Posted on 07/27/2003 9:23:29 PM PDT by DPB101
Orrin Hatch has a thing for timing. The same day this month that a Virginia court moved the trial of Washington sniper suspect John Allen Muhammad far from the city he allegedly terrorized last fall, the Republican senator from Utah decided it was time to loosen up gun restrictions in the nation's capital.
The District's 1976 law bans handguns (designed only for killing people), requires firearm and ammunition registration and prohibits guns in the workplace. Hatch wants to loosen all these public safety restrictions while redefining "machine gun" to boot.
What's notable here is that Hatch is no exception. He is behaving exactly like the Utah Legislature and 18 other statehouses that have aggressively weakened public safety laws in this calendar year alone.
This represents an extraordinary reversal of fortune for the country, whose gun-related murder rate has plummeted with tighter firearm restrictions imposed during the early 1990s.
More important to those concerned about domestic security and home rule, most of these rollbacks are specifically targeted at much tougher city ordinances that keep deadly firearms off urban streets, where they are more likely to be used to terrorize citizens or shoot cops.
For months this quiet campaign, backed by the National Rifle Association (NRA), has simmered at the state level without boiling over into national debate, where gun-waving is still too risky for a closely divided Congress.
So the stealthy state-level crusade has made fast, alarming reversals. West Virginia and Arkansas recently exempted firearm makers from product liability. Alaska, Arizona, Delaware, Maine, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and Utah enacted "reciprocity" laws, allowing legally permitted citizens to cross their state line fully armed.
Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Indiana, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah enacted concealed-weapons laws, allowing more people to carry weapons virtually anywhere undetected.
In case the laws' intent were unclear to some cities, Arkansas, Colorado, Maine and Virginia enacted "pre-emption" laws to blunt municipal gun restrictions. Utah has a similar law.
Such a top-down power play by statehouses too far removed from urban reality is matched only by Hatch's federal mandate to inundate violence-weary District residents with more cheap, deadly guns.
He's doing us no favors, and neither are his NRA-backed allies across the country. Without tight restrictions on deadly, unregulated weapons of mass death, we will careen back to the body counts of the 1980s.
We have 10 years of evidence that the solution to gun violence in Washington -- or Denver, Minneapolis, New Haven, Conn., and Memphis, Tenn. -- is not more guns, but fewer. Moreover, it is for the cities to decide. "Gun laws should be made to fit the needs of individual communities," said Denver District Attorney Bill Ritter. "People don't want the state legislature telling them the best way to deal with . . . firearms. That should come from local governments." City residents and their municipal leaders get it because they live it. That hardly can be said for legislators like Orrin Hatch and his statehouse counterparts.
The right to bear arms is no substitute for freedom from fear.
Rita Bibbs-Daniels grew up in the District of Columbia. She is Violence Prevention Program director for Physicians for Social Responsibility.
What planet do you inhabit, little girl?
That is simply a bald faced lie!
"The right to bear arms is no substitute for freedom from fear."
Bearing arms is the solution for fear!
Whoever makes this statement is too ignorant to be writing or is an outright liar. The change in demographics (by far), tougher penalties, and, probably, concealed carry laws are what reduced gun-related murder rates.
What's this jerk's problem? If he wants gun control, you'd think he could at least have the decency to say so. "Public safety laws" grrrr
umgud: Our lowering of murders rates and crime in general had more to do with tougher penalties for said criminals, not more gun laws. How do you respond to an idiot like this? I guess you can't.Well, how do your explain a president who was given millions by the NRA for his campaign and then announced that he endorsed the Assault Weapons Ban extension. I guess you can't. Oh but that's right; he's just pandering for votes from the Soccer Moms. "Never mind, Charlton, I was just lying because that is how I'll win next time to help the NRA." Sigh. --Raoul
An armed society is a polite society. Crime rates drop where honest citizens are armed.
Amen to that! Where is Jake Garn when we need him?
Blackbart, I have an H&K .223 assault rifle that is a dream to shoot!
We have 10 years of evidence that the solution to gun violence in Washington -- or Denver, Minneapolis, New Haven, Conn., and Memphis, Tenn. -- is not more guns, but fewer. Moreover, it is for the cities to decide.
"Gun laws should be made to fit the needs of individual communities," said Denver District Attorney Bill Ritter. "People don't want the state legislature telling them the best way to deal with . . . firearms. That should come from local governments." City residents and their municipal leaders get it because they live it. That hardly can be said for legislators like Orrin Hatch and his statehouse counterparts.
The right to bear arms is no substitute for freedom from fear."
Rita Bibbs-Daniels grew up in the District of Columbia.
She is Violence Prevention Program director for Physicians for Social Responsibility.
This above statement is a willful huge lying crock.
Let former US Presiden t Bill Clinton President Bill Clinton set them straight:
301 Handgun Murders 1999
Washington DC - 100% Gun-Banned over 28 years
340,000 Population TOTAL
-V-
300 Handgun Murders 1999 COMBINED 17 States TOTALS!
17 Legal Concealed Carry States
23,000,000 Population COMBINED 17 States
SOURCE:
1999 Clinton/Reno/Freeh FBI-DOJ
Uniform Crime Report
Sent to me by:
(D-CT) US Sen. Joe Lieberman's DC Senate Staff Office
The Handgun Murder Rate in 100% Gun-Banned Washington DC is over 70 times that of 17 Legal Concealed Handgun Carry License State COMBINED!
Check this out yourself!
I post!
You double-check me!
You decide!
Should read: There is no substitute to the right to bear arms for freedom from fear.
That would be an H&K 93 if I'm not mistaken. Good weapon.
I prefer The H&K 91 however. It shoots 7.62 Nato (read that .308). I think it packs more punch.
Yea! Though I walk through The Valley Of Death, I'm armed to the teeth, so I don't fear much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.