Margolin, for his part, says he's inclined to accept the New York imam's interpretation of the Koran, even though he admits he hasn't read any of it himself. "I haven't read the text," he said. "But even in Judaism and Christianity, there are portions of the Old and New Testament that are open to interpretation, and people who are politically left or politically right use the Bible as the authority for their positions."
Yet another worthless Mueller type. If he hasn't read the SOURCE of the jihad motivation, then he is both inept, and worse than incompetent. He is also, by virtue of his dogmatic 'haven't read it' intransigence compounding his dubious distinction by then...also without reading evidently....drawing a moral equivalent to the teachings of the Old and New Testament. I wonder if anybody has demanded that he show them precisely where in the New Testament any of the carnality and kill-your-enemies mentality is justified...by ANY verse. Period. And then, why is no one in his face? Why is Agent Margolin not being accused of being insensitive. And that he is perpetrating a 'hate-crime' for his blatant and brazen anti-christian and anti-semitic BIGOTRY?
Bump.