New Dinosaur Species Found in India

AP ^ | August 13, 2003 | RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM

[Michael_Michaelangelo]

Here's one you'll enjoy.

Pretty Pictures!

[VadeRetro]

Too sophisticated. Do you have a comic book?

[Michael_Michaelangelo]

See how ya are? Sheesh. I thought since you were a big fan of 'pretty pictures' you would enjoy some of the ones he has posted on his site. I especially liked the Pengu-Saurus.

Oh well, perhaps some of the lurkers will appreciate it.

[RightWingNilla]

One of these days I'll be watching MNF and see some player getting a round of high-fives for successfully tying his shoes...

Nah, their agents take care of that.

[Michael_Michaelangelo]

There is tons of good info on his main page. I encourage everyone to take a minute and look at the wealth of information he has gathered. Also, he has posted his e-mail address for anyone who has questions or comments.

Jesus, Dinosaurs, and More

FRegards, MM

[RightWingNilla]

Indicating the same designer, not the same ancestor.

Perhaps you can explain why a designer would put the same errors in related species.

[VadeRetro]

Ping me when he gets his Nobel.

[RightWingNilla]

The pic of a T-Rex holding the Bible is quite bizzare.

[Ichneumon]

Perhaps you can explain why a designer would put the same errors in related species.

Especially why a designer postulated to be omniscient and omnipotent would choose to do so.

[BMCDA]

LOL!! I like that letter-puking dinosaur at the bottom of the page ;^)

[BMCDA]

Now isn't that obvious? It's to make it look as if evolution really happened ;^)

[Ichneumon]

Now isn't that obvious? It's to make it look as if evolution really happened

Then perhaps we'd better believe Him, if that's what He's trying to make us believe.

[Junior]

Placemarker.

[DittoJed2]

They are classified as such by human beings. What I am saying is that you can not take the pie, inject it with icing and call it a cake. You have a pie with icing (yuck!). You do not have a species with certain genetic information and have it developing into a creature whose genetic information it does not possess. There are specific elements which make us humans and apes apes. Evolution hasn't even come close to proving that humans and apes share the same ancestor, nor will they because they are completely different kinds of beings.

[DittoJed2]

I don't care how many generations it hypothesizes. What it says is that classical Darwinianism did not deliver on the answers to an evolutionary scientist's questions, did not show what it promised, so this fellow (or fellows) had to come up with a revised theory to try to explain the record.

[DittoJed2]

As you said, whether they are indeed feathers is debatable even in evolutionary circles. And, as I said, feathered dinosaurs don't equal transitional species any more than hairy long tailed dogs equal cats.

[DittoJed2]

ROFL! They are in the BEAR family. It would not surprise me to see different types of bear mating and having offspring. It would surpise me to see a dog and a cat mating and having offspring. Would probably surpise them too!

[DittoJed2]

Pictures aside, has some good information on it. I knew there was at least one other type of bird that had wing claws but didn't know its name. Thank you.

[DittoJed2]

David Plaisted does a pretty good job on the link you gave me. But I tend to believe this:

Who said the designer put the error in there? The designer did not design things so that they would die. His creation was VERY GOOD. Then, man decided he wanted to be god and screwed up the works. God warned them, on the day you eat, you shall surely die, and truly spiritually man died that day, but physically he began to degenerate and get sick too. The Bible says the animals suffered under the same curse. Why? I don't know, other than a perfect world was suddenly made imperfect by Man's sin.

[DittoJed2]

Incidentally, He's coming back and when He does He is going to make everything back the way it was, perfect. Of course, to enjoy this, You have to acknowledge Him as God the Savior.