Skip to comments.
O'Reilly Tears Into the New York Times
NewsMax.com ^
| 9/03/03
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 09/03/2003 5:58:22 PM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: nutmeg
Thanks for the heads up!
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: montag813
John Batchelor had a good guest on tonight:
Peter Lance who wrote
"1000 Years for Revenge--International Terrorism and the FBI
The Untold Story"
*******
So many warnings before 9/11.....I want to read the book, but first I have to get through my daughter's wedding on Nov. 1.
To: Dr. Scarpetta
Yeah, O'Reilly is practically the only person still pinning for the "WMD explanation".
24
posted on
09/03/2003 10:17:58 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Democrats have stunted brain development!)
To: Fledermaus
He's trying very hard not to be seen as a Republican supporter. He claims to be an "independent," even though Democrats trash him for being a conservative every chance they get.
To: marvlus
I certainly would like to know about the WMD's in Iraq.Then read more. If you a registered Republican and smart enough to read and post on Free Republic then you should have more than enough information to show we were correct on WMD's.
Or were you one of those that want to see barrels of chemicals and tube of biological antigens to make the point? This was never the case being made. The case for WMD was made equally by the libs in the Clinton administration as well as the conservatives in the Bush administration as to the WMD "capability" and past usage.
We found the lab trucks they used albeit cleaned up. We found the documents that describe the program. We found buried parts in nuclear scientists back yards that were used in the nuclear program.
You can easily use the computer to search the internet for article after article on what we have and have not found.
And soon the White House will show the things we found under David Kay's inspections and info gathering. Of course the press, and probably you, will poo-poo the evidence because, as I pointed out, it's not a barrel of chemicals or a test tube full of ricin or a nuclear weapon with the timer in the movie mode of stopping at :01.
Reality isn't like that.
26
posted on
09/03/2003 10:25:37 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Democrats have stunted brain development!)
To: ladyinred
BRAVO! I don't always like O'Reily, but he is right on with this one! The Times is doing all it can to promote leftist politics and stop the war on terror! This from a newspaper located where the WTC once stood. There are not enough words to say how much contempt I have for them.I like the "memo" segment - I tune in just to get that straight no chaser opinion. Then I turn the channel. BO's boring when the heads are debating, and he would need to project a more benign personality to carry off championing of causes.
But he's surprisingly good, for a big government Irishman, at expounding on the faults of socialism.
He tries to cover the gamut on a cable news/opinion show. It's too scattered. I think he should slow things down, focus exclusively and artfully on his muckraking, and target primarily abuses in lefty organizations like the NYT.
To: ontos-on
Did you catch Kramer saying the other day the oil companies aren't making much money and the increase in price was justified because they haven't been able to build a new refinery for more then 10 years ! He was on MSPMS on little Krissy's show and was on fire for BIG OIL !
Since 9/11 I don't think he's a Lib anymore :)
28
posted on
09/03/2003 10:34:03 PM PDT
by
america-rules
(I'm one proud American right now !)
To: kattracks
The New York Times, the newspaper of record for so many news outlets BUT arn't they the ones who published made up stories? And Fox, always referring to a story published by the times, are they not hooked up with the New York Post?
29
posted on
09/03/2003 10:40:07 PM PDT
by
gulfcoast6
(The Clintons, remember when we were told 'TWO FOR ONE'?)
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
30
posted on
09/03/2003 10:50:23 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: Dr. Scarpetta
So many warnings before 9/11.....I want to read the book, but first I have to get through my daughter's wedding on Nov. 1. Congratulations and good luck! Best of wishes to your daughter and her fiance.
To: Dr. Scarpetta
John Batchelor had a good guest on tonight: Peter Lance who wrote "1000 Years for Revenge--International Terrorism and the FBI The Untold Story" Yes, I too listened to them. It was excellent, as usual.
To: mahinahoku
And O'Reilly did more for Al Franken's stupid book with that idiotic lawsuit of his.
33
posted on
09/03/2003 11:09:16 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
To: Fledermaus
Sounds like you have the inside track on Kay's report, since you're a smarter person than I am.
35
posted on
09/04/2003 2:37:14 AM PDT
by
marvlus
To: kattracks
"the defamatory charge has been refuted time and time again"
O'Reilly seems to think he can refute a documented charge by repeating angry denials.
To: All
37
posted on
09/04/2003 2:45:52 AM PDT
by
backhoe
To: kattracks
O'Reilly is a self proclaimed populist whose best selling books and highest rated prime time show illustrates that he does seem to have a knack for having his finger on the pulse of mainstream America.
He may not be conservative but he is on our side and leads the Fox charge against the marxists.
BUMP
38
posted on
09/04/2003 2:58:32 AM PDT
by
tm22721
(May the UN rest in peace)
To: kattracks
BO had a good guest on last night. A guy named Posner plugging a book titled WHILE AMERICA SLEPT. Extemely good info on the house of saud, Bill Clinton, Sandy Berger, the Germans, et al, all turning a blind eye to the terrorist plotting against us and this with tons of info out there. More and more info is coming out against the slick one yet I will bet a dollar to a donut that not one major media outlet will pick it up.
39
posted on
09/04/2003 4:37:07 AM PDT
by
7thson
(I think it takes a big dog to weigh a 100 pounds.)
To: marvlus
Yeah, and I'm a registered Rat, and I hate all rats. This is as truthful as your so called "I'm a registered republican!"
BS! This gets really old on Free Republic. You trolls need another mantra besides "I'm a real Republican!".
40
posted on
09/04/2003 6:30:04 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(May our brave warriors kill all of the Islamokazis/facists/nazis to prevent future 9/11's.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson