Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Butting in on fashion: Gen-X sinks to new lows
Houston Chronicle ^ | August 3, 2003 | MICHELLE MALKIN

Posted on 08/03/2003 9:42:49 AM PDT by Dog Gone

How low can we go? I am talking, of course, about today's waistbands.

If you thought the belly-baring thing was bad enough, take a good look at the sartorial depths to which fashion has now sunk. The Los Angeles Times last week declared it "the summer of the pelvic bone." Last year's already obscene low-riders have gone the way of high-water polyester pants.

Today's hip-huggers have almost nothing but hope to hang onto anymore. The "normal" inseam-to-waist rise of 8 to 9 inches is shrinking faster than Britney Spears' record sales. To wit, Levi's has introduced a new line of jeans called "Too Superlow" for women. Upping the ante, or should I say lowering it, the teenage-girl brand Gasoline markets "Down2There" -- adjustable low-rise jeans with a built-in bungee cord designed to help the wearer drop her pants to even nastier nadirs.

Canadian teen singer Avril Lavigne's perilously sagging pants are a global youth phenomenon. "My butt crack showing is like my trademark," she gracefully explained to a music reporter. Salon.com writer Janelle Brown approves: "(T)he butt crack is the new cleavage, reclaimed to peek seductively from the pants of supermodels and commoners alike."

The late Sen. and social critic Daniel Patrick Moynihan's famous phrase "Defining deviancy down" has taken on a whole new meaning.

Grown-ups, be forewarned: Avril's fashion nonsense is seeping into other markets. Levi's recently launched a "Dangerously Low" line for men. Another of its low-rise men's lines is dubbed, appropriately enough, "Offender." Actor Brad Pitt has popularized the Diesel brand low-risers. Toronto-based writer Jim Oldfield says the trend has overwhelmed mainstream men's stores and orders are already piling up for the fall. One Canadian merchant helpfully advised Oldfield that hip men are wearing the jeans commando-style.

In other words: "Underwear is, like, not required."

Even expectant women can't escape these drooping duds. Popular young actress and mom-to-be Kate Hudson has been photographed parading around in low-rise cargo pants and toddler-sized crop tops to show off her growing belly. At a recent trip to my neighborhood mall's maternity store, the only jeans in my size were ridiculous low-risers with flared bottoms that needed hiking every time I exhaled.

Trust me: This nouveau plumber's crack chic does not look any better on the overweight guy crouching under your kitchen sink than it does on a six-months-pregnant lady trying to bend over to pick up her toddler without mooning the world.

What will it take to convince the current cohort of exhibitionistas that sleaze is not sexy -- that less is not always more, that low is low-class? If Generation X-rated can't be persuaded to cover up out of moral necessity, perhaps they will listen to medical authority. A warning about the health hazards of low-rise pants was published in the Canadian Medical Association six months ago. According to Dr. Malvinder Parmar, a painful condition called "meralgia paresthetica" is causing wearers of hip-huggers to experience "tingling or a burning sensation" in the thighs.

Dr. Parmar's treatment: four to six weeks in -- the horror! -- loose-fitting dresses. Must have been worse than swallowing cod liver oil.

Avril and Britney and Brad need to show their fans that a little extra fabric is not a death sentence. The late Kate Hepburn melted hearts while fully clothed in turtlenecks and roomy, belted trousers. She was a "hottie" who showed us her cheekbones, and left the rest where it should be left: to the imagination.

Alas, modesty has been long out of vogue. But it's a fashion rule of thumb that what's out eventually becomes in. The day when "clothed is the new naked" can't come soon enough.

Malkin is a nationally syndicated columnist based in North Bethesda, Md. malkin@comcast.net


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: fashion; genx; michellemalkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: Donna Rumsfeld
Our taxes are going to be so high when they retire.

So true. And there's a gadzillion of them in number to support!

81 posted on 08/03/2003 10:12:00 PM PDT by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Though I am sure after they are done with fast food that will be coming soon

True. Now that they are getting older and are having to watch their cholesterol...fast food is condemned for everybody!

82 posted on 08/03/2003 10:14:50 PM PDT by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Hey now, if it wasn't for us boomers having high school sitins over getting suspended for having long hair or wearing a t-shirt or shorts to school you would be dressed in uniforms by now.
83 posted on 08/03/2003 10:15:48 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Nevermind the fact that the boomers ruined public education, and transformed our universities into Marxist hellholes.
84 posted on 08/03/2003 10:19:53 PM PDT by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Fraulein
If I was a gen-x'r I would be pissed too. My generation turned the world upside down and the freaking Marxist's won.
85 posted on 08/03/2003 10:23:25 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
Go get'em, kids. They are the most self-serving generation ever to live in America.

I will also give thanks to your generation, I truly believe if it wasn't for your generation taking an active role with us gen-Xers we (and by we I also mean America) would really, really be screwed up. Having your generation around is the thing Gen-Y will miss out on most.

Even though they were boomers I was lucky to have good parents however I have seen how having the me-me-me generation as parents has really messed a lot of my generation up. Especially the re-live their failures through their kids types (i.e. The parents of Jon Bone Ramsey)

86 posted on 08/03/2003 10:31:13 PM PDT by qam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: qam1
" Now that the baby boomers are too old to look anything but ridiculous in the new styles they must condem it. I am surprised they aren't pushing for laws, Though I am sure after they are done with fast food that will be coming soon"

I couldn't agree with you more.

Seeing Boomers trash X-ers is far more nauseating than fat chicks in low rise jeans. They are the hypocrite generation.

87 posted on 08/03/2003 10:46:06 PM PDT by Anomaly in Illinois ((never forget !))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Reality has bitten the Yers more than it bit the Xers. Too many Xers were allowed to develop slacker attitudes by overly permissive Boomer parents who wanted to be their "buddies." Not all Xers were/are vile, though.
88 posted on 08/03/2003 10:53:48 PM PDT by 185JHP ( Penumbras. Emanations. Fatuities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
What's worse is that I already saw this thread, and didn't say a word...

Boy, is my face red.

89 posted on 08/03/2003 11:27:01 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Try the Dominican Republic and Brazil, et. al.

Here's a fad for you...Frida Kahlo and Cesar Chavez on U.S. postage stamps...
90 posted on 08/04/2003 12:12:30 AM PDT by CaptIsaacDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP
I was born in '60. I would rather be associated with the Xers rather than Boomers, mostly because as a ten year old, I watched hippies first hand.

And the Boomer teachers I had were America-hating (any obscene noun) whereas the pre-Boomer ones acted as teachers were supposed to.

91 posted on 08/04/2003 6:27:12 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Fraulein
So true. And there's a gadzillion of them in number to support!

I've read that when Social Security first came out, there were fifteen workers for every recipient. Currently there are three workers for every recipient and soon it will only be two workers for every recipient.

Things are going to get interesting.

The Czech Republic is facing these same demographics. Over there, the government actually *encourages* smoking!

92 posted on 08/04/2003 7:45:52 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I guess the author of this article was not young in the seventies. Hip huggers with halter tops were all the rage, long and short. Remember those hip hugger short shorts?
93 posted on 08/04/2003 7:49:03 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Nothing like a nice thong...


94 posted on 08/04/2003 7:52:35 AM PDT by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: qam1
It is from your generation that the Clinton's spawned from and it wasn't until the Gen-Xers all reached voting age until we finally got a Republican congress.
The voters on the cusp between the "boom" and "Gen X" supported Reagan 2-1, made up most of the "Desert Storm" military, and started the entreprenurial-based technology boom.

-Eric

95 posted on 08/04/2003 7:54:14 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP
Not all Yers are back to the real world yet either. This generational thing has had a bit more impact than anyone would expect. I've seen enough of my friends/classmates who've been "bitten" by reality. Thank god that they were, because their parents are so full of themselves. Living in suburbia really sucks in that aspect.
96 posted on 08/04/2003 8:07:56 AM PDT by Ayn Rand wannabe (Veritas vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
Many gen yers are much more conservative than xers. While we did grow up under Clinton, we saw liberalism for the sham it is. We saw the growth of the Conservative media and grew up listening to Rush and watching Fox. I think we're a lot more promising than the previous generation. We can't be blamed for society's problems when we're just graduating college and voted in our first presidential election in 2000.

On the jeans issue, I have a pair of low-rise jeans that were on clearance at Old Navy. I HATE them. I'm constantly having to pull them up and can only wear my longer shirts with them. I think it's extremely tacky when I see girls' thongs showing. I think it says a lot about a girl's morals.
97 posted on 08/04/2003 8:17:34 AM PDT by RockyTop4GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I guess the author of this article was not young in the seventies.

I believe Ms. Malkin is in her early 30s.

Hip huggers with halter tops were all the rage, long and short. Remember those hip hugger short shorts?

Worn with striped tube socks that went up to your knees.

I remember Jr. High in 1982 when short-shorts were still popular for girls. A dress code was passed that said no girls may wear short-shorts with slits up the side to class. Outraged, the girls protested by wearing their regulation gym shorts to class. The gym shorts were, you guessed it, very short with slits up the sides.

98 posted on 08/04/2003 8:18:30 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
I can actually understand Malkin's distress over the way people dress. She has written about it before in relation to her daughter. When I was young we had strict dress codes in school and you still dressed up to go into the city. Our high school was particularly strict, the principal claimed that appearance had a direct effect on behavior and performance. He was right, our school was in the top ten in country in perfomance on the Iowa tests.
99 posted on 08/04/2003 8:29:36 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: usadave
In other words: "Underwear is, like, not required."

The word "like" in the sentence above is, like, not required either.

Fixed your, like, typo...

100 posted on 08/04/2003 8:45:53 AM PDT by null and void (Everything I Needed To Know About Islam I Learned On 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson