Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A fair and balanced look at Fox News vs. Al Franken
The Macon Telegraph ^ | Aug. 15, 2003 | Bill Ferguson

Posted on 08/15/2003 9:55:12 AM PDT by Ed Straker

Posted on Fri, Aug. 15, 2003

A fair and balanced look at Fox News vs. Al Franken

First America had to endure Spike Lee's lawsuit against a television network that wanted to include the word "spike" in its call sign. Now a different television network is suing an author to prevent him from using the phrase "fair and balanced" in the title of his book.

Pretty soon it's going to be impossible to hold a conversation in English without violating somebody's copyright.

The Fox News Network has used the catchphrase "fair and balanced" to describe its reporting since 1996.

Apparently, they are so enamored of these three words that they somehow obtained a trademark for them. No one else is allowed to advertise their news coverage as "fair and balanced" except for Fox News.

Enter Al Franken, a raging, unabashed liberal who lives to needle the conservative types who own and operate Fox News. He has a new book coming out called "Lies, and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right." The title is obviously a jab at Fox News and is no doubt meant to make light of their "fair and balanced" claim.

But Fox does not appreciate the subtle art of satire, at least not when it comes to their cherished self-description, and they are suing Franken to prevent him from including the words in the title of his book.

Their lawsuit claims that Franken's book will "blur and tarnish" their patented phrase, and they also take issue with the book's cover design because it mimics the style of two books published previously by Fox icon Bill O'Reilly.

The complaint goes on to label Franken as a "shrill and unstable" individual whose views "lack any serious depth or insight." It also calls Franken a "parasite" who is trying to dishonestly capitalize on Fox's reputation. Fox execs seem to be concerned that it's loyal customers may pick up Franken's book by mistake because of its misleading title and cover design.

Which is, of course, ridiculous. I doubt that very many loyal Fox News viewers are going to buy Franken's book simply because it has the words "fair and balanced" in the title and the cover design is similar to an O'Reilly book. Generally, one doesn't buy a book after just taking a cursory glance at the coverÐyou've either heard something about the book that has piqued your interest or you pick it up and thumb through it to get an idea of what's between the covers. In either case, the typical Fox News loyalist will know enough to keep Franken's book at arm's length even without Fox's paternalistic attempt at protecting them from being misled by a scheming liberal satirist.

The real reason that this lawsuit is being filed is that the suits at Fox don't like Franken, and they are torqued that he is using their catchphrase to ridicule them. This is just the latest installment of a long-standing spitting contest that's been going on between the two parties for some time. The irony is that the lawsuit will provide Franken with reams of free publicity for his book, and can only help to guarantee its debut on the best-seller list.

Of course, that may have been Franken's plan from the start, and the Fox people may be unwittingly playing a starring role in his marketing campaign. The guy may be "shrill and unstable", but apparently he's not stupid.

Bill Ferguson is a resident of Centervillle. He can be reached by e-mail at ferg column@hotmail.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: foxnews; trademark

1 posted on 08/15/2003 9:55:12 AM PDT by Ed Straker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ed Straker
The guy is a leech. He sells books to liberals by including conservative names in his titles. But, I agreem best to ignore this failed Jewish comic.
2 posted on 08/15/2003 10:00:51 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed Straker
I'm sure FOX News would rather ignor the whole thing but they have an obligation to protect the trademark.

I, too, would call it silly and say "it's parody", but since the "author" is Clueless Al, there is reason to believe that something is not on the up'n up.
3 posted on 08/15/2003 10:03:32 AM PDT by whereasandsoforth (tagged for migratory purposes only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed Straker
It's went from 480 or so to the top of the chart since this started.

Silly lawsuit, Faux is getting rather full of themselves.
4 posted on 08/15/2003 10:08:22 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Actually, the suit should cost Franken and his publisher enough to wipe out any profit on the book. Fox has more money than Franken.
5 posted on 08/15/2003 10:08:24 AM PDT by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ed Straker
FOX looks like Spike Lee. C'mon FOX... Eagles don't hunt flies.
6 posted on 08/15/2003 10:08:56 AM PDT by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed Straker
I think that the real point of the law suit is to defend O'Reilly, whose picture appears on the cover of the book, behind the word liars. Franken has had an open war against O'Reilly and since O'Reilly's image is in the public domain, FOX chose to defend the trademarked label of "Fair and Balanced".
7 posted on 08/15/2003 10:09:10 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed Straker
The irony is that the lawsuit will provide Franken with reams of free publicity for his book

That's for certain. Fox could have accomplished more by ridiculing the book on any one of its regular shows.

8 posted on 08/15/2003 10:13:08 AM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed Straker
Their lawsuit claims that Franken's book will "blur and tarnish" their patented phrase

It's trademarked, fool. If the author doesn't know the difference, then how am I to take anything else in the article seriously?

9 posted on 08/15/2003 10:35:21 AM PDT by narby (Fox News = America's News Network)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

A lawsuit is economic warfare, and the suit by Fox against Al Franken will suck down any profits seen from the book and the bevy of free publicity. This crackpot scheme of his is going to wipe him out, whether he wins or not.

Al Franken is shrill, unstable and stupid. He thought he could continue to profit from the popularity of successful conservative outlets (Rush Limbaugh and the 'Fair and Balanced' Fox News) without someone figuring out his little money making scam.
10 posted on 08/15/2003 10:41:51 AM PDT by hnorris (Deserve Victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: moneyrunner
Hope you are right.
11 posted on 08/15/2003 1:46:31 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ed Straker
A lot of mixing on concepts in this article. he got it right once, Fox has the phrase trademarked, which is different than either copyright or patent both of which he also uses (wrongly) to describe Fox's holding of the phrase.
12 posted on 08/15/2003 1:49:35 PM PDT by discostu (just a tuna sandwich from another catering service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed Straker
Is Al Franken the guy that played baggage handler #2 in Trading Places?
13 posted on 08/15/2003 2:10:30 PM PDT by NC Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NC Conservative
Who cares? This is another leech who pretends he's funny, then screams when people tell him to shut up.
14 posted on 08/15/2003 5:05:03 PM PDT by AIRFORCE76 ("from my cold dead fingers..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; xflisa; lainde; ..
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

15 posted on 08/15/2003 6:17:22 PM PDT by nutmeg (Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NC Conservative
I believe so, he used to be kinda like Michael Moore I guess. Just another leftist bitcher.
16 posted on 08/15/2003 6:21:05 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Thanks for the heads up!
17 posted on 08/15/2003 8:05:22 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: NC Conservative
Has Franken ever been in a movie?
I thought the only thing he ever did was be Tom Davis's sidekick on Saturday Night Live back in the '70s.
19 posted on 08/16/2003 8:33:16 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson