Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Army (Islamic Chaplain) Capt. Yee and the charges he may face
Internet Haganah ^

Posted on 09/22/2003 7:47:18 PM PDT by Happy2BMe

Capt. Yee and the charges he may face:

* Sedition and Mutiny, violation of Article 94, UCMJ

* Aiding the enemy, violation of Article 104, UCMJ

* Spying, violation of Article 106, UCMJ

* Espionage, violation of Article 106a, UCMJ

* Failure to obey a general order, violation of Article 92, UCMJ

All Punitive Articles



TOPICS: War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; chaplain; gitmo; jamesyee; mutiny; sedition; spying; terrorism; treason; ucmj; yee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
How about some good old fashioned American Justice?
1 posted on 09/22/2003 7:47:19 PM PDT by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
American Justice ping!
2 posted on 09/22/2003 7:49:00 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
We can only hope....
3 posted on 09/22/2003 7:49:06 PM PDT by CheneyChick ("I VILL KLEAN HAUS" -Gov. Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls; af_vet_1981; risk; river rat; Travis McGee; swarthyguy; Squantos; daisyscarlett; ...
Islamic terrorist activity in our military forces ping!

Please pass to other military types.

:~)

4 posted on 09/22/2003 7:58:51 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
bump
5 posted on 09/22/2003 8:01:37 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LadyX
Glassy-eyed PING.
6 posted on 09/22/2003 8:03:18 PM PDT by martin_fierro (Great Googlymoogly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
It would do wonders for our political and judicial systems if someone were actually tried, convicted, and executed for treason. Life imprisonment for sedition or execution for espionage would be a step in the right direction, though all it would take is one Clinton or Dean in the White House to set the criminal free.
7 posted on 09/22/2003 8:15:22 PM PDT by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4412
"Life imprisonment for sedition or execution for espionage would be a step in the right direction, though all it would take is one Clinton or Dean in the White House to set the criminal free."

Clinton? Isn't he the one who let Osama bin Ladin go?

8 posted on 09/22/2003 8:20:14 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VOA; CheneyChick; martin_fierro; omega4412
Punitive Articles of the UCMJ
Article 94—Mutiny and sedition

Text.

(a) "Any person subject to this chapter who--

(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuse, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;

(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;

(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.

(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct."

Elements.

(1) Mutiny by creating violence or disturbance.

(a) That the accused created violence or a disturbance; and

(b) That the accused created this violence or disturbance with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority.

(2) Mutiny by refusing to obey orders or perform duty.

(a) That the accused refused to obey orders or otherwise do the accused's duty;

(b) That the accused in refusing to obey orders or perform duty acted in concert with another person or persons; and

(c) That the accused did so with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority.

(3) Sedition.

(a) That the accused created revolt, violence, or disturbance against lawful civil authority;

(b) That the accused acted in concert with another person or persons; and

(c) That the accused did so with the intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of that authority.

(4) Failure to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition.


(a) That an offense of mutiny or sedition was committed in the presence of the accused; and

(b) That the accused failed to do the accused's utmost to prevent and suppress the mutiny or sedition.

(5) Failure to report a mutiny or sedition.

(a) That an offense of mutiny or sedition occurred;

(b) That the accused knew or had reason to believe that the offense was taking place; and

(c) That the accused failed to take all reasonable means to inform the accused's superior commissioned officer or commander of the offense.

(6) Attempted mutiny.

(a) That the accused committed a certain overt act;

(b) That the act was done with specific intent to commit the offense of mutiny;

(c) That the act amounted to more than mere preparation; and

(d) That the act apparently tended to effect the commission of the offense of mutiny.

Explanation.

(1) Mutiny. Article 94( a)(1) defines two types of mutiny, both requiring an intent to usurp or override military authority.

(a) Mutiny by creating violence or disturbance. Mutiny by creating violence or disturbance may be committed by one person acting alone or by more than one acting together.

(b) Mutiny by refusing to obey orders or perform duties. Mutiny by refusing to obey orders or perform duties requires collective insubordination and necessarily includes some combination of two or more persons in resisting lawful military authority. This concert of insubordination need not be preconceived, nor is it necessary that the insubordination be active or violent. It may consist simply of a persistent and concerted refusal or omission to obey orders, or to do duty, with an insubordinate intent, that is, with an intent to usurp or override lawful military authority. The intent may be declared in words or inferred from acts, omissions, or surrounding circumstances.

(2) Sedition. Sedition requires a concert of action in resistance to civil authority. This differs from mutiny by creating violence or disturbance. See subparagraph c(1)( a) above.

(3) Failure to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition. "Utmost" means taking those measures to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition which may properly be called for by the circumstances, including the rank, responsibilities, or employment of the person concerned. "Utmost" includes the use of such force, including deadly force, as may be reasonably necessary under the circumstances to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition.

(4) Failure to report a mutiny or sedition. Failure to "take all reasonable means to inform" includes failure to take the most expeditious means available. When the circumstances known to the accused would have caused a reasonable person in similar circumstances to believe that a mutiny or sedition was occurring, this may establish that the accused had such "reason to believe" that mutiny or sedition was occurring. Failure to report an impending mutiny or sedition is not an offense in violation of Article 94. But see paragraph 16c(3) (dereliction of duty).

(5) Attempted mutiny. For a discussion of attempts, see paragraph 4.

Lesser included offenses.

(1) Mutiny by creating violence or disturbance.

(a) Article 90--assault on commissioned officer

(b) Article 91--assault on warrant, noncommissioned, or petty officer

(c) Article 94--attempted mutiny

(d) Article 116--riot; breach of peace

(e) Article 128--assault

(f) Article 134--disorderly conduct

(2) Mutiny by refusing to obey orders or perform duties.

(a) Article 90--willful disobedience of commissioned officer

(b) Article 91--willful disobedience of warrant, noncommissioned, or petty officer

(c) Article 92--failure to obey lawful order

(d) Article 94--attempted mutiny

(3) Sedition.

(a) Article 116--riot; breach of peace

(b) Article 128--assault

(c) Article 134--disorderly conduct

(d) Article 80--attempts

Maximum punishment.

For all offenses under Article 94, death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

Next Article > Article 95—Resistance, flight, breach of arrest, and escape >

Above Information from Manual for Court Martial, 2002, Chapter 4, Paragraph 18


9 posted on 09/22/2003 8:25:32 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Does anybody know if the Naval prison in Portsmouth is still operating? Since this guy is a commissioned officer, we wouldn't want him to be insulted by putting him in the care of civilians at Leavenworth, would we?

Of course not! Being a military man, he should be with his military brothers! Like the Marine guards at Portsmouth Naval prison!

You Navy and Marine vets will understand the sarcasm here.
10 posted on 09/22/2003 8:33:43 PM PDT by navyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe; Kathy in Alaska; MoJo2001; LindaSOG; LaDivaLoca; bentfeather; Bethbg79; Iowa Granny; ...
"Please pass to other military types"

PING
11 posted on 09/22/2003 8:35:04 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (THANK YOU TROOPS, PAST AND PRESENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
I'd really like him to live long enough to be interrogated, so Portsmouth is out.
12 posted on 09/22/2003 8:36:31 PM PDT by Poohbah ("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
BTT
13 posted on 09/22/2003 8:38:28 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; archy; Squantos; harpseal; SLB; Matthew James; river rat

Got Rope?


14 posted on 09/22/2003 8:38:48 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
I think it's a plan!
15 posted on 09/22/2003 8:40:36 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
"...we wouldn't want him to be insulted by putting him in the care of civilians at Leavenworth, would we?"

I saw a documentary recently.
There is the Federal Pen at Leavenworth for civilians.
There ALSO is a seperate (different location) Military Discipline Barracks Prison for military.
16 posted on 09/22/2003 8:41:09 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (THANK YOU TROOPS, PAST AND PRESENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
Bump!
17 posted on 09/22/2003 8:45:33 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
" Since this guy is a commissioned officer, we wouldn't want him to be insulted by putting him in the care of civilians at Leavenworth, would we?"

No offense to officers please, but since the propensity for officers to get caught breaking the UCMJ as much as enlited types, officers often get "special rehabilatative treatment" in military detention centers.

Yee will have his own "program."

The first offense alone can carry the death penalty (legally).

Yee may be looking for those virgins sooner than he thinks.

18 posted on 09/22/2003 8:46:18 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
He is not subject to Civillian Justice. The miltary is a lot faster and probly more fair than civi. justice. His punishment [if any] will be very swift & sever.
[SORRY ABOUT THE SPELLING, my hand got stupid!]
19 posted on 09/22/2003 8:47:06 PM PDT by Knightsofswing (sic semper tranyis [death to tryants!!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Guess what, folks...there are convicted chaplains in Leavenworth as we speak.
20 posted on 09/22/2003 8:48:30 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson