Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beelzebubba
As much as I loathe LEFTISTS like Chuckie Schumer, I have to wonder about only two aircraft allowed to fly within 24 hours of 9/11. Understandably, Air Force One. The other is VERY disconcerting, an aircraft belonging to the Saudis.

Mr. Schumer said in an interview that he suspected that some of the Saudis who were allowed to leave, particularly two relatives of Mr. bin Laden who he said had links to terrorist groups themselves, could have shed light on the events of Sept. 11.

The article depicts an elaborate but hurried evacuation carried out within a week of the hijackings in which private planes picked up Saudis from 10 cities. Some aviation and bureau officials said they were upset by the operation because the government had not lifted flight restrictions for the general public, but those officials said they lacked the power to stop the evacuation, the article says.

This may very well have been published in past but, it has not been discussed here on FR at any great lengths that I can recall. Again, the events around and on 9/11 need to be discussed. We all know about Caligula Clinton's criminality. What we don't know much about imo, are things related to this thread that occured AFTER the Sinkmeister and Hildabeast.
48 posted on 09/04/2003 1:43:46 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pyx
As much as I loathe LEFTISTS like Chuckie Schumer, I have to wonder about only two aircraft allowed to fly within 24 hours of 9/11. Understandably, Air Force One. The other is VERY disconcerting, an aircraft belonging to the Saudis.

If the concern had truly been "concern for their safety", they could have been placed into protective custody at the nearest Army base

53 posted on 09/04/2003 2:31:48 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === needs a job at the moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: pyx
This may very well have been published in past but, it has not been discussed here on FR at any great lengths that I can recall.

Whether you can recall it or not, it most certainly was.

The media is dredging up old news and making it sound like it is "new".

Just the other day there was a "revelation" of a "top secret" phone call between President Bush and VP Cheney on 9/11. The article went on to reveal that it was just learned that Bush had given the "shoot down" order if any aircraft did not comply with the no fly order and so on.

Well, I demonstrated in short order that this was widely known as of September 17, 2001.

There is a reason that, as others have noted, these old events are being brought up as if they are just discovered facts, and it is not to shed light, but to make sinister accusations against this administration.

56 posted on 09/04/2003 2:55:58 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: pyx
Mr. Schumer said in an interview that he suspected that some of the Saudis who were allowed to leave, particularly two relatives of Mr. bin Laden who he said had links to terrorist groups themselves, could have shed light on the events of Sept. 11.

But during the past two years, has any evidence come forward for their arrests? No.

58 posted on 09/04/2003 3:13:52 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: pyx
"The things that are related to this thread" are still related to Bubblehead-Bill and his consort.

If the Dems manage to pin any of 9-11 on the Republicans, Bush should fire every P.R. guy on staff.

September 11 occurred because godless democrats ignored real life problems while they pandered to the lowest common denominator in order to remain in power.

59 posted on 09/04/2003 3:14:53 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson