OUI, OUI: ARNOLD PUMPS UP ORGIES AND DOPE IN '77 SHOCK INTERVIEW

Drudge Report ^

[journey7873]

Posted on Drudge and Smoking Gun: The California recall campaign is officially getting dirty...

[Jim Robinson]

To all:

Do not post the text of this "article" or even a link to it. It is inappropriate material for FR and will be deleted.

Thanks,

Jim

[journey7873]

Why is it not appropriate?

[Senator Pardek]

Oui Vey!

[Jim Robinson]

Guess.

[dogbyte12]

I will not comment on the text, other than to say, I would love to see him explain now how his morals have changed since this interview. His moral values stunk then. I willl withold any comments on what he said because this is a family friendly site.

[gdani]

Ohhh.....maybe the swear words. Or the "frank sexual talk". Or.......

[prarie earth]

Is this the best the Clinton/Grey Davis team has got?

[Pokey78]

In California, this will GET him votes.

[DoughtyOne]

What is your fascination with full frontal male nudity?

[Windcatcher]

They think this will make voters mad? I couldn't stop laughing :^)

[prarie earth]

lol, Is Mary Carey available for comment?

[ambrose]

the interview will probably win him endorsements from all the major homosexual groups in California.

[Tempest]

*Sigh* What a pathetic attempt at slander. I haven't changed since 77' either. . .

GWB used to drink!!! *Shock*

[ambrose]

did you read the interview?

[ElkGroveDan]

Wow, I bet Bill Clinton is envious of Arnold. He's just as liberal but way more of a pervert.

[Ronin]

I am sure Arnold knew this was going to come out and already has a plan in place to deal with it.

Fact is, I vaguely remember reading this article when it was first published.

If I am not mistaken, there was even a "Little Annie Fanny" cartoon spoof of him back then too.

[journey7873]

What is your fascination with full frontal male nudity?

Wow, brilliant post.

[Voice in your head]

Most of the text cannot be published in the media, because it is so explicit. However, the only really damaging thing in the text is the part about using drugs. Other than that, he was candid about a good sex life. So what? Nobody had to buy the magazine - and he wasn't getting laid in the oval office while on the taxpayers' payroll.

[gdani]

I also question the labeling of it as a "dirty" campaign trick.

Making unproven accusations or starting whispering campaigns based purely on speculation -- stuff like that is dirty campaign stuff. Or when some people tried to make an issue about the race of Phil Gramm's wife.

But what's so "dirty" about calling to everyone's attention an interview that Ahh-nald gave to a magazine? I mean, what did he expect when he started running?