Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Satanic Schwarzeneggerians
WorldNetDaily ^ | 9-15-03 | Vox Day

Posted on 09/15/2003 1:50:36 AM PDT by ambrose

Satanic Schwarzeneggerians


Posted: September 15, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Vox Day


© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

"I have gone back and forth on Schwarzenegger, so much that I almost have whiplash. But my new – my current – position on him is: To hell with him."

– Jay Nordlinger, National Review

I like Arnold, the bodybuilding evangelist and the movie star. But I have no regard for Mr. Schwarzenegger-Kennedy, the evasive politician. He's a man of the people now – give him a little more time and he'll be feeling our pain and doing everything "for the children." Fortunately, it didn't take long for Arnold to destroy himself as a viable candidate in the eyes of thinking conservatives everywhere. He was already suspect, indeed, anathema to those of us who believe in principles over party.

But he damned himself even with the pragmatists, those who care more for power, party and position than principle, with his dismissal as "right-wing crazies" those who support Proposition 54, which bans the state's collection of racial statistics on the population. How eminently fitting that a son of a National Socialist would fail to see the dangers in compiling such data! After all, without it, how can the state be expected to find those pesky Jews and Japanese in case it serves the interests of the children to round them up again?

The Republican enthusiasm for Arnold was initially based on his star power. It was nice, for a change, to see a Hollywood entity throw in with the GOP for once instead of barking mindlessly at it with the usual combination of vacuous accusations and cretinous insults. But his real support stemmed from his presumed electability, which sufficed to prevent numerous Democratic grandees from throwing their hats into the ring.

The problem is that the concept of electability is a massive crock of fumet. The Bush administration is demonstrating this truth in real-time, as its compassionate big-government neo-conservatism expands the federal leviathan at a pace faster than anyone since FDR. Would President Gore have been worse? Perhaps – but then there would be an opportunity to elect a man who actually opposed the rising tide of government in 2004 instead of surfing it like a cattle rancher gone beach-boy stoner.

Schwarzenegger, far from representing the salvation of California's Republican Party, stands for its complete immolation. He does not offer a philosophical alternative to California's self-destructive Democratic socialism; instead, he is a form of life-support for it. Instead of swearing to cut spending, he vows to beg more money from the federal government – demonstrating very clearly that this Republican is no republican!

Republicans in the state legislature have held their ground against the rapacious taxes proposed by Gov. Davis, and their obdurate political Manichaenism will allow them to do the same against Bustamante. But they will not be able to resist the same tax increases which would be proposed by a future Gov. Schwarzenegger. Furthermore, California Republicans will then be tarred by the same fiscal irresponsibility that now sticks only to their Democratic rivals, which, combined with their contemplated Schwarzeneggerian abandonment of cultural conservatives, will leave them wholly without a raison d'etre.

Pragmatism in politics is self-defeating in the long run. It is a euphemism for the slow sacrifice of one's principles. The constant substitution of "electable" moderates for principled conservatives is what repeatedly kills the Republican Party and prevents it from ever realizing even a small part of its platform when it is in power. It is particularly ironic when the electable moderates show themselves to be nothing of the sort, which in this particular case has already happened when the managing editor of the seminal National Review abjures the Great Teutonic Hope in no uncertain terms.

And those so-called Republicans who would drive a principled conservative like Tom McClintock from the race should hang their heads in shame. If they cannot fight for this candidate, they may as well abandon the battle altogether, for they are useless soldiers. It is better to spend 40 years in the political wilderness than to forsake one's soul for all the kingdoms of the world, much less four years in Sacramento.

Still worse, however, are the right-side commentators who urge conservatives to abandon their principles and line up behind this false Republican god. To sacrifice your own soul to the naked pursuit of power is bad enough, to tempt others to do likewise is not just the ultimate in negative campaigning, it is pure political Satanism.


Vox Day is a novelist and Christian libertarian. He is a member of the SFWA, Mensa and the Southern Baptist Convention, and his weekly column is syndicated nationally by Universal Press Syndicate. He has been down with Madden since 1992.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: schwarzeneggerians; voxday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: Robert_Paulson2
There has been no debating. Arnold is an empty suit whose "positions" have been totally focus group driven. His supporters on here refuse to discuss issues. They simply refer to polling data. This is the way Clinton ran his presidency.

I am not surprised that the RINOs won out at the convention. Let's face it, the people there aren't serious. It is like a sporting event. They spend more time drinking themselves into drunken stupors at the hospitality suites than they do discussing anything serious, like the future of our state.

Pathetic.

21 posted on 09/15/2003 3:16:48 AM PDT by ambrose (Member of the McClintock Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
What a nutty article.
22 posted on 09/15/2003 3:18:02 AM PDT by Tempest (Anyone who accepts the LA Times as the truth has no business calling anyone a RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
You've worn em out, ambrose! ;-)

But don't worry, they'll come out in packs before the day is over...

Actually I was trying to lower my intake of daily idiotic post. This thread alone has filled my quota for the day.

23 posted on 09/15/2003 3:21:25 AM PDT by Tempest (Anyone who accepts the LA Times as the truth has no business calling anyone a RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
"ARNOLD IS A REPUBLICAN" Did you read the article? I didn't like the cheap shot about his father, but the rest was pretty good.Do you really believe that Arnold is a robot also?I do. He is more robot than republican.
24 posted on 09/15/2003 3:22:16 AM PDT by novacation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Satanic Schwarzeneggerians


25 posted on 09/15/2003 3:25:47 AM PDT by ambrose (Member of the McClintock Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
Hehe...

Try this one for a little more lighthearted approach to the matters at hand:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/982602/posts?page=40

26 posted on 09/15/2003 3:26:24 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Right-wing Crazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The Republican Party is becoming more moderate and more inclusive... This is the 21st century, not the 12th.
27 posted on 09/15/2003 3:27:22 AM PDT by tkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
I can't tell much difference between the Republicans and Democrats anymore.Can you?Arnold is better than Crustamante,but is he really much different from the democrats?'We must provide everything for the people." The qoute that will live in infamy.
28 posted on 09/15/2003 3:27:39 AM PDT by novacation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
And God Save my America

Bump!

29 posted on 09/15/2003 3:35:33 AM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
roflmao....
30 posted on 09/15/2003 3:45:21 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (robert the rino...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
See post 27.

The RINOs will spin an Arnold victory, should it happen, as nothing more than an unqualified endorsement for Amnesty, more spending, taxes, etc. Can you live with that?
31 posted on 09/15/2003 3:48:48 AM PDT by ambrose (Member of the McClintock Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Do you have any guiding values or principles in terms of your political outlook? If so, what are they?
32 posted on 09/15/2003 3:49:42 AM PDT by ambrose (Member of the McClintock Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Still worse, however, are the right-side commentators who urge conservatives to abandon their principles and line up behind this false Republican god. To sacrifice your own soul to the naked pursuit of power is bad enough, to tempt others to do likewise is not just the ultimate in negative campaigning, it is pure political Satanism.

Deja vu, all over again.

Next, FR develops hard drive problems, Arnold wins, does everything socialist, but nobody will say anything about it...oh, and all the "T" keys will be missing from the keyboards in the CA Governor's mansion.

33 posted on 09/15/2003 3:50:40 AM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yeti
Haha. Yes, I would expect some mass amnesia on the part of the Arnold boosters on here, once he proposes his giant tax hike (based on fiscal emergency revealed in his "audit", no doubt).

What's amazing is that many of these same Arnold Groupies go on other threads and bash RINOs like Arlen Specter. How is Arlen different from Arnold other than in looks and charisma? Have we all become that superficial?
34 posted on 09/15/2003 3:58:23 AM PDT by ambrose (Member of the McClintock Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"Do you have any guiding values or principles in terms of your political outlook? If so, what are they?"

Personal responsibility vs. big government interference.
35 posted on 09/15/2003 4:07:15 AM PDT by tkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I disagree, as you know, with your premise... as do other "rinos" like "robert".

But I can LIVE with any kind of "spinning" and I will do my best to LIVE even if taxes go up, amnesty is granted to illegals and spending for government "services" goes ever higher.

Like it, NO... Live anyhow... YES.

AND I think it will not be as you fear.
If Arnie wins, and does NOT work in support of a large, blanket amnesty, higher taxes and continued explosion of spending... would you consider your "glass" 10 percent full?

I guarantee you that whatever is in the glass, if arnie is elected, would be far more than will be in it if Busty is elected... And Tom, who will probably not win the governors chair, will most likely be useful EXACTLY where he is... on the Senate Floor, leveraging the financial details amongst his colleagues.

If arnie gets elected and vetoes a democraptic bill... I expect that we will at least be able to uphold the veto. Arnie will cut deals to get SOME of our stuff through... and after the election next year, we might even see a balance of power change in the California legislature.

why am I confident that the state will MOVE to the right, with Arnie... because for the last several years, it has gone as far left as is humanly possible... it HAS to swing back to center.

But this has been thrashed to death.
You vote your conscience, I will vote mine.
Folks are tired of this stuff. And frankly so am I.
36 posted on 09/15/2003 4:11:52 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (robert the rino...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Yeti
Please explain the missing "t" keys thingie...

37 posted on 09/15/2003 4:16:50 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (robert the rino...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen; ambrose
Thinking of voting for McClintock instead of for Arnold ?? (post #544) ...

Cruz 'for me everything, for you, nada da** thing' Bustamante ...


Separated at birth ?? ...

38 posted on 09/15/2003 6:16:12 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yall

California GOP Insiders: McClintock Will Drop Out

A vote for ...

... instead of for ...


Elvis "America"
(Click here or on the pic)


"Hasta La Vista, Baby !!"
(Click here or on the pics !)

Will bring you the NEXT Governor of California !! ...


Separated at birth ?? ...

39 posted on 09/15/2003 6:22:01 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Please explain the missing "t" keys thingie...

I'm still tryin' to figure that one out too. "T" for Tom ?? They think Tom will win the next time ?? ...

I give up ...


40 posted on 09/15/2003 6:23:45 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson