The parasite lawyer the convinced her that she should sue the Valor Corp should be counter-sued as well. That would help deter frivolous lawsuits.
1 posted on
07/28/2003 9:54:19 AM PDT by
Pern
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: *bang_list
The phrase "turnabout is fair play" immediately comes to mind.
2 posted on
07/28/2003 9:58:17 AM PDT by
Joe Brower
("History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." - Dwight Eisenhower)
To: Pern
This is the best news I have heard in a long time. Collecting lawyers fees from the people who file frivolous lawsuits will do more to stop that than anything I can think of.
3 posted on
07/28/2003 9:58:58 AM PDT by
jim_trent
To: Pern
I agree. People who file frivolous lawsuits should have to pay the costs incurred to defend against them. The whole purpose of this suit was to drive a perfectly legal business under while making a profit. I hope Valor wins.
4 posted on
07/28/2003 9:59:02 AM PDT by
mbynack
To: Pern
Yes, there's got to be a downside for the clients & lawyers filing these ridiculous lawsuits. Right now, there's every incentive to sue and none to deter them.
(and I was the gun company, I'd go after that idiot widow's assets too; she's the one who made the ultimate decision to sue, she doesn't deserve such considerate treatment)
5 posted on
07/28/2003 10:00:08 AM PDT by
Amore
(La vita e una cagna . . .)
To: Pern
I agree that they should sue her.
6 posted on
07/28/2003 10:03:01 AM PDT by
stevio
To: Pern
I don't want to sound hard-hearted, but screw her.
To: Pern
Where you gonna find a lawyer to sue a lawyer?
8 posted on
07/28/2003 10:06:56 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: Pern
Screw her, sue her. Then let her sue the stupid laywer that told her she would win big and become rich.
To: Pern
Pam Grunow's attorney, Rebecca Larson, said the widow was worried about losing her house if she was forced by the court to reimburse the gun company Oh, but it was no problem when she wanted to put the company out of business, right? None of their employees had houses they might have lost, right? No sympathy from me. Hope she loses. A few such object lessons might be educational to some people.
To: Pern
If there are any Florida FReepers who know more about the theory of this suit, I'd like to know more.
As a general proposition, litigants in this country bear their own legal fees and expenses, win or lose. This is known as "the American Rule." In England, the loser pays the winner's fees. This is known, not surprisingly, as "the English Rule."
There are some exceptions to the American Rule that exist by court rules and statutes in various states, but they usually require that the winning party prove that the losing party's position was completely frivolous. Low as that standard might be in Freeperdom when talking about suits against gun sellers, the courts generally treat it as a pretty high hurdle. The fact that a widow might lose her home, while getting little sympathy here, will resonate in court.
I am assuming there must be some Florida statute that allows this suit in the first place. I am also assuming there must be insurance that might cover any award, otherwise why bother suing in the first place after you have disavowed any claims against her assets.
As I said, if anybody knows more about this case, I am interested.
14 posted on
07/28/2003 10:22:02 AM PDT by
blau993
(Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
To: Pern
To: Pern
Circuit Judge Jorge Labarga His is a name to remember.
16 posted on
07/28/2003 10:23:07 AM PDT by
onyx
(Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
To: Pern
Best news I've heard all day. Hope the company wins. Hope somebody (company or widow) sues slimebag lawyer (there's an oxymoron).
To: Pern
We can only hope that the NAACP and several liberal cities suffer the same fate as payment for their own frivolous lawsuits........
21 posted on
07/28/2003 10:47:49 AM PDT by
tracer
(/b>)
To: Pern
Didn't some anti-gun group supply her the lawyers or help with the legal exspenses? If so Valor Corp should sue that bunch of freaks
22 posted on
07/28/2003 11:07:09 AM PDT by
sticker
To: Pern
I would like to see the gun manufacturers be able to re-coup their legal fees, but I think this is the wrong case to do it. The widow is too sympathetic a figure. I think the cities who sue gun manufacturers and lose should have to pay.
To: Pern
You know what they say about paybacks. Time for the ambulance chaser to get theirs.
26 posted on
07/28/2003 11:31:54 AM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("If it feels good, Do It! Don't Think Twice!" - Lynyrd Skynyrd)
To: Pern
Good. I hope that he bleeds her dry.
30 posted on
07/28/2003 11:55:02 AM PDT by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: Pern
A gun distributor that won a lawsuit brought by the widow of slain Lake Worth teacher Barry Grunow wants her to pay its legal fees but won't go after her personal assets. Softies.
35 posted on
07/28/2003 12:57:21 PM PDT by
lowbridge
(You are the audience. I am the author. I outrank you! -Franz Liebkind, The Producers)
To: Pern
Two bad things about lawyer jokes
The lawyers don't think they are funny
Honest citizens don't think they are jokes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson