Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question time [The Debate over Debates Controversy...]
Sac Bee ^ | 9-18 | Dan Weintraub

Posted on 09/18/2003 10:29:10 PM PDT by ambrose

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:57:59 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

AP has moved a story saying Bustamante, McClintock, Camejo and Hufffington are drafting a letter in which they will threaten to boycot next week's debate unless the sponsors drop 12 questions submitted by the public and already released and use a traditional format instead. It's not clear from the story whether the letter will really come together. There seems to be some question whether all the candidates are really willing to threaten to drop out. Stan Statham, president of the California Broadcasters Assn, says the format will not change.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/18/2003 10:29:11 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
So let's all be clear about the truth:

1. It is unknown whether this letter really exists or who signed off on it...

2. The debate is actually less scripted than most debates because it allows interplay between the candidates whereas most debates these days only allow questions from the "journalists"
2 posted on 09/18/2003 10:33:44 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
ping
3 posted on 09/18/2003 10:40:29 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
There was certainly a lot of interplay in the LA Press Club debate, too bad arnie wasn't there if this last debate falls thru, for whatever potential reasons.

Arnie's soundbite re: the debate next week, "This is the Super Bowl of All the debates." :-\

He got a bye from all the others, I reckun. ;-)

I look forward to a sack of river rocks being in one of the chairs in place of Cruz. :-)
4 posted on 09/18/2003 11:05:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (I brake for RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"I look forward to a sack of river rocks being in one of the chairs in place of Cruz."

You'd get much better leadership from a sack of river rocks than from Bustamante.

5 posted on 09/18/2003 11:29:29 PM PDT by Imal (The World According to Imal: http://imal.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I heard Tom McClintock's spokesman on the Mark Williams Show-Night Talk Live" state that they teamed up with Huffington & Bustamonte (and I believe Camejo) to state that they do not plan to attend the debate at CSU Sacramento on 9/24. They will extend an invitation to him to debate where the questions are not pre-screened, and therefore not scripted.

Mark Williams - The War Room & NightTalkLIVE! Weeknights 7-10 PM
6 posted on 09/18/2003 11:41:48 PM PDT by Pro-Bush (Awareness is what you know before you know anything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

7 posted on 09/19/2003 8:44:57 AM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey; Tempest; onyx; My2Cents; EggsAckley; Victoria Delsoul; kattracks; PhiKapMom; ...
The unstated point of the report, if accurate, evidently being:

Great true-blue Republican conservative standard-bearer the scorched-earthers are about to torch California for, eh wot?

Dan

8 posted on 09/19/2003 8:51:53 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush
I heard Tom McClintock's spokesman on the Mark Williams Show-Night Talk Live" state that they teamed up with Huffington & Bustamonte (and I believe Camejo) to state that they do not plan to attend the debate at CSU Sacramento on 9/24. They will extend an invitation to him to debate where the questions are not pre-screened, and therefore not scripted.

Wow, pre-screening of questions. That is like, uhh, a debate I've never heard of, since it's durn hard to schedule a debate when no one knows what the topic is.

Teamed up with Bustamante and Huffington? This is the gallant ultra-conservative we're supposed to follow blindly because he supposedly will bring conservative issues to the fore? Yeah, right. It would have been absolutely wonderful to have seen somewhere in Tom's TV commercial something about 'Yes on the Recall' or something anti-Davis.

Our enemies are the Democrats and the idiotic things they've done to our state, and are doing to our state. Not fellow Republicans. RINO watchers, what do you call someone who joins with Democrats to trash a Republican?
9 posted on 09/19/2003 8:55:07 AM PDT by kingu (I'm voting for Arnold, if I'm allowed to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kingu; Tamsey; DoughtyOne; Hillary's Lovely Legs
Yep. The reputed true-blue conservative Republican.

What part of "conservative" is it to break your word, pout and throw a tantrum unless you can get your own way?

What part of "Republican" is it to team up with the Demo frontrunner to try to trash the Republican frontrunner?

For the still-thinking, those are problems.

For McClintock's Carvilles here, no problemo.

Dan
10 posted on 09/19/2003 8:59:29 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
On Monday, this group convenes:

The 9th Circuit justice breakdown for the rehearing (per KFI radio, Los Angeles):

7 CLINTON appointments
1 CARTER appointment
1 BUSH SR. appointment
2 REAGAN appointments

11 posted on 09/19/2003 4:20:58 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Yeah. Doesn't matter who's President, right?

Tell me that one again.

{ shudder }
12 posted on 09/19/2003 5:10:54 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
LOL! Bump.
13 posted on 09/19/2003 9:22:34 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul ( The Tombot's motto is: "I'm opposed to whatever Arnold says, and most definitely against it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson