Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia has a plan for a pre-emtive strike against N. Korea(if it is about to use nukes)
hani.co.kr ^ | 08/01/03 | Ryu Jae-hoon

Posted on 08/01/2003 10:52:33 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; Paul Ross; Orion78; Noswad
"Ooops. Sorry. We missed. Sorry about all those people in Seoul."

Seriously, the Russians LOVE the DPRK. Good cop bad cop. They would NOT nuke the DPRK. This smells of disinfo.
21 posted on 08/01/2003 11:36:46 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Re #19

Only if N. Korea really pushes its luck and openly show working nukes. For now, Russia is still on N. Korean side.

22 posted on 08/01/2003 11:37:13 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
You've been duped. This is SVR disinfo. Designed to make you think that the Russians are not supporting the DPRK!
23 posted on 08/01/2003 11:37:26 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MattGarrett
RUSSIA hits NORTH KOREA. CHINA RETALIATES. THE US RESPONDS IN SUPPORT OF RUSSIA. IRAN TAKES ADVANTAGE AND HITS ISREAL WHICH RESPONDS. PACKISTAN, NOT WANTING TO BE CAUGHT UNAWARE, DOES A PREEMPTIVE STIKE OF INDIA - WHICH REPONDS. ADIOS MUCHACHOS.

Nay ... by the time Pakistan gets involved Gort will have incinerated planet earth ... we were warned

24 posted on 08/01/2003 11:37:56 AM PDT by clamper1797 (Conservative by nature ... Republican in Spirit ... Patriot by Heart ... and Anti Liberal BY GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Bush's policy of not giving in to NK's demands is looking better and better and better. The dominos are falling into place, and they're not falling the way Kim wanted them to.
25 posted on 08/01/2003 11:38:20 AM PDT by Califelephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elliott Gigantalope
I challenge this. I beleive this to be SVR disinfo, designed to make foolish Westerners believe that Beijing and Moscow are not pulling the strings in their "bad cop" the DPRK!
26 posted on 08/01/2003 11:38:34 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
Weapons of mass destruction ... wasn't nkorea shipping missles to iraq ?
27 posted on 08/01/2003 11:38:37 AM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
They would NOT nuke the DPRK.

The pre-emptive strike would be conventional to achieve the stated goal.

28 posted on 08/01/2003 11:38:43 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
Did you ever smell mothballs?

No, moths are viciously protective of their manhood.
29 posted on 08/01/2003 11:39:56 AM PDT by adam_az
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
It is impossible. This story has all the earmarks of SVR disinfo.
30 posted on 08/01/2003 11:40:06 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Let me rephrase this, the anti Western Kremlin would do nothing to undermine their convenient anti Western cut out the DPRK. Clear?
31 posted on 08/01/2003 11:41:40 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MattGarrett
RUSSIA hits NORTH KOREA. CHINA RETALIATES. THE US RESPONDS IN SUPPORT OF RUSSIA. IRAN TAKES ADVANTAGE AND HITS ISREAL WHICH RESPONDS. PACKISTAN, NOT WANTING TO BE CAUGHT UNAWARE, DOES A PREEMPTIVE STIKE OF INDIA - WHICH REPONDS. ADIOS MUCHACHOS.

Gee under that scenario we win...
32 posted on 08/01/2003 11:41:58 AM PDT by Kozak (" No mans life liberty or property is safe when the legislature is in session." Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
You just might be right. I don't know enough about the situation to really know. That's why I prefaced my comment with "If this is true". If you have any sources or info to share please feel free to do so.
33 posted on 08/01/2003 11:43:00 AM PDT by Elliott Jackalope (Formerly Billy_bob_bob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
Trust but verify.
34 posted on 08/01/2003 11:44:06 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Olde School
Not 100% sure about that part of your scenario.

I'm not even 25% sure of any part of that scenario.

35 posted on 08/01/2003 11:45:24 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
Re #21

I think Russia may not want nuclear N. Korea which it may not be able to control all the time. On the other hand, as long as N. Korea stays within a certain boundary, Russia is happy to help N. Korea tackle America.

36 posted on 08/01/2003 11:48:44 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I don't know how serious Russia is, but I'll bet we have a pre-emptive strike plan. North Korea is going to have to be dealt with very soon. Millions of people will die. The only question is, will Americans be among those dead? Not bloody likely!!
37 posted on 08/01/2003 11:54:26 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: TigerLikesRooster
The 11,200 ton ship carries 64 S300 ship-to-air missiles and 16 P500 ship-to-ship missiles, which can be used to attack N. Korean missile bases.

Attacking land based targets with air defence and ship to ship missles? Interesting..... :)
39 posted on 08/01/2003 12:15:26 PM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
No, moths are viciously protective of their manhood.

Wouldn't that be 'mothhood'? ;-)

40 posted on 08/01/2003 12:18:51 PM PDT by StriperSniper (Make South Korea an island)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson