Main Entry: dog-ma-tism
Pronunciation: 'dog-m&-"ti-z&m,
Function: noun
Date: 1603
1 : positiveness in assertion of opinion especially when unwarranted or arrogant
2 : a viewpoint or system of ideas based on insufficiently examined premises
As to your later request for me to debate the atheists position on rights, I already told you that I am not an atheist. Go find your own atheist to debate. I suggest one of the Objectivist websites. If you find one, let me know....I'd like to watch them whup yer butt in debate.
Regards
J.R.
I have not asked you to debate the atheists' position, which you have asserted is "a rational, compelling argument in favor of natural rights," I've simply asked you show it to us. If you can do so, I would be happy to debate it for you.
Can you not back up your assertion?
I'd like to watch them whup yer butt in debate.
Of course you would, because you are angry at me and weaponless in this argument. You've confessed and demonstrated that you personally are incapable of administering such a "whupping". All you are manifestly capable of at this point is name-calling.
Besides, only my husband has the authority to "whup" my butt (because I have ceded it to him), and only our Creator gets to watch. (;