Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution-only teaching under fire: Texans urge inclusion of Intelligent Design curriculum
WND.com ^ | 08-17-03 | Olson, Carrie

Posted on 08/17/2003 12:12:58 PM PDT by Theodore R.

Evolution-only teaching under fire Texans push for inclusion of Intelligent Design in public school classrooms

Posted: August 17, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Carrie Olson © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

Texas citizens are trying to rally support for Intelligent Design instruction in public school biology classes which, they say, currently teach evolution as fact, without any consideration of alternative views.

To that end, conservative groups in Montgomery County, Texas, are planning a forum for next month titled "The Censorship of Critical Thought in our Public Schools: Intelligent Design vs. Evolution."

"Most of [the forum's supporters] have natural science backgrounds. We want to bring back critical thinking to schools so students can learn to evaluate ideas instead of falling victim to indoctrination," Jim Jenkins, president of the local Republican Leadership Council told WND. "If we can bring back critical thinking we've done a lot to advance the cause of science."

"We are also pushing for policy change so a teacher who believes in creationism can work in the public schools without feeling threatened," he added.

Mark Cadwallader, a chemical engineer and another panel member, says public school textbooks promote evolution as a scientific fact when it remains an unproven hypothesis. He said he would be satisfied if public school biology teachers would at least include a discussion of evolutionary theory's shortcomings, reports the Magnolia Potpourri newspaper.

"Evolution is a hypothesis which should be presented with all the arguments, pro and con, as true science requires," Cadwallader told the local paper. "We want to go forward with a petition signed by members of the community to get school boards to enact a new policy requiring educators to teach the strengths and weaknesses of the evolution theory."

Cadwallader doubts the forum will cause an immediate policy change, but said he hopes the petition will demonstrate public support for balanced biology instruction and motivate school boards to act.

The petition calls for warning labels on textbooks containing statements about evolution and asks that teachers alert students to religious, non-religious or philosophical bias found in textbooks and other curriculum materials.

The Magnolia school board president said she would be willing to hear the public's concerns regarding how evolution is taught in the classroom, reported the Potpourri, but thinks it could be difficult to monitor how teachers present the issue to students.

The battle between evolutionism and creationism in the classroom is not limited to public schools.

As WorldNetDaily reported, Patrick Henry College, a Virginia-based Christian institution, was rejected for accreditation by the American Academy for Liberal Education because of its policy requiring faculty to adhere to a "biblical worldview" regarding the origin of the world. The denial is currently under review.

"I think what they are saying is that because we teach creationism we've introduced what to them is faux science into our courses," Patrick Henry College President Michael Farris told WorldNetDaily. "They ignore the fact that we teach about evolution. It's not good enough to teach about evolution; apparently we have to teach that evolution is the only way to think about things."

Jenkins and his colleagues hope to change that attitude, at least in their school district.

"We're giving away free tickets to the American Humanists and other groups who would disagree with us," Jenkins told WorldNetDaily. "About half of the forum will be Q&A where we invite the audience to get involved. We expect a lot of participation."

The forum will take place at Montgomery County College on Sept. 18 and will include discussion of four major topics: The Origins of Life, Natural Selection, The Fossil Record and DNA: The Language of Life.

Jenkins and others like him believe a little hard work and perseverance can make a big difference in the public arena, especially in the local community where their efforts have the greatest impact.

"The Christians and conservatives are just sitting on their hands, but when we fight back just a little bit we make huge gains," Jenkins said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: cadwallader; education; evolution; intelligentdesign; jimjenkins; scienceeducation; tx

1 posted on 08/17/2003 12:12:59 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
amen.
2 posted on 08/17/2003 1:17:01 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Ping-pong ping.
3 posted on 08/17/2003 1:18:38 PM PDT by general_re ("And just like that...he's gone..." - Verbal Kint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Smells like another 1500+ thread
4 posted on 08/17/2003 1:23:48 PM PDT by SkyRat (If privacy wasn't of value, we wouldn't have doors on bathrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
"The Censorship of Critical Thought in our Public Schools: Intelligent Design vs. Evolution."

This is the crux of the matter...evolutionist refuse to allow any questioning of their model for explaining "life" and it's origin. The define away anything that can't be touch, seen, or measured. There is ample evidence to the contrary, but they claim to win by definition, not by examining the evidence.

The evolutionist/NEA/NCSE model of education is indoctrination, not critical thinking.

5 posted on 08/17/2003 1:53:23 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"Mark Cadwallader, a chemical engineer and another panel member, says public school textbooks promote evolution as a scientific fact when it remains an unproven hypothesis. He said he would be satisfied if public school biology teachers would at least include a discussion of evolutionary theory's shortcomings, reports the Magnolia Potpourri newspaper."

Ok, I don't see it. Would someone tell me what is so objectionable about this, from a scientific perspective? It is a theory, right? It does have holes, right? Why not talk about them in the open if the public school has to teach this?
6 posted on 08/17/2003 1:58:27 PM PDT by =Intervention= (Moderate pubs and the liberals -- you know they love to get along....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: =Intervention=
What are some of the shortcomings that ought to be discussed, in your opinion?
7 posted on 08/17/2003 2:02:57 PM PDT by general_re ("And just like that...he's gone..." - Verbal Kint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: =Intervention=
It is a theory, right?

They teach "Music Theory" too

It does have holes, right?

The "holes" that are found in droves by the creationists are about equivalent to the "holes" that are found in the Surpreme Court decision to end the Florida fiasco.

Gore never had a chance to win, and creationism (dressed up as ID) has no chance of finding enough genuine evidence to overcome evolution.

8 posted on 08/17/2003 2:25:24 PM PDT by narby (Fox News = America's News Network)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
By Carrie Olson © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

The pushing of creationism is why I stopped paying attention to WND. Before they started that stupidity, I thought WND really had a chance to become a major media player.

9 posted on 08/17/2003 2:27:13 PM PDT by narby (Fox News = America's News Network)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Teaching ignorance. Now, that's a concept.
10 posted on 08/17/2003 2:41:21 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narby
creationism (dressed up as ID) has no chance of finding enough genuine evidence to overcome evolution.

It already has. Science already deems the Universe as having been designed and the only alternative is the ridiculous multiple Universe theory. Life is deemed by science to have been impossible to have arisen by chance materialistic means. Behe's irreducibly complex flagellum which could not have possibly arised as a result of evolution is scientific fact.

There is tons of Evidence Disproving Evolution, there are also many Amazing Creatures which are totally unexplainable by evolutionary theory, and many logical and scientific reasons to say Bye Bye Darwin .

11 posted on 08/18/2003 5:01:07 AM PDT by gore3000 (ALS - Another good Christian banned from FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Irreducable complexity is one. Another is the poor track record of spontaneous mutation in producing positive benefits for the host organism. There are many others, which other posters on this thread have alluded to.

12 posted on 08/18/2003 1:13:09 PM PDT by =Intervention= (Moderate pubs and the liberals -- you know they love to get along....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: narby
You willfully miss the point. By definition, a theory is not truth. You also categorize any flaw on part of the theorists as basically unallowable, for the theory is perfect. That's dogmatism, which is just as knee-jerk as either ID or Christians are tagged as being.

13 posted on 08/18/2003 1:17:18 PM PDT by =Intervention= (Moderate pubs and the liberals -- you know they love to get along....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
This is the crux of the matter...evolutionist refuse to allow any questioning of their model... They define away anything that can't be touched, seen, or measured.

The bane of science, to be sure.

14 posted on 08/18/2003 1:24:44 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: =Intervention=
Another is the poor track record of spontaneous mutation in producing positive benefits for the host organism.

In that case, the Ames test can't possibly work. You see, it depends on beneficial mutations to work.

I guess the millions of successful uses of the test have all been one grand illusion...
15 posted on 08/18/2003 8:53:53 PM PDT by Karl_Lembke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson