Montreal man linked to Clark controversy - Presidential candidate claims pressure

The Star ^ | 9/18/03

[Guillermo]

No, it wasn't Bush who told me to say this, it was my brothers wifes uncles cousins' previous cat owners half-sister who told me.

Anyways, I'm just a patsy for the Clintons, but I enjoy being used and abused.

[Peach]

He's blaming me because yesterday on another Clark thread GoOrdnance first claimed there did not exist a transcript of Clark saying the White House called him on 9/11 to exert pressure.

When I provided him with a transcript from MSNBC's web site, he changed tactics and then said I was mis-reading the transcript!

He still to this day refuses to acknowledge that "his candidate" has lied repeatedly and been caught lying - about a very important matter, I might add.

We can lead them to water, but we cannot make them drink (or read, apparently).

[Dog]

Mom look at Dio's link in post 11.....get to jnow Mr. Thomas Hecht.

[Dog]

jnow=know

[BurbankKarl]

there are no think tanks in Canada.

[Peach]

You are posting again from that silly web site, I see, spin something.

I'll publish the MSNBC link in a later post.

[Peach]

We are dealing with a DU'er, I'm quite sure, although a review of his In Forum posts looks quite conservative.

Regardless, here is the link to the MSNBC/Russert transcript with Clark in which Clark states the White House called him to pressure him on 9/11.http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/927000.asp

[SpinyNorman]

At least the Son of Sam killer had the good sense to say his dog told him to do the things he did! Clark just hears voices from non-existent think tanks.....

[Allan]

bump

[cookcounty]

INTERLOCUTOR: "General Clark, did you or did you not receive a call from Mr. Hecht on the 11th of September?"

GENERAL CLARK: "Uh, let me refer to counsel."

(General Clark leans over to consult with his lawyer, William Blythe Jefferson Clinton of Clinton, Clinton and Cheatem)

GENERAL CLARK: "Uh, Sir, it depends on what the meaning of "did" is.",

[PhiKapMom]

Thanks for the info. Obvious that Clark is nothing but a front for the Clintons. Just announced on Fox that he had to cancel his speech to the Citadel today because of the Hurricane.

Now the other RAT candidates are demanding that he answer if he is going to be in the first debate next week that he is eligible for that is being hosted by the WSJ about the economy.

Now the question is -- Will he or will he not participate in the debate? It would be interesting to watch because if he doesn't participate, maybe the RAT candidates will go after Clark instead of President Bush!

[Peach]

hahahaha. Yes, we can all see how you are supporting President Bush, by spinning for Clark.

[geedee]

"White House Smite House," says Clark, "what's the big deal? Since when did us Democrats have to be precise?"

[alnick]

You've been shown the transcript where Clark made the claim. You, like most democrats, aren't the least bit interested in what's true.

You're obviously a troll and will never admit the truth.

Buh-bye.

[MEG33]

LOL!

[Peach]

GEN. CLARK: I think it was an effort to convince the American people to do something, and I think there was an immediate determination right after 9/11 that Saddam Hussein was one of the keys to winning the war on terror. Whether it was the need just to strike out or whether he was a linchpin in this, there was a concerted effort during the fall of 2001 starting immediately after 9/11 to pin 9/11 and the terrorism problem on Saddam Hussein.
MR. RUSSERT: By who? Who did that?
GEN. CLARK: Well, it came from the White House, it came from people around the White House. It came from all over. I got a call on 9/11. I was on CNN, and I got a call at my home saying, “You got to say this is connected. This is state-sponsored terrorism. This has to be connected to Saddam Hussein.”