This court will rule, as it did in the Colorado case, that this law is motivated by animus against homosexuals.
Which it is.
Traditional marriage has three elements:
1) It is permanent, and non-dissolvable except under extraordinary circumstances not directly under the control of the parties.
2) It is sexually exclusive, and violations are punishable by the criminal law.
3) It is between a man and a woman.
Numbers one and two are dictated by the created nature of men and women. The establishment of permanency and fidelity in law practically guarantees #3, since permanency and fidelity are the natural law accompaniments of heterosexual marriage.
Once the heterosexuals of this country eliminated #1 and #2 from the "definition of marriage", the question arose of whether such a minimalist concept of marriage (i.e., non-permanent, non-exclusive, but for males and females only) could survive.
It probably won't. But the destroyers of marriage are the straight male legislators who passed the 1969-73 marriage "reforms", not a few gays who have drawn the logical inferences.
Scripter will be off line occasionally between now and the middle of September. I've agreed to help him out by running his homosexual agenda ping list.
| Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links |
| Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list) |
| Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search |
| All FreeRepublic Bump Lists |
A simple freepmail is all it takes to subscribe to or unsubscribe from scripter's homosexual agenda ping list. If you wish to be added to the list in scripter's absence, please FReepmail me.