Charlie Rangel (D-Al Qaeda): "Clark can save this G*dd*amn Nation from self-destruction"

Time Magazine ^ | September 21, 2003 | KAREN TUMULTY

[upchuck]

"National security will be the primary topic during next year's election, and I believe he is the person who can beat George Bush," said Kate Lawrence, 52, a secretary from Dubuque...

Hey Kate, what planet are you from? Unless something dramatic happens and several million new jobs appear in the next nine months or so, the 2004 election will be all about the economy.

Charlie Rangel is WORSE than a treasonous bastard.

[AngrySpud]

" ... pulling out his buzzing Blackberry ... "

What the heck is that? Sounds rather elitist to me.

[AngrySpud]

" ... just ask those who have worked under him ... "

Excellent point. Though I have a feeling he will dig up an old buddy from his Vietnam service who can be quoted favorably.

[finnman69]

Thank you Mr. Rangel for the soundbyte. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

[SkyPilot]

Rangle calling the USA "goddam nation". This pig slipped and revealed his disrespect for America.

Not to mention the Almighty.

[AF68]

"I have noticed lately, in his appearences on Hannity and Colmes, that Charlie Rangel seems to have gone 'round the bend."

Like most of the other Rats, Charlie Rangel's choo-choo has gone around the bend and came off the tracks.

[clintonh8r]

Well, if this "nation" is "goddamn" it's because it's populated with shitbags like Charlie Rangle.

[proud American in Canada]

"I want the United States to succeed."

Really? I don't think any Democrat really does.

I am so glad this quote from Rangel appeared in Time magazine. I hope it wakes even more people up to how traitorous liberal democrats can be.

[dennisw]

You are right about that. Rangel shows his disdain for G_D and America. I may cuss but I never say what Rangel did.

[VOA]

I've yet to hear a member of the US military (even some who served with Clark and respect
his service) say that it's a good idea for him to run for President.

[ChadGore]

(D-Al Qaeda)

[jocon307]

"What the heck is that? Sounds rather elitist to me."

It is. They are little palm-pilot like things. I don't know if there is much difference between on and another, besides brand names. You can get e-mail on them, and they are organizers, I guess by now some give you internet access too.

[holden]

It's the Personal Digital Assistant through which Gail usually "talks" to him.

HF

[steveegg]

While your title is quite descriptive, please include the original title in the future and put stuff like what the Al-Qaida representative said in parentheses in the future. It helps the search engine out a lot.

[Terry Mross]

I'll never understand how someone can be so concerned about national security then say she wants someone to beat Bush. This nation has been pretty damn secure since 9/11. I think the most important campaign issue to this old bag Kate is getting rid of Bush.

[TopQuark]

"He can save this goddam nation from self-destruction,"

I always felt proud to be a parted of such a blessed nation. This statement alone, in my view, qualifies this men to be recalled.

[TopQuark]

"He can save this goddam nation from self-destruction,"

Even the conservatives seem to miss this important point: that is exacly what was said to support the advancement of Hitler in Germany.

[SJackson]

If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

[dc-zoo]

Well if clark has a meeting with rangle he definitly will be meeting with the "black kakka's".

[CIB-173RDABN]

"...several million new jobs appear in the next nine months or so, the 2004 election will be all about the economy."

---

Just because something was true in the past, does not mean it will be true in the future, especially when you are dealing with people.

Clinton was able to win over the first Bush (with a lot of help from his friends in the media). That does not mean that the current President Bush will lose over the economy.

There are many more factors in play, then simply the economy. Perhaps after the 2004 elections, the common wisdom will catch up to the shift that took place first with the internet, and sites like FreeRepublic, and second with 9/11.