Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Today's Free Trade is not about the Free Market
JEFFHEAD.COM ^ | 08/01/2003 | Jeff Head

Posted on 08/01/2003 2:05:33 PM PDT by Jeff Head

TODAY'S FREE TRADE IS NOT ABOUT THE FREE MARKET

We are in a very real battle in this nation and it is a battle for our heart and soul. It is spread out on many, many fronts...education, foreign policy, work ethic (individually and societally), immigration, the economy, moral values...and the list goes on.

Let's focus on the economy and one significant part of it...a major, growing part of it. Free Trade and foreign outsourcing.

I was going to entitle this article..."I used to make something"...or..."We used to make something in this country". But, I thought better of it and realized that such a statment was really focusing on the tail end of the issue as opposed to the root.

So, instead, I am simply calling it, "Today's Free Trade is not about the Free Market."

And it is so, today's Free Trade is NOT about the free market. Instead, in a very similar manner to other key issues in this battle for the heart and soul of America, what is happening is that a very craftily wordsmithed message of "Free Trade" has been put forth that people have bought into, thinking "How could anyone be against free trade? Why, isn't that all-American?".

Like with abortion, "How could anyone be against a woman's right to choose? Isn't that all American?".

In both cases, the craftily worded title has nothing remotely to do with what is actually going on.

The free market is the system our founders based our commerce on, where the intrinsic, underlying moral values of the people involved in the free market governed the equitable, free exchange of goods and services for other goods and services or currency. Sort of like John Adams said regarding the Constitution...

"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."- John Adams, Oct. 11, 1798
It is that underlying moral foundation coupled woth our liberty that made the Free Market in America the envy of the world, just like those same issues made our governmental form the envy of the world.

Well, as far as I am conerned, Adam's words could be tailored to this topic like so, ie... The Free Market was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the economy of any other.

This is a basic truth. Like our government, our free market was not supposed to be very regulated or burdened with miriad rules. The people and the companies were to use their own moral foundation to govern themselves. But, when the moral foundation is removed, you do not have what was intended for the Constitution, and you do not have a true free market.

When we use our foreign policy and economic policy to set up shop and trade with countries, societies, organizations or to implement policies that exploit their people's mercilessly, who keep them down without a hope for true liberty or freedom, who trample the moral values our own system was based upon...and when we do it knowingly, without compuction for those very underlying values, then we do not create a free market...no, that free trade has nothing whatsoever to do with, and is in no way similar to the FREE MARKET, rather, it serves to corrupt it.

Such notions, such actions are in fact wordsmithing for popularizing and putting forth a policy to drain the United States manufacturing, technological, agricultural, energy and other critical industries in order to weaken us...plain and simple...and it is working.

Based on my own travels on behalf of US firms and then later consulting for them...that is what is really happening here in my own opinion, and until we refocus as a people on that underlying moral foundation and the absolute need for it...we will continue to lose ground.

By the way, those same principles that are working at the societal level, have equal application at the personal level too...in fact, in the end it is the sum of their working at the personal level that creates the issue at the societal level.

Jeff Head
Engineering Consultant and,
Author of The Dragon's Fury Series
How current conditions could lead to World War

August 1, 2003
Emmett, Idaho


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foreignmfg; freetrade; geopoliticalrisk; landgrab; outsourcing; peterprinciple; soveriegnty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-383 next last
To: Texas_Dawg
A nation's policy should not be based exclusively on the ability of the consumer to buy cheaper goods. It has to also consider the economic well-being and capabilities of the country.
41 posted on 08/01/2003 2:54:09 PM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
Would you drop a nuclear bomb on China right now if it was up to you?

I notice you can't really say "No" to this question. Or at least, you haven't yet.

42 posted on 08/01/2003 2:54:47 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg ("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
Blatent is right: Protectionist Backlash Against Outsourcing

This is basically India's current play book for "dealing" with an offshoring backlash.

43 posted on 08/01/2003 2:55:43 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
That's odd... I seem to be doing just fine. Same goes for 99.999% of Americans I know.

You don't know many people. It doesn't matter what is going on with a handful of well-off elites, what matters is what is happening to a large percentage of the people, the number of people who have worked all their lives successfully who are now losing jobs or working for $6 an hour instead of $15 an hour.

44 posted on 08/01/2003 2:56:16 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: exnavy
That is not a simple question, to demand a one word answer to such a complex question is like wearing a " kick me " sign on your back.

"Would you drop a nuclear bomb on China today (meaning, right now, August 1st, 2003) if you had the chance?" is a complex question?

45 posted on 08/01/2003 2:56:28 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg ("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Nice summation Jeff.
46 posted on 08/01/2003 2:57:21 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Bump for later read and post
47 posted on 08/01/2003 2:57:56 PM PDT by Sparta (A liberal is a conservative minus logic and morals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
the number of people who have worked all their lives successfully who are now losing jobs or working for $6 an hour instead of $15 an hour.

Percentage-wise, this number is very, very small, historically. If you are looking for a government that guarantees you a job, maybe you should move to Cuba.

48 posted on 08/01/2003 2:58:02 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg ("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Would you drop a nuclear bomb on China right now if it was up to you?

I'll answer your question: No...I would drop lots of them.

49 posted on 08/01/2003 2:58:14 PM PDT by TopDog2 (Deer are the spawn of satan! Wipe them out!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cacophonous
A nation's policy should not be based exclusively on the ability of the consumer to buy cheaper goods. It has to also consider the economic well-being and capabilities of the country.

I agree.

50 posted on 08/01/2003 2:58:53 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg ("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Just like myself ---right now I have two jobs ---but how does that help the high number of people being laid off from one job? In this area welfare rates approach 40%, unemployment is double digit ----so me boasting about how great I've got it would be totally silly ----it's what is going on all around me that indicates something is wrong. Should it be this bad when we elected a Republican President, Republican Congress, Republican Senate and many Republican governors?
51 posted on 08/01/2003 2:59:13 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Read the rest of my reply at 13 and you will have your answer.
52 posted on 08/01/2003 3:00:02 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Maybe it would help if you told us where you are going with this. It's more than curiosity; you've got a point to make. So make it.
53 posted on 08/01/2003 3:00:25 PM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Exactly.
54 posted on 08/01/2003 3:00:27 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
I was looking for a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. I wasn't looking for a government of the Chinese and Indian people, for those people etc. Our politicians need to concern themselves with the fate of Americans, not just the fate of the greedy few.
55 posted on 08/01/2003 3:01:09 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Old dawg no new tricks?
56 posted on 08/01/2003 3:01:20 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
The killing of millions of humans, no matter the race is not something taken lightly.
57 posted on 08/01/2003 3:02:04 PM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Should it be this bad when we elected a Republican President, Republican Congress, Republican Senate and many Republican governors?

In a cyclical economic downturn during a world war, it should be much, much worse (and throughout history has been).

58 posted on 08/01/2003 3:03:44 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg ("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
Percentage-wise, this number is very, very small, historically.

It's not as small as you seem to think, and it's the type of lay offs that are alarming. Factory lay offs have always been fairly common, temporary or seasonal. When our government is trying to shut down our means of production, we're headed in the wrong direction ---you can't easily rebuild some of this after they've destroyed it.

59 posted on 08/01/2003 3:03:47 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
This is going to be "the issue" in the 2004 election, not terrorism.

Philosophically, I have been a "free trader" all along, figuring that things would work themselves out over time like the "Japanese Car Scare" of the 70's. Thanks to the Japanese, Detroit got off it's collective butt and started making some quality cars for a decent price. We'd still be driving 4000# chrome-plated behemoths that lasted for 80,000 miles were it not for the Japanese. That's the way I figured this Chinese thing would go.

So I was willing to wait for...say...ten years for the Americans, Chinese and Mexicans to go through the same readjustment: Earn lots of money selling stuff to America so they could start buying the things that we made. Right now, it seems that is never going to happen. The things that America produces are slapped with prohibitively-expensive tariffs just about everywhere (50% tariff on beef in Japan?)

Now I am getting scared.

American can't "bring up" the rest of the world economically - the cost is just too much, even if that were the goal.

I am starting to see that the goal is to "bring down" America, rather than to "bring up" the rest of the world.

Unfortunately, our current president seems to be part of the problem, not part of the solution.

60 posted on 08/01/2003 3:05:08 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-383 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson