desk, and he signs it--he will have gotten his last vote from me!
8 posted on 07/26/2003 6:44:48 PM PDT by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
Other sponsors? I'm sure Chuckie from NY is one. Who else?

vaudine
9 posted on 07/26/2003 6:48:31 PM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
Is this the ban extension that the president endorsed or is this one that he claimed to be for so he could pander for more votes and then claim amnesia after the tv cameras were turned off?
--Raoul
10 posted on 07/26/2003 6:48:40 PM PDT by RDangerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: basil
My only comment is that if this thing gets to Bush's desk, and he signs it--he will have gotten his last vote from me!
I strongly agree, but I can't imagine that this bill will make it past the House.
11 posted on 07/26/2003 6:51:09 PM PDT by gsrinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gsrinok
It will make it.
12 posted on 07/26/2003 6:53:31 PM PDT by JOHANNES801
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
Rest assured, there will be a well-publicized shooting with a semi-automatic rifle while this bill is being debated. Take it to the bank.
13 posted on 07/26/2003 6:54:19 PM PDT by AF68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckwalla
It appears that we need to let our legislators learn an old Western phrase that is not used as often as it needs to be -

"Get a rope!"
14 posted on 07/26/2003 6:54:54 PM PDT by My dog Sam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
`(L) A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.'.

That's a total ban if a bad AG comes in.

I will not vote for anyone that backs this. Period.

15 posted on 07/26/2003 6:56:18 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("If it feels good, Do It! Don't Think Twice!" - Lynyrd Skynyrd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
My only comment is that if this thing gets to Bush's desk, and he signs it--he will have gotten his last vote from me!

I have to agree. This is MY litmus test!

16 posted on 07/26/2003 6:58:42 PM PDT by Brian S ("Mount up everybody and ride to the sound of the gun!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
OK, I read the whole thing.

What's the point of it, and why would anyone support it?

17 posted on 07/26/2003 6:59:56 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
Bang
18 posted on 07/26/2003 7:06:12 PM PDT by Beelzebubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
I most stongly object; the Dragonov is in no way an"assault rifle."

It is, instead, a dreaded "sniper rifle."

And a damn good one, at that.

19 posted on 07/26/2003 7:08:36 PM PDT by patton (I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
'Don't Be A Menace'

Funniest movie I've seen in a long time.

When the one goofy Wayan asks 'Do these Nikes go good with the TEC9?'

20 posted on 07/26/2003 7:10:51 PM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
"We Are Governed By Traitors in high places"

They are also known as the Republicrats.
21 posted on 07/26/2003 7:11:24 PM PDT by HadEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: basil
My only comment is that if this thing gets to Bush's desk, and he signs it--he will have gotten his last vote from me!

///////////
I hope it doesn't get to his desk, then . . . .

Because, if it does, I believe that Karl (Marx) Rove will advise him to sign it in order to "triangulate the Democratic vote."
22 posted on 07/26/2003 7:16:30 PM PDT by BenR2 ((John 3:16: Still True Today.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
`(42) PISTOL GRIP- The term `pistol grip' means a grip, a thumbhole stock, or any other characteristic that can function as a grip.

With this innoucous langauge, along with the change from requiring two bad features for banning to just one, they will have banned all semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines and all semi-auto shotguns, except those with 5 round or less capacity magazines. For the shotguns they'll probably count by using those stubby little shells from Aguela, about 1.5 inches, so a gun designed to hold 3 rounds of 3" shell will be over the top, and thus banned.

And how is this for Orwellian doublespeak:

") A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.'.

Notice that since the shotguns procured for the military are usually modifications of civilian designs, or sometimes not modifications at all, many semi-auto shotguns not caught up by the "pistol grip" criteria, will be caught up by the "military" criteria. Hope all the sporting clays shooters and the bird hunters take note.

This is the campanion bill to one introduced in the House quite some time ago. The provisions seem identical. It may actually be the sacrificial lamb that the Gun Grabbers will offer up for the "more reasonable" version which merely makes permanent the current Ugly Gun Ban, and also bans import of >10 round magazines, regardles of when manufactured.

23 posted on 07/26/2003 7:18:14 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
My only comment is that if this thing gets to Bush's desk, and he signs it--he will have gotten his last vote from me!

Agree, and I'll add that to congress and well.

24 posted on 07/26/2003 7:18:31 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("If it feels good, Do It! Don't Think Twice!" - Lynyrd Skynyrd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: basil
What did you do during the last election so it won't reach his desk?
25 posted on 07/26/2003 7:21:57 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
I believe that Karl (Marx) Rove will advise him to sign it in order to "triangulate the Democratic vote."

He'll need every one of them too. The Repubs will abandon him by the millions.

26 posted on 07/26/2003 7:23:06 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa; *bang_list; Travis McGee; Jeff Head; SLB; Eaker; wardaddy; TexasCowboy; ...
BTTT.......
27 posted on 07/26/2003 7:25:06 PM PDT by Squantos (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton
I don't think this item exists:

(I) A shotgun with a revolving cylinder.

I guess public safety demands the banning of imaginary weapons too.
28 posted on 07/26/2003 7:26:46 PM PDT by Threepwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gsrinok
I can't imagine that this bill will make it past the House.

The virtually identical H.R.2038 was introduced in earlly May in the House by Rep Carolyn McCarthy, with 97 co-sponsers, including the traitor in whose district I reside! (He inherited the seat from his father, for whom half the public buildings in town built in the last 50 years, seem to be named, so I'd say his hold on the seat is pretty solid, unless re-districting gets him. I can only hope. )

29 posted on 07/26/2003 7:28:25 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Threepwood
A "street sweeper" was a shotgun with a revolving cylnder. Its the only one I can think of.
30 posted on 07/26/2003 7:28:27 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Threepwood
I believe, though could be mistaken, that the "street-sweeper" is such a gun.
31 posted on 07/26/2003 7:28:38 PM PDT by Brian S ("Mount up everybody and ride to the sound of the gun!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
An M1 carbine? Surely they jest!

Exactly what the bloody hell is a Large Capacity Ammuntion Feeding Device? Is my .22 rifle with a tubular magazine that will hold 15 rounds such?

These bugs need to be stepped on and ground into the pavement.
32 posted on 07/26/2003 7:30:45 PM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I noticed my jerkoff SINator Carl Lenin cosponsored the other AW ban in the senate. Feinswine's ban.

Don't blame me....I voted for Rocky.

33 posted on 07/26/2003 7:32:00 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("If it feels good, Do It! Don't Think Twice!" - Lynyrd Skynyrd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
Anyone who thinks this bill is a violation of their Constitutional rights has the OBLIGATION to contact his/her Senator AND Congressman and remind the individuals that they work for US, not the other way around.

For a group of people who swore to "...protect and defend the Constitution...from all enemies" they sure are doing their damndest to infringe my right to keep and bear arms.

Let these bastards know that a vote for this bill is a vote for them to be unemployed next November.

34 posted on 07/26/2003 7:38:06 PM PDT by WestPacSailor (Exercise your right to vote, or they'll take that one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Thanks for the ping, Squantos........I think.
I'm concerned about this one.
I think it will make it to the President's desk, and I think he will sign it.......like he said he would.
35 posted on 07/26/2003 7:42:58 PM PDT by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
My only comment is that if this thing gets to Bush's desk, and he signs it--he will have gotten his last vote from me!

Ditto me too, but I do not think it is going to happen. Evidence.

The NRA is now soliciting funds specifically to fight this bill and they are about six months behind GOA getting started.

Politicians are well aware of the 1994 blood bath that decimated the democrap party and know that NRA membership is higher than ever.

If you read all the gun bills introduced this year you will notice that some progun bills have been introduced by conservative democraps. They fear the ballot box, big time.

The list of guns to be banned is expanded and millions of shooters and gun owners will find their favorite piece on the list.

The letters have been pouring into politicians since the white house spokes person said Dubya would sign a assault weapons bill.

The high capacity magazines that never really became unavailable have recently been marked down up to 30% by some sellers. Anyone who stocked up on these items is going to have to sell them below cost before long.

That's the writing on the wall, the way I read it. In any case a lady at the RNC called the other day asking for donations. I politiely explained to her that all my dontations were going to NRA and GOA until this assault weapons bill issue was resolved. She then mentioned that we could get stuck with another eight years of someone like Bill Clinton, and would I allow a single issue get in the way and let this occur. I told her, "oh yes I could, have a good day, click."

36 posted on 07/26/2003 7:45:24 PM PDT by SSN558 (Be on the lookout for Black White-Supremacists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: vaudine
Other sponsors? I'm sure Chuckie from NY is one. Who else?
only one in the Senate so far..... Corzine

The question is does it have support in the Judiciary committee to have a hearing and be voted out favorably for Senate action. If Hatch doesn't bring it up then it will die a dead there.....

The companion bill in the House has the following co-sponsors......

H.R.2038
Title: To reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep McCarthy, Carolyn [NY-4] (introduced 5/8/2003)      Cosponsors: 97
Related Bills: S.1431
Latest Major Action: 6/25/2003 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.


COSPONSORS(97), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]:     (Sort: by date)

Rep Abercrombie, Neil - 6/16/2003 [HI-1] Rep Ackerman, Gary L. - 5/8/2003 [NY-5]
Rep Andrews, Robert E. - 5/8/2003 [NJ-1] Rep Becerra, Xavier - 7/24/2003 [CA-31]
Rep Berman, Howard L. - 7/24/2003 [CA-28] Rep Bishop, Timothy H. - 5/8/2003 [NY-1]
Rep Blumenauer, Earl - 5/8/2003 [OR-3] Rep Brady, Robert - 5/8/2003 [PA-1]
Rep Brown, Corrine - 5/8/2003 [FL-3] Rep Capps, Lois - 5/19/2003 [CA-23]
Rep Capuano, Michael E. - 5/8/2003 [MA-8] Rep Cardin, Benjamin L. - 6/3/2003 [MD-3]
Rep Carson, Julia - 5/8/2003 [IN-7] Rep Case, Ed - 5/8/2003 [HI-2]
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy - 7/24/2003 [MO-1] Rep Conyers, John, Jr. - 5/8/2003 [MI-14]
Rep Crowley, Joseph - 7/17/2003 [NY-7] Rep Cummings, Elijah E. - 5/8/2003 [MD-7]
Rep Davis, Danny K. - 5/8/2003 [IL-7] Rep DeGette, Diana - 5/21/2003 [CO-1]
Rep Delahunt, William D. - 5/8/2003 [MA-10] Rep DeLauro, Rosa L. - 5/8/2003 [CT-3]
Rep Deutsch, Peter - 5/19/2003 [FL-20] Rep Emanuel, Rahm - 5/8/2003 [IL-5]
Rep Engel, Eliot L. - 5/8/2003 [NY-17] Rep Eshoo, Anna G. - 6/10/2003 [CA-14]
Rep Farr, Sam - 5/8/2003 [CA-17] Rep Fattah, Chaka - 5/8/2003 [PA-2]
Rep Filner, Bob - 7/8/2003 [CA-51] Rep Frank, Barney - 5/8/2003 [MA-4]
Rep Gonzalez, Charles A. - 7/8/2003 [TX-20] Rep Grijalva, Raul M. - 5/8/2003 [AZ-7]
Rep Gutierrez, Luis V. - 5/8/2003 [IL-4] Rep Harman, Jane - 5/8/2003 [CA-36]
Rep Hastings, Alcee L. - 7/17/2003 [FL-23] Rep Hoeffel, Joseph M. - 5/8/2003 [PA-13]
Rep Holt, Rush D. - 5/8/2003 [NJ-12] Rep Honda, Michael M. - 5/8/2003 [CA-15]
Rep Hoyer, Steny H. - 7/25/2003 [MD-5] Rep Israel, Steve - 7/15/2003 [NY-2]
Rep Jackson, Jesse L., Jr. - 5/8/2003 [IL-2] Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila - 5/8/2003 [TX-18]
Rep Johnson, Eddie Bernice - 5/8/2003 [TX-30] Rep Jones, Stephanie Tubbs - 7/24/2003 [OH-11]
Rep Kennedy, Patrick J. - 5/8/2003 [RI-1] Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. - 5/19/2003 [OH-10]
Rep Langevin, James R. - 5/8/2003 [RI-2] Rep Lantos, Tom - 5/21/2003 [CA-12]
Rep Larson, John B. - 6/3/2003 [CT-1] Rep Lee, Barbara - 5/8/2003 [CA-9]
Rep Lewis, John - 5/8/2003 [GA-5] Rep Lipinski, William O. - 5/8/2003 [IL-3]
Rep Lofgren, Zoe - 5/8/2003 [CA-16] Rep Lowey, Nita M. - 5/8/2003 [NY-18]
Rep Maloney, Carolyn B. - 5/8/2003 [NY-14] Rep Markey, Edward J. - 5/8/2003 [MA-7]
Rep Matsui, Robert T. - 7/8/2003 [CA-5] Rep McCollum, Betty - 6/16/2003 [MN-4]
Rep McDermott, Jim - 6/3/2003 [WA-7] Rep McGovern, James P. - 5/8/2003 [MA-3]
Rep Meehan, Martin T. - 5/8/2003 [MA-5] Rep Meeks, Gregory W. - 5/19/2003 [NY-6]
Rep Menendez, Robert - 5/8/2003 [NJ-13] Rep Miller, George - 5/19/2003 [CA-7]
Rep Moran, James P. - 5/8/2003 [VA-8] Rep Nadler, Jerrold - 5/8/2003 [NY-8]
Rep Norton, Eleanor Holmes - 5/8/2003 [DC] Rep Olver, John W. - 5/21/2003 [MA-1]
Rep Owens, Major R. - 5/8/2003 [NY-11] Rep Pascrell, Bill, Jr. - 5/8/2003 [NJ-8]
Rep Payne, Donald M. - 5/8/2003 [NJ-10] Rep Rangel, Charles B. - 5/8/2003 [NY-15]
Rep Rothman, Steve R. - 5/8/2003 [NJ-9] Rep Roybal-Allard, Lucille - 5/8/2003 [CA-34]
Rep Rush, Bobby L. - 5/8/2003 [IL-1] Rep Sanchez, Linda T. - 5/8/2003 [CA-39]
Rep Sanchez, Loretta - 5/8/2003 [CA-47] Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. - 5/8/2003 [IL-9]
Rep Schiff, Adam B. - 7/17/2003 [CA-29] Rep Serrano, Jose E. - 6/10/2003 [NY-16]
Rep Shays, Christopher - 5/8/2003 [CT-4] Rep Sherman, Brad - 5/21/2003 [CA-27]
Rep Slaughter, Louise McIntosh - 6/23/2003 [NY-28] Rep Smith, Christopher H. - 5/8/2003 [NJ-4]
Rep Solis, Hilda L. - 5/8/2003 [CA-32] Rep Stark, Fortney Pete - 5/8/2003 [CA-13]
Rep Tauscher, Ellen O. - 5/8/2003 [CA-10] Rep Tierney, John F. - 5/8/2003 [MA-6]
Rep Towns, Edolphus - 5/8/2003 [NY-10] Rep Van Hollen, Chris - 5/8/2003 [MD-8]
Rep Velazquez, Nydia M. - 5/8/2003 [NY-12] Rep Waters, Maxine - 5/8/2003 [CA-35]
Rep Watson, Diane E. - 5/8/2003 [CA-33] Rep Waxman, Henry A. - 5/8/2003 [CA-30]
Rep Weiner, Anthony D. - 5/8/2003 [NY-9] Rep Wexler, Robert - 5/8/2003 [FL-19]
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. - 5/8/2003 [CA-6]

37 posted on 07/26/2003 7:45:42 PM PDT by deport (On a hot day don't kick a cow chip...... only democrat enablers..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy
I have been a thorn in my congress critters ass on this cosmetic source of revenue shit 'n'shineola show called the AW ban all along......

Gonna be an on going battle till we die I believe so I may as well settle in for the long fight with these seditious polidiots and presstitutes.

Stay Safe TC !

38 posted on 07/26/2003 7:50:16 PM PDT by Squantos (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Threepwood
I don't think this item exists: (I) A shotgun with a revolving cylinder. I guess public safety demands the banning of imaginary weapons too.

It does. One version was called the Street Sweeper, another the Stryer 12. However they have been reclassified as "destructive devices", being shotguns "not particular suitable for sporting purposes". Even those who owned them before that, were/are required to register them as with a machine gun, but without the $200 tax, until you want to sell it, then the new buyer must pay the tax, and jump through the other NFA hoops.

39 posted on 07/26/2003 7:52:21 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Threepwood
Here's a pic of the streetsweeper:


40 posted on 07/26/2003 8:03:31 PM PDT by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SSN558
"The NRA is now soliciting funds specifically to fight this bill and they are about six months behind GOA getting started.

You're not even close. The NRA was sending members to work at the pro-gun candidate's offices during the last election. They advertised the fact the last election would elect the politicians who would vote on the Assault Weapons Bill.

41 posted on 07/26/2003 8:04:54 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
Letter just went out to our Governor, A.G., US Senators, US Reps, The Prez - with copies to all newspapers in my area:

Any more assaults AGAINST the Constitution of the United States and the people of the United States of America by TREASONOUS cowards will be dealt with.

I swore an oath to protect this nation against ALL enemies both foreign AND DOMESTIC. I will obey my oath.

WILL YOU?
42 posted on 07/26/2003 8:05:24 PM PDT by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Threepwood
I don't think this item exists: (I) A shotgun with a revolving cylinder.

Here's one:


43 posted on 07/26/2003 8:10:01 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: My dog Sam
yep.
44 posted on 07/26/2003 8:10:58 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
I fell for his blarney, I suppose. I heard him say that he was pro 2A, and though I don't remember that he ever precisely mentioned the "Assault Weapons Ban", per se he made several comments during the campaign that would lead one to believe that we were electing a person who supported the 2A.

Also, it was during his governorship in TX that he signed the conceal and carry law here.

45 posted on 07/26/2003 8:11:36 PM PDT by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Threepwood
Here is another picture of a Street Sweeper and a Striker:


46 posted on 07/26/2003 8:12:30 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: conservativefromGa
This bill is so outrageous
Thats probably a good thing
no one in there right (conservative) mind having any further political ambition would vote for it
(except for dems of course)
47 posted on 07/26/2003 8:15:15 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
Welll, I could say that I voted Republican so that Senator elected would vote against this bill. However the RINO 'annointed' as 'our' candidate by the RNC here in North Carolina had already publicly stated over two years ago she is anti 2A. So who was I supposed to vote for?
48 posted on 07/26/2003 8:15:32 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Flint
Exactly what the bloody hell is a Large Capacity Ammuntion Feeding Device? Is my .22 rifle with a tubular magazine that will hold 15 rounds such?

No, but only because it's specifically exempted in the definition. If it held .17WMR or anything other than .22 rimfire, it would be included. I don't know if any of the various Winchester and other lever actions in .357 and .44 can hold more than 10 rounds or not, but if they do, their tube falls under the definition. From USC Title 18 Sec. 921

(31)

The term ''large capacity ammunition feeding device'' -

(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device manufactured after the date of enactment of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but

(B)

does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.

49 posted on 07/26/2003 8:17:44 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: basil
I always hear the same story. What someone won't do.

What did you do during the last election so he won't sign the bill?

Did you help get more pro-gun Congressman so it won't reach his desk?

Did you work for a pro-gun Senator so we can try to get a pro-gun majority?

Do you belong to a gun group so they can lobby this thing out of existance?

The person you voted for said that we have enought gun laws and don't need any more but he would sign the Assault Weapons Bill. That's who you voted for.
50 posted on 07/26/2003 8:19:59 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson