Did you see that bridge in California (I think) last week that had a fuel truck roll over underneath it and the heat from the fire of the fuel melted the steel and the bridge collapsed?
Also, I don't know for sure but I thought there were four columns in the middle of the WTC Buildings 1 and 2 that was the main support for the building. These big beams basically ran up the middle of the towers. Those four beams were the main support of the building. Not a chicken wire type structure. I may be wrong though. I will have to look that up.
The whole point of bringing up the DU post is that it is so self-evidently risible.
Anyone who understands Archimedes’ principle knows that melting sea ice cannot cause sea levels to rise. Anyone who does not understand Archimedes’ principle ought not to be offering opinions on intractably difficult issues like Global Warming.
People who pretend to “know” that the fuel fire was not sufficient to bring down the WTC are simply delusional.