Lib Author Regrets Voting for clinton / "Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America

The O'Reilly Factor | 9.4.03 | Mia T

[HoustonCurmudgeon]

Her name is there - right under the title and after the phrase "Posted by:"

I assume you are trying to be smata$$ed or show me I'm being stupid? However I read FR by hiting the "Latest Posts" button and then read whatever interests me. Thus the posted by is the latest person to post a reply not the person who posted the article.

Have a nice day.

[185JHP]

Saddest part of the Posner interview was when old Bill said "I won't condemn Clinton." Bill's got a problem...

[WorkingClassFilth]

"I assume you are trying to be smata$$ed or show me I'm being stupid?"

Nope. Sorry. No need.

[HoustonCurmudgeon]

Nope. Sorry. No need.

OH thanks again for your input. It is as incorrect as your first answer but I do so love a fool. It is best, as shown by your first, provably incorrect answer, to just keep your mouth shut when you don't know what you're talking about.

I'm off to the hospital now, but will look forward to your next reply.

[WorkingClassFilth]

Just click the 'BACK' button when you don't wish to view a thread - very easy to do. Enjoy your time at the hospital!

[windchime]

Bump!

[Mia T]

Although, that is what appears to be occurring, clinton doormat is not a credible construct, i.e., any contact with anything clinton for any reason can never de-soil.

What I suspect is happening is this: A certain subset of smarter Ds are concluding that the clintons, clintonism, and a Democrat Party under clinton control are, now and forever, deadly for America (and deadly for Democrats).

[jla]

bttt

[Frapster]

After a good night's sleep and getting on FR this morning to see that my own personal Jiminy Cricket is still writing to me I decided to review Mia's posts and see if there was any merit to his jibes. I came across your own observation and her response and I'll simply say that my previous days comments are renewed with vigor.

I am on Cable and the pages do indeed load instanstly for me. I am also, however, a graphic artist, illustrator and web designer and I think that anyone who abuses the eyes of their users in such a way will get one of two reactions - appreciation or other. Particularly once certain aspects of the work are repeated with no apparent value in the thread except to make it longer and harder to read or, as in your case, harder to download.

As a person who makes a living out of helping people attract readers and keep their attention it's my opinion that Mia's going about it all wrong. But obviously I am unaware that she's a fixture on these forums so I will end my participation in this thread as I promised I would and go on my merry way ignoring MiaT posts. If that's more than a self-proclaimed heathan can handle so be it.

[firewalk]

Good morning Mia
bttt

[Mia T]

1- My target group is not what you seem to think it is. My primary aim is NOT to preach to the choir.

2- I know from feedback that I am reaching that group.

3- Consider any "eye abuse" caused by the grotesquerie and meretriciousness of my graphics a metaphor for the graphically corrupt clinton years.

4- Our theories of attraction and repulsion in cyberspace are apparently diametrically opposed; this observation is confirmed by the stark disparity of our home pages. (I am curious about your theories of attraction. It is surprising to me that a graphic artist and illustrator would have nary a graphic on his home page.)

[Mia T]

Make that:

3- Consider any "eye abuse" caused by the grotesquerie and meretriciousness of my graphics a metaphor for the abusive, graphically corrupt clinton years.

[mickie]

Evening bump.

[L.A. Blossom]

I have a question and I'm posting this on here along as on a libral board also so I can get answers from "both" sides. I personally wouldn't help Hillary as I'm Republican. A friend of mine is thinking of helping out with Hillary's campaign by starting a chapter of voters for Hillary here in the Los Angeles area (which is organized through Hillary's staff on that new website) and she has no idea what it would involve and either do I. Does anyone think it is risky? I have heard that Hillary isn't the most honest person, but I don't know what to really believe. Could my friend be setting herself up for something "crooked" or even worse? Suppose something didn't go right or up to Hillary's expectations, could it be dangerous for my friend? I have told her it's probably risky. Please give any advice you have.

Thank you!!

[WorkingClassFilth]

If you are unaware of the Clinton realities after the last eleven years, you are probably just the kind of volunteer the Clintons would be looking for.

If you are young, this is understandable. If you are older, this is unthinkable (and, frankly, disingenuous). In either case, a political education is available on these threads that you'll never obtain through causal uptake of the mainstream media.

Sorry to say, but you'll find little support for such a venture among those of us that post.

[WorkingClassFilth]

"...I'll simply say that my previous days comments are renewed with vigor...I am also, however, a graphic artist, illustrator and web designer and I think that anyone who abuses the eyes of their users in such a way will get one of two reactions - appreciation or other. Particularly once certain aspects of the work are repeated with no apparent value in the thread except to make it longer and harder to read or, as in your case, harder to download...As a person who makes a living out of helping people attract readers and keep their attention it's my opinion that Mia's going about it all wrong."

"To measure ourselves in comparison to those around us to determine our own worth and ability, is indeed foolish."

[exit82]

Count me as one who is a fan of your work in compiling info on the Clintons.

[Frapster]

WCF - I wondered where you went. Glad to see you hadn't abandoned me.

[WorkingClassFilth]

And here I thought you had left forever as you had promised. You're not being inconsistent in your promises, too, are you?

I went on top of my garage and shed to frame, sheath and shingle. No need to worry though, I'm more consistent in my ideology and tender mercies than 99.9% of the Christians I've ever met.

BTW, where did our curmudgeonly friend go? Did he get a "Lighten up, Francis" notice?