Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anglican Leaders Say Gay Bishop May Hurt
8/06/03

Posted on 08/06/2003 4:11:16 AM PDT by kattracks

The Associated Press


SYDNEY, Australia Aug. 6

Anglican leaders in Australia and Malaysia said Wednesday that the election of an openly gay U.S. bishop could hurt the church, but differed on whether it would create a schism.

"In countries like ours, it is not only contrary to Scripture teaching, but also not conducive in our environment," the leader of the Anglican Church of West Malaysia, Bishop Dr. Lim Cheng Ean, said in Kuala Lumpur. "Practicing homosexuality is culturally and legally not acceptable here."

Lim said Southeast Asian Anglican bishops may discuss cutting ties with the U.S. church at a meeting next week, because of openly gay Rev. Gene V. Robinson's appointment as bishop of New Hampshire state.

"We will be having a meeting of the bishops of the province next week. We may discuss this then and a decision may be taken then," he said.

There are four Southeast Asian dioceses Kuching, Singapore, West Malaysia and Sabah.

But the head of Australia's Anglican Church, Primate Peter Carnley, rejected fears that Robinson's appointment would tear apart the Anglican community.

"I don't think it's a communion-breaking issue," said Carnley, who is considered a liberal voice in Australia's Anglican community.

Carnley said Robinson's appointment was likely to have a negative impact, but hoped it would spur a moral debate on homosexuality in Australia rather than a schism.

"It's an issue upon which we are divided but it's not the kind of issue that would cause us to turn out back on our Lord's teachings," Carnley told The Associated Press.

"I think it's clear there is no biblical teachings about long-term committed homosexual people, so I think we have to have a debate about how to apply the biblical principles, which really apply to promiscuity, and apply it to this modern and contemporary issue," he added.(*)

American conservatives and like-minded bishops overseas who represent millions of parishioners have said confirming Robinson would force them to consider breaking away from the church.

The Rev. Peter Jensen, a conservative Anglican archbishop in Sydney, said the decision was catastrophic for the church.

He said the new gay bishop would not be welcome in the Sydney diocese and urged opponents in the United States to fight the decision by withholding contributions to church coffers.

"For the first time, a branch of our Anglican church has knowingly appointed a person to this senior position who lives in breach of the Bible," he said. "It impacts on all of us because when a branch of the church does this, its teachings become compromised."

Melbourne's conservative Archbishop Peter Watson refused to comment on the decision, referring to an earlier statement on Robinson's pending election where he said the American church "has turned its back on our unity and must bear responsibility for the pain and disunity that will be felt throughout the Communion."

The Episcopal Church, with 2.3 million members, is the U.S. branch of the 77 million-member global Anglican Communion, which has been debating the role of gays for decades.




TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: confirmed; fallout; generalconvention; homosexualbishop; schism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
*Emphasis mine.
1 posted on 08/06/2003 4:11:16 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Carnley, I suspect, just purchased a fiery seat with that idiotic, gutless statement.
2 posted on 08/06/2003 4:22:55 AM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"In countries like ours, it is not only contrary to Scripture teaching, but also not conducive in our environment,"

Nor any other societies environment.

3 posted on 08/06/2003 4:23:42 AM PDT by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
>>>"It's an issue upon which we are divided but it's not the kind of issue that would cause us to turn our back on our Lord's teachings," Carnley told The Associated Press.<<

Its this church which has turned its back on the Lords teachings,but this church is not the only church available and many Anglicans should think of going elsewhere for their spiritual needs.
4 posted on 08/06/2003 4:24:22 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"I think it's clear there is no biblical teachings about long-term committed homosexual people, so I think we have to have a debate about how to apply the biblical principles, which really apply to promiscuity, and apply it to this modern and contemporary issue," he added.(*)

I don't believe that the Bibilcal references, nor the societal norms regarding homosexuality are predicated upon issues of promiscuity. I believe it is the act of sodomy itself, not the frequency of the act, that is and has been the issue.

This is truly an interesting parsing. Somehow I feel that the Bibilcal references couldn't encompass the "long-term committed" aspects of the relationship, since the relationship, itself is proscribed. First time, every time.

5 posted on 08/06/2003 4:29:46 AM PDT by steve in DC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: steve in DC
"I think it's clear there is no biblical teachings about long-term committed homosexual people, so I think we have to have a debate about how to apply the biblical principles, which really apply to promiscuity, and apply it to this modern and contemporary issue," he added.(*)

This guy is trying to shave this too thin to justify his own liberal views--the act is wrong whether with one person for ten years or ten new people every year.

Wrong is wrong --there are no shades of gray here.

He also forgets what is spoken of in the Old Testament--Sodom and Gomorrah--just where does he think the word soddomite evolved from?

The Tarheel

7 posted on 08/06/2003 4:39:35 AM PDT by Tarheel (The Old North State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Other Anglican Churches and Organizations

(many conservative)

The Anglican Catholic Church
The Anglican Catholic Church of Canada
The Anglican Church in America
Anglican Communion
Anglicans Online
Anglican Province of America
Anglican Province of Christ the King
American Anglican Council
The Anglican Mission in America
The Charismatic Episcopal Church
Lambeth Conference
Old Catholic Church of America
Order of St. Vincent
The Prayer Book Society (Ecusa)
Reformed Episcopal Church
The Traditional Anglican Communion
The Conference on Anglican Unity
Sodality of the Most Holy Rosary
Traditional Anglican Documents
Episcopal Missionary Church
Episcopal Orthodox Church
United Episcopal Church of North America


The group leading the charge against the gay movement in the Episcopal Church is Episcopal Shield

8 posted on 08/06/2003 4:40:03 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Welcome to the #1 discussion board dedicated to the sustenance of a free republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
Anglican leaders in Australia and Malaysia said Wednesday that the election of an openly gay U.S. bishop could hurt the church...

Ya think????

Here's a clue, guys - think before you select.

10 posted on 08/06/2003 4:52:19 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (Killing FR and driving away the base since 2000......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jammer
Anglican Leaders Say Gay Bishop May Hurt

Does anyone else find this headline, um, amusing?

11 posted on 08/06/2003 4:54:42 AM PDT by Siouxz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
If he cared about the church he would have resigned to avoid a split.
12 posted on 08/06/2003 4:56:01 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
hubris
13 posted on 08/06/2003 5:03:07 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (Killing FR and driving away the base since 2000......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Siouxz
I don't think this "bishop" is the partner using the vaseline.
14 posted on 08/06/2003 5:06:13 AM PDT by JesseHousman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jammer
Neutrality? I wonder what Dante would make of all this. Heresy is spreading through the church like a leprous disease, threatening all that is holy and pure within her. It makes you think on some days the Inquisition was right in keep a vigilant watch on those who intended to repay all that was good with evil.
15 posted on 08/06/2003 5:07:57 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Siouxz
Anglican Leaders Say Gay Bishop May Hurt

Does anyone else find this headline, um, amusing?

I thought about offering some advice about the proper use of Vaseline, but rejected it as crude. Thanks for sharing my vision. :)

16 posted on 08/06/2003 5:16:38 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
It is obvious that the Anglican Church has it's own Bible.

Thus creating a cult, outside of the true word of God.

The Bible clearly states in the Old Testament that Homosexuals are an abomination to God, and the New Testament shows that they will not enter the Kingdom of God.

I feel we are one step closer to rapture!

17 posted on 08/06/2003 5:16:41 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (Ain't nothing worse than feeling obsolete....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; TonyRo76
“The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality.” —Dante Alighieri

Martin Luther wasn't thrilled about quislings, either:

"If I profess with the loudest voice and clearest exposition every portion of the word of God except precisely that little point which the world and the Devil are at that point attacking, I am not confessing Christ, however boldly I may be professing Christ. Where the battle rages, there the loyalty of the soldier is tested. To be steady in all the battlefields besides is mere flight and disgrace, if the soldier flinches at that one point."

18 posted on 08/06/2003 5:17:58 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"I think it's clear there is no biblical teachings about long-term committed homosexual people, so I think we have to have a debate about how to apply the biblical principles, which really apply to promiscuity, and apply it to this modern and contemporary issue,"

Leviticus 18:22: "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination"

Leviticus 20:13 "If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them."

On the nature of man's ruin beginning at Romans 1:19B:

Romans 1:26 "For this reason, God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature"

Romans 1:27: Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due"

Corinthians 6:9: "Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor Homosexuals, nor Sodomites"

Methinks the pastor should re-examine his knowledge of the Bible.

Here's my take on the modern churches, by and large:

They have no fire, they have no passion
they preach what's in fashion,
their prayers are spoken by rote,
their teachings are nothing of note


19 posted on 08/06/2003 5:20:05 AM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poet
Very well said!
20 posted on 08/06/2003 5:25:08 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (Ain't nothing worse than feeling obsolete....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson