Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Internet Worm Plaguing Computers Worldwide
Washington Post ^ | Brian Krebs

Posted on 08/12/2003 2:09:59 PM PDT by WaterDragon

A fast-spreading Internet worm infecting more than a million computers worldwide forced the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration to shut its offices for the day and is causing problems for other computer networks in the Washington region. The worm, dubbed "Blaster" by security experts, is having a "sporadic" effect on federal agency networks, said a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security......(snip) [Article is long but good]

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: computers; computervirus; crashes; denialofservice; download; microsoft; ms; msblast; patch; portal; servicesmsc; virus; vulnerable; worm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-208 next last
To: tallhappy
I can't find it in the registry, but surely I have been infected due to getting the NT Authority System message the past few days until it not appearing now that I have the patch installed and XP firewall up.

Does the patch delete the registry entry? I wouldn't think so.....it seems to just fix the problem, not deal with any existing worm getting through, so I am not sure why I can't find it in the registry.
141 posted on 08/12/2003 11:36:05 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.collegemedianews.com *some interesting radio news reports here; check it out*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
I can't find it on my machine in the task manager processes tab either......weird. Any ideas why?
142 posted on 08/12/2003 11:39:06 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.collegemedianews.com *some interesting radio news reports here; check it out*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
I got the messages a couple days ago. I just ran regedit and there is no such thing on there as "msblast," so either the patch deleted it, or it was not caused by the virus.
143 posted on 08/12/2003 11:43:22 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.collegemedianews.com *some interesting radio news reports here; check it out*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: David1
This has to be one of the most common viruses ever as many people as I have heard appearing to have it.

Than again, it "looks" like I have it, but that can't be.....no registry records or anything.
144 posted on 08/12/2003 11:59:31 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.collegemedianews.com *some interesting radio news reports here; check it out*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
You should see msblast.exe in the task manager's list of processes.

Using regedit you can find the entry that causes it to run on startup and delete that entry.

If you can find neither, then you either don't have the virus or it changes its name. I don't know about the latter.

Killing the process right when you start allows you to go to download new virus definitions and the patch.

145 posted on 08/13/2003 12:19:21 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
If your machine isn't giving you a "Generic Host Process" error and then restarting, you don't have it.

Is your machine restaring everytime you use it?

146 posted on 08/13/2003 12:20:51 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
no....I haven't had the problem since I installed the patch

I got the same message as what the virus causes, however until I installed the patch.

But, it looks like that problem is dealt with now. I won't declare victory until this weekend though. But, I at least don't have the worm.
147 posted on 08/13/2003 12:31:33 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.collegemedianews.com *some interesting radio news reports here; check it out*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Think we've learned our lesson????"

YES!!!!

for a while there I could only be online a very few minutes, but finally got the patch downloaded after selecting the proper one of course.....

thx to all freepers for their help...

148 posted on 08/13/2003 1:40:02 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
"Boy, am I glad I have no such Windows based system in my worm-free, virus-free and error-free computer that does nothing but work fast and beautifully all the time! In case of a question--it's an iMAC, of course, running OS X --no patches req"


Although I too use a Mac I don't use a MAC. MAC is an acronym for Media Access Control, Mac is a personal computer made by Apple Computer, Inc. Which, however, like Unix and Linux systems is pretty much immune to viruses, worms and the other denizens of the Information Technology Bestiary. Sweet.
149 posted on 08/13/2003 2:04:10 AM PDT by drjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
By the way, this worm doesn't come from an email. If you don't have ZoneAlarm you might get the worm. But I think you have it, right?
150 posted on 08/13/2003 3:29:55 AM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So ( Something witty, etc, etc....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
Go to www.murlin.com and they have the update and the patch. They're our internet provider where I work. So far, so good.

Carolyn

151 posted on 08/13/2003 3:38:03 AM PDT by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
My ISP has said that we can't set a firewall because our dialup connections (rural area) are not fast enough. Does this make sense?

Carolyn

152 posted on 08/13/2003 3:50:58 AM PDT by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So
Yikes.....I don't know.......... I better check.......thanks....
153 posted on 08/13/2003 4:08:20 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: CDHart
Not to me, but I am a beginner at this stuff, too. If you are running Windows XP, the firewall is already a part of your program and you don't have to install anything, just turn it on.

154 posted on 08/13/2003 4:10:41 AM PDT by Ronin (Qui tacet consentit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen; CDHart
Terpfen said - Because neither Norton's or Zone Alarm will do much against determined people. Get a hardware firewall

Hmmmmm.... Good advice T, but I think for many people who may not have the resources and know-how to operate one successfully, a software firewall such as ZoneAlarm is an excellent choice. Stops this exploit dead anyways. I run the free version myself, and find it performs as expected (no personal connection to the company). Certainly it is well reviewed. I have been using it from when it offered only one way (outwards) filtering, a few years now.

I read something very interesting just now over at Steve Gibson's site (www.grc.com) and he comments on ZoneAlarms singular ability to adaptively stealth port 113 on a computer. This is apparently a feature not even yet found in hardware firewalls.

CDHart wrote - My ISP has said that we can't set a firewall because our dialup connections (rural area) are not fast enough. Does this make sense?

I can see no reason to not run a firewall Carolyn. The rural connection may be slow, but with a machine containing one of today's fast CPU's the firewall should not add any perceptible "overhead" or lag due to its function. A properly configured modem port helps (e.g, Windows normally is shipped with the COM ports set to 9600bps, and this needs to be changed to, say, 57,600 or even 115,200, if on a 56k dialup).

155 posted on 08/13/2003 4:48:41 AM PDT by gungadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
Do you know why?

It's using a bug in a feature that doesn't exist in Win98 and Win95.

156 posted on 08/13/2003 5:25:37 AM PDT by 6ppc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
I had to turn off the restart feature in Remote Procedure Call to stay on line long enough for the patch to be downloaded.

How is the shutting off problem stopped long enough to make repairs? Follow these steps:

Start>Run>Type "services.msc" in the box>OK

-Scroll down the list of services to "Remote Procedure Call"

-Right Click on Remote Procedure Call and choose properties.

From "Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Properties (Local Machine)" choose the [Recovery] tab. Use the pull-down menus to change the failure actions to "Take no action".

After downloading the patch and setting up your firewall, please put RPC Recovery actions back to Restart...
157 posted on 08/13/2003 6:12:09 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Welcome to the #1 discussion board dedicated to the sustenance of a free republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antivenom
For the record, erasing MSBlast from the registry does not prevent its reemergence a few minutes later. Better to turn off the restart feature in RPC. See my previous post for instructions.
158 posted on 08/13/2003 6:23:43 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Welcome to the #1 discussion board dedicated to the sustenance of a free republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
home network...I'm on the kids' pc
159 posted on 08/13/2003 7:37:51 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
WaterDragon, do you happen to have a link to the patch? There are probably many that could use this info right now.
160 posted on 08/13/2003 7:42:03 AM PDT by pollywog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson