Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cuba Blows the Whistle on Iranian Jamming
Asia Times ^ | Aug 22, 2003 | Safa Haeri

Posted on 08/21/2003 10:13:24 AM PDT by Weimdog

Cuba blows the whistle on Iranian jamming

By Safa Haeri

The Islamic Republic of Iran might lose one of its very few friends in the world, Cuba, which, according to American officials, has officially informed them that the Iranian embassy in Havana was the source of jamming programs send out by US-based Iranian radio and television stations aimed at mainland Iran.

The jamming related to Telestar-12, a commercial communications satellite orbiting at 15 degrees west, 22,000 miles above the Atlantic, which carries programs by the American government as well as by Iranian radio and television stations based in the US aimed at mainland Iran. The interference began on July 16, coinciding with the start of a new wave of pro-democracy protests led by Iranian students in Tehran against the country's clerical leaders.

At first, it was believed that the Cuban government, acting on demands from Iran's ayatollahs, was jamming the US government and private Persian-language radio and TV broadcasts into Iran, as the stations, based mostly in Los Angeles, had attracted an impressive popularity within Iran.

Satellite-broadcasting experts said at the time that since Tehran could not jam the Telstar-12, due to its stationary position, it made the request for friendly Cuba to do it instead.

But on Wednesday a spokeswoman for the US State Department said that Havana had informed them that the jamming was made by the Iranians in Cuba, using a compound in a suburb of the capital belonging to the Iranian embassy.

According to a source, the Cubans have now shut down the facility and presented a protest note to the Iranian government in Tehran, and the jamming stopped earlier this month. "Cuba informed us on August 3 that they had located the source of the interference and had taken action to stop it," Jo-Anne Prokopowicz of the State Department said.

"The government of Cuba informed us that the interference was coming from an Iranian diplomatic facility," she said, adding, "We will be following this up with Iran."

After denying that it was responsible for the jamming but pledging to investigate the US complaints in mid-July, Cuba told the US that it had found the source and that it had acted to stop it, she said.

The news surprised many Iranian observers, doubting Cuban leader Fidel Castro's "innocence" in the affair. "Being a fully police state, it is difficult to believe that the Iranians had introduced the sophisticated jamming equipment into Cuba without the knowledge of the Cuban authorities," Dr Shahin Fatemi, a veteran Iranian political analyst, told The Asia Times Online.

Noting that both Iran and the Marxist regime of Cuba shared the "same mutual hate" towards Washington, Fatemi, who teaches international economics at the American University of Paris, added, however, that if the information is correct, then it must be welcomed by all Iranians opposed to the present theocracy.

In his view, the Cuban decision could also be viewed as a signal from Castro to the Bush administration, which has labelled Iran as a part of an "axis of evil" along with North Korea and Iraq under Saddam Hussein.

According to Alireza Meybodi, a popular radio broadcaster at Radio Yaran in Los Angeles, Iranian authorities gave in the past jammed foreign broadcasts locally (in Iran) with mobile equipment bought from Russia, while using more sophisticated means installed in Cuba as well.

"This is quite obvious when we announce some of our programs beforehand, like one very recently concerning an interview with Hojjatoleslam Hoseyn Khomeini, the grandson of Ayatollah Khomeini, which was filled with locally-produced parasite [interference]," he indicated, adding that most of the foreign-based radio and television stations could be seen normally outside the capital Tehran.

About a dozen of Persian-language television and radio stations, run by Iranians opposed to the present Iranian regime, are beamed towards Iran, where a majority of the 70 million inhabitants is made of men and women under the age of 30, thirsty for modern entertainment programs - and news.

Though the regime has banned satellite dishes, it is estimated that more than 2 million households, using small and easily concealed equipment, receive the programs.

At the time of last month's student protests, Iran said that the US broadcasts into the country were interference in its internal affairs, and accused the US-based Iranian opposition of inflaming the unrest.

(Copyright 2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)


TOPICS: Cuba; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; US: California
KEYWORDS: cuba; iran; irantv; jamming; satellitetv
Found this story at Jeff Jarvis' buzzmachine.com
1 posted on 08/21/2003 10:13:24 AM PDT by Weimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Weimdog
I wonder what international law has to say on the issue? I would think a nation would have the right to block what it considers propaganda being beamed into it's territory.
2 posted on 08/21/2003 10:16:37 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weimdog
1 Tommahawk?
3 posted on 08/21/2003 10:16:56 AM PDT by MonroeDNA (No longshoremen were injured to produce this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weimdog
"...the Cuban decision could also be viewed as a signal from Castro to the Bush administration...

...that there's just no future in supporting terror states?

4 posted on 08/21/2003 10:26:36 AM PDT by dogbrain ("Life is hard son. It's harder if you're stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve50
I believe you'll find that foreign interference with properly licensed broadcasts are illegal under international law. Now, if the stuff being beamed into Iran interfered with a duly licensed station in Iran using the same frequency, that'd be a different story, but the various authorities would have caught that and assigned them different frequencies if they were both licensed.

This is the problem that countries like China, Iran, etc., have with international law. It doesn't allow them to control their populace's information sources as they'd like.

Cuba has deniability here. An embassy is soverign territory of the country whose embassy it is, and they can import things under the "diplomatic pouch" concept that the receiving country cannot inspect. Whether or not that's what actually occured in this case isn't known, but Cuba can at least claim they didn't know.
5 posted on 08/21/2003 10:36:24 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn; Cincinatus' Wife
ping
6 posted on 08/21/2003 10:37:03 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RonF
I believe you'll find that foreign interference with properly licensed broadcasts are illegal under international law.

I wasn't aware that there was an international agency to issue a global license. I would think the nation involved would have to issue one. Wouldn't China need a U.S. of A license to broadcast in our nation, whither it was using open, unused frequencies or not?

7 posted on 08/21/2003 10:47:18 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Weimdog
Cuba played this one shrewdly. There is a reason Castro's still around. What a snake oil merchant.
8 posted on 08/21/2003 10:56:23 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (The Problem With Socialism Is That You Eventually Run Out Of Other People's Money - Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve50
I don't think it's a matter of a global license as much as there are allocations of different frequency bands for different purposes to different countries.

After all, if these things were completely independent, you could have two broadcast stations on opposite sides of an international border using the same frequency and interfering with each other. And there are shortwave radio stations that can be heard across continents and oceans. In fact, I'm going to ask for a shortwave radio for my birthday, I think. I don't know the details, but I'm pretty sure that this is not left up to a zillion bi-lateral agreements between pairs of countries. There's some kind of central clearing house or commission to deal with this. The UN may run it now, but it predates it.
9 posted on 08/21/2003 10:57:26 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steve50
It's probably legitimate to jam a broadcast in your own country with a local jammer, in such a fashion that the jamming signal doesn't leave your own borders. To jam a signal by beaming energy into a sattelite that's not within your borders is a different matter, and I don't know the law in that matter.
10 posted on 08/21/2003 11:00:11 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RonF
It's probably legitimate to jam a broadcast in your own country with a local jammer, in such a fashion that the jamming signal doesn't leave your own borders.

Radio waves don't obey borders. I also would think a nation lacking the ability to block a signal would be within their rights to ask a friendly source for assitance, or contract the job out.

11 posted on 08/21/2003 11:08:13 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: steve50
Radio waves don't obey borders.

No, but they do obey natural laws, such as the inverse square law. If you limit the power of a jamming device and site them properly, you can limit their effect to a particular location. Iran does have the ability to jam a signal beamed into their country without having to attack the source.

12 posted on 08/21/2003 11:36:31 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP; Weimdog
Bump!
13 posted on 08/22/2003 4:11:20 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson