Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia has a plan for a pre-emtive strike against N. Korea(if it is about to use nukes)
hani.co.kr ^ | 08/01/03 | Ryu Jae-hoon

Posted on 08/01/2003 10:52:33 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
CNS News
In contrast to the official optimism, Russian media have been speculating about possible military involvement in Korea should another war erupt.

"Russia's best response to a possible nuclear conflict on the Korean Peninsula would be a preemptive missile strike against North Korean nuclear facilities, carried out by the Russian Pacific Fleet," the country's leading daily, Izvestia, opined Thursday.

It quoted Pacific Fleet sources as saying the nuclear facilities could be destroyed using cruise missiles launched from a Russian cruiser.

Izvestia even considered the likely fallout in the event of a nuclear explosion in Korea, quoting a meteorologist as saying there would be a 70 percent chance a radioactive cloud would reach Russia's southeastern Primorie region within two to three hours.

Russian officials have also been warning of the risks ahead, with Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov saying that a deteriorating situation in Korea would "jeopardize regional security."

Last week, the official Russian Information Agency Novosti claimed that North Korea plans to declare itself a nuclear power on September 9, a holiday in that country. There has been no confirmation of this from North Korea.


41 posted on 08/01/2003 12:21:41 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
Anybody want to bet Kim Jong-Mentally is about to strategically disappear again for another month or so?
42 posted on 08/01/2003 12:27:54 PM PDT by Mmmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
How would one get their little legs apart?
43 posted on 08/01/2003 12:34:08 PM PDT by steveo (I'm so hungry I could eat at Arby's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
You try telling him that!


44 posted on 08/01/2003 12:34:44 PM PDT by adam_az
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
It will also solve our balance of trade and employment outsourcing issues.

This plan sounds like a keeper! ;)
45 posted on 08/01/2003 12:36:35 PM PDT by adam_az
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Russia intends to stop an imminent NK/SK war from getting underway... that's why it's called pre-emption.

A pre-emptive strike is one while there is a long term threat. This article basically says Russia will strike if it percieves that Korea is about tp commence a nuclear atttack. Big difference between that and the Bush doctrine.

46 posted on 08/01/2003 12:37:28 PM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Rich irony.

The original source and propagating power behind communism, now repentant and reformed, destroys its own progeny and one time staunch ally.

47 posted on 08/01/2003 12:40:54 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
Complicated issue. Did Russia clear this with China? And what will China's reaction be if they failed to tell them? The attention is what he wanted, and a promise from the US not to attack and send him food, drink, and the newest action videos. So he may have anticipated Russia's reaction and factored this into his overall plan.
48 posted on 08/01/2003 12:43:02 PM PDT by ReaganWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
Don't forget the ok from Coffee-Cake at the wasted big box on the East River.
49 posted on 08/01/2003 1:00:07 PM PDT by Napoleon Solo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Yes. But nuclear is definitely safer (for the Russians)
50 posted on 08/01/2003 1:01:25 PM PDT by playball0 (Fortune favors the bold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Also, overpopulation. However balance of trade would worsen. Hmmmm.... I can live with that.
51 posted on 08/01/2003 1:06:01 PM PDT by playball0 (Fortune favors the bold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The Kooks are running rampant today.

Maybe they come out to howl at the moon on 1 August.

Debekka's tin foil is out and now this.
52 posted on 08/01/2003 1:56:41 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (I think the Americans are serious. Bush is not like Clinton. I think this is the end," said Uday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Coming soon to World Nut Daily...
53 posted on 08/01/2003 1:59:47 PM PDT by eldoradude (Recall them all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Did you ever smell mothballs?

No, moths are viciously protective of their manhood.

Pretty clever.

54 posted on 08/01/2003 2:03:34 PM PDT by scan59 (Always remember - CNN Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: playball0
nuclear is definitely safer

I don't see how it would be safer, and it would be immorality on stilts. It would be the end of Russia as a recovering communist country, they would be come a pariah among nations forever.

55 posted on 08/01/2003 2:04:33 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Well, he wants to nuke someone, so it might as well be North Korea. He knows we would shoot back.
56 posted on 08/01/2003 2:05:58 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American Way! Toby Keith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Oh goody. I always wondered just how the thing was going to start.
57 posted on 08/01/2003 2:10:07 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I wouldn't count on the Russkies having the nerve to do it. Or their military being able to get the job done.
58 posted on 08/01/2003 2:21:35 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
"I wouldn't count on the Russkies having the nerve to do it. Or their military being able to get the job done. "

---

You've got to be kidding. The Russians have plenty of nerve. If they do something,I am also sure they will clear it with China & the US. And their military is certainly capable of taking out a pipsqueak country like N. Korea, especially since the Russians are not hampered by any political correct attitude that "no civilians should be harmed". They'll let the chips -- or weapons -- fall where they may.
59 posted on 08/01/2003 2:45:14 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
AFAIK, afaik

INTERNET ABBREVIATION FOR as far as I know: used when you believe that something is true, but you are not completely certain

thought it was yiddish !
60 posted on 08/01/2003 2:53:03 PM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson