[JNB]

Actually I think Arnies defense was quite poor, he provided little in the way of substance, much less facts, just rhetoric that one gets from, as I said, from the WSJ editorial pages. The thread was quite reasonable untill you and Arnie started to spew the venom, and my remark stands, neo-conservatives are as clueless about the real world as liberals are. Certainly my and others remarks were far more measured than the venom and you and Arnie have spewed on this thread.

Saying that Paleo-cons are losers, want govrenment handouts and the like, getting quite defensive does little to help your side of the arguement. As for the borwn shirt remark, please, should I invoke Goodwins law now about a thread being over with a unwarranted NAZI reference?

[Once-Ler]

should I invoke Goodwins law now about a thread being over with a unwarranted NAZI reference?

Do what ever you please JNB. This poorly read neo-con is done making you look like a sap. Your recent pitiful whinebaby response has made me see the error of my ways. You can have the last word I will not be commenting further to you on this thread.