Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assassin secretly deported after JFK killed
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, September 24, 2003

Posted on 09/24/2003 12:04:04 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Just two days after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, a suspected killer and known foreign terrorist was captured in Dallas, Texas.

The U.S. government was aware the man had received rigorous training in a foreign military and was a member of a covert paramilitary organization that already had murdered dozens, if not hundreds of people, including military officers, high ranking police officials and democratically elected politicians.


President Kennedy speaking in Fort Worth the morning of Nov. 22, 1963

Amazingly, according to the authors of an explosive new book promising to unravel the 40-year mystery of who killed JFK, there is no evidence to show he ever even was questioned about his presence in Dallas so soon after Kennedy's murder.

Instead, say co-authors Brad O'Leary and L.E. Seymour in the upcoming WND Books release "Triangle of Death," the man was picked up and quickly and quietly flown out of the United States under a cloak of secrecy.

Although the book has not yet been released to bookstores, it has already shot up to 218 on the Amazon chart just from initial pre-sales.

The story of the mysterious assassin is revealed in a CIA document backing the author's compelling argument that President Kennedy was killed Nov. 22, 1963, as the result of a massive conspiracy between the CIA-installed government of South Vietnam, the French global heroin syndicate and the New Orleans Mafia.

"This deportation, in fact, and the sinister man in question, have been the subject of repeated U.S. Justice Department investigations for more than three decades," the authors write, "investigations that have been deliberately withheld from the American public and the world."

The suspicious expulsion also never was reported to the Warren Commission, the official investigative body appointed by President Lyndon Johnson.

"This revelation can only be described as colossal in the realm of assassination research, and one would accordingly expect the league of Kennedy researchers to jump all over it, examine it to every degree, and then include its startling importance in the overall field of their work," O'Leary and Seymour write. "But that never happened."

The CIA document reveals the man was a French assassin – wanted by France for subversion – who was in Fort Worth on the morning of Nov. 22, 1963, and in Dallas in the afternoon.

On that morning, President Kennedy was in Forth Worth, giving a speech in front of the Hotel Texas. In the afternoon, in Dallas, he was shot to death.

Noting all U.S. deportations were executed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the authors ask: "Why would an authority of the United States Justice Department deport a known terrorist?"

One would believe, they write, that he would have been "apprehended and imprisoned, or at least sent back to France where the legal authorities there had already clearly deemed him an enemy of the state."

"But there's no evidence to suggest [he] was ever even questioned about his presence in Dallas so soon after Kennedy's murder."

The French, who believe he was expelled to either Mexico or Canada, identified him as a member of the right-wing extremist group, the OAS, Organisation de l'Armée Secrète, comprised of deserters from the French Army in opposition to President Charles de Gaulle's granting of independence to Algeria. The members of the "Secret Army" were involved in countless acts of terrorism and assassination.

"Triangle of Death" answers questions surrounding this previously dismissed episode and pieces it together with recently declassified federal documents, material supplied by the KGB, information from the Bonano crime family, documents obtained from a French court and the only interview done with a French witness previously only debriefed by the FBI and CIA.

As WorldNetDaily reported, newly released tapes of Johnson's telephone conversations also corroborate the central premise the book, showing the Kennedy White House did not merely tolerate or encourage the murder of its ally, South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem, but organized and executed it, writes Fox News White House correspondent James Rosen in the Weekly Standard.

Coup d'état

"Triangle of Death" – which includes details of a first-time-ever crime scene re-creation at Dealey Plaza – shows how Kennedy planned and developed the coup d'état that resulted in the political murders of the Catholic president, Diem, and his two brothers just 22 days before his death. The U.S. State Department suppressed this information for more than 30 years.


Evidence includes federal documents that only recently have been declassified or released – exclusively to the authors.

The authors reveal a Mafia chieftain, who employed Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald's uncle, confessed to federal officers he had been directly involved in Kennedy's murder.

In addition, O'Leary and Seymour recount how the United States and the Soviet Union both went on high military alert immediately after Kennedy's death, bringing the world to the brink of nuclear annihilation.

Other facts uncovered by the book include:

Two chapters of this book have already been used to make two different television specials – one on PBS and the other on the History Channel.

Co-author O'Leary, involved in politics for more than 25 years, publishes the O'Leary Report, one of the most influential publications in American politics. His clients have included more than 60 political and public figures, including Sen. John Tower and Texas Gov. John Connolly, who rode in Kennedy's car when he was shot. O'Leary also hosted his own radio show on NBC for seven years and was a contributing columnist for USA Today Weekend magazine. He currently is president of Associated Television News in Los Angeles.

O'Leary is available for media interviews through Shirley and Banister and Associates at (703) 739-5920.

His co-author, Seymour, is a free-lance writer and author of 15 novels, including "The Stickmen" and "Operator 'B'."

False claims?

O'Leary and Seymour note investigative bodies of the U.S. government have made numerous claims, including that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin; that only two shots hit their target, that the bullets fired that day all came from the sixth floor of the Texas Schoolbook Depository; and that Kennedy was killed because he was preparing to pull all U.S. troops out of Vietnam.


The authors insist all of these claims are false and are designed to placate the American public and distract them from the facts of the case.

They acknowledge most readers will find it difficult to accept that Kennedy authorized the overthrow of the Catholic government of South Vietnam and the assassination of Diem, South Vietnam's democratically elected, constitutional president.

After all, Kennedy had generously pledged American troops, military equipment and tax dollars to protect South Vietnam from the threat of communism.

But the authors of "Triangle of Death" provide evidence Kennedy personally asked a high-ranking U.S. military officer to assassinate Diem, who was a political disaster-in-the-making for the president.

The events were set into motion when a Buddhist leader named Quang Duc calmly sat down in a Saigon street June 11, 1963, soaked himself with gasoline, lit a match and burned himself to death.

The news swept through the world, and when the full extent of Diem's brutality toward the Buddhists became apparent, America immediately began to ask itself the obvious questions, O'Leary and Seymour write: "Why is the U.S. supporting a foreign government that engages in religious persecution? Why is President Kennedy sending U.S. military personnel to help the government of a man who puts his own people into concentration camps?"

The authors point out: "Until then, America believed the increasing number of U.S. men and women being sent to South Vietnam – close to 15,000 by June 1963 – and the $1.2-million-per-day aid package were to help the South Vietnamese fight the deadly Vietcong. But literally overnight, the U.S. was internationally perceived as a bunch of buffoons who were propping up a tyrant."


South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem was assassinated Nov. 1, 1963

With the next U.S. presidential election just over a year away, they write, "Kennedy was infuriated; moreover, he and his political consultants were scared."

People "already believed that Kennedy had stolen the election, based on suspicious vote-counting in Illinois; a Catholic U.S. president supporting a Catholic fanatic who was intent on persecuting another religious group would provide them with all the ammunition they needed in November of '64."

The authors contend they have irrefutable evidence the Kennedy White House supported a coup d'etat against the government of South Vietnam and the assassination of President Diem.

"More than anything else," they write, "this was the rich ground in which a counter-conspiracy was planted, the conspiracy that led to President Kennedy's own assassination."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: assassination; bookreview; conspiracy; grassyknoll; jfk; jfkassassination; jfkconspiracy; jfkkilled; kennedyassassination; tinfoil; triangleofdeath
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-230 next last
To: Leatherneck_MT
Again, Oswald's brother and hunting partner thought he was a good shot. Was he part of the conspiracy too?
201 posted on 10/08/2003 7:21:04 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
I really don't care if Oswald's brother and hunting partner thought he was a good shot.

His military record proves he was marginal at best.

That is an indisputable fact.
202 posted on 10/08/2003 7:53:52 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (If you continue to do what you've always done, you will continue to get what you've always got)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT
I can see you have spent a lot of time looking at this issue and I guess we will just have to disagree.

I stongly believe Oswald was the lone gunman and all of the physical evidence points this way. Oswald was a commie nut job who hated Kennedy for his position on Cuba. He defected to the Soviet Union and had a Russian wife. He carried a long wrapped package to work that day. At least one of the shots came from the TSBD as proven by the Connally trajectory. There are nummerous photos of people looking up at the TSBD after one of the shots was fired.

Finally, if you are going to set Oswald up as a patsy, you don't put a second or third gunman at a different location, like the grassy knoll, because it would create conflicting forensic evidence. Nobody that stupid would be able to cover their tracks for 40 years.
203 posted on 10/08/2003 8:33:55 AM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
I have spent many years studying this. I'm not going to try to convince you to change your mind, and I do respect that you believe that LHO was the Lone Gunman. We will have to agree to disagree on that point. In my professional opinion, Lee did not have the skill to make the shots he's accused of making. Nobody will ever be able to convince me to the contrary.

Personally I believe that Lee was an Intelligence Operative. There are too many things in his past that indicate a connection to either the DIA or the CIA.
204 posted on 10/08/2003 9:12:08 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (If you continue to do what you've always done, you will continue to get what you've always got)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
You're not going to get anywhere with the detractors. They don't understand the Zapruder film at all. They'll continue to bring up nonsense like a missing brain and ignore the skull and head pictures and x-rays. After all, no one stole his skull, did they? They are fully aware of "cratering" but that doesn't fit into their dreamworld.

A bunched up jacket becomes "evidence" but the actual measured picture of the back wound is ignored.

They continue a line of supposed people on the knoll and ignore the people who were standing next to the fence who didn't hear or see anyone behind the fence. The picture of the people standing in front of the fence look pretty calm despite a so-called bullet whizzing past their ears.

The funniest one is the so-called half blind witness because he didn't wear his glasses that day. They neglect to say that he was far-sighted.

It's all very amusing if you have the time and provides an idea of credibilty for other threads.

I'm still wondering how they make the excuse a number of WWII bullets can only go two inches into a person and disappear.
205 posted on 10/08/2003 12:46:25 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT
You don't care!? Obviously, no factual information matters to you. His military record was contradictory. Heck, I'm a pretty good chess player but I have my off days too. Oswald might have too. Do you think his brother lied?
206 posted on 10/08/2003 1:34:03 PM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Oswald was a Sharpshooter. That means that half the Marine Corps is supposed to be lousy shots.

I can hear the D.I right now:

"All of you pansies can't shoot so we're going to give you a shortened course of less than a hundred yards. Don't worry about passing. You can miss one third of your shots."

Go Army!!
207 posted on 10/08/2003 2:08:23 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Obviously you haven't followed or looked at anything I have posted before. So before you come in here and start accusing me of being oblivious to FACTS, maybe you should go back and read them.

There are NO factual contradictions in LHO's Military Record. If there are then point them out. Line and Verse please.

The man was NOT a skilled marksman. He couldn't hit the broadside of a barn with a bull fiddle on his initial Qual day.

On his brothers assertation that he was a "good shot". I PROFESSIONALLY disagree with him. I trained Marine Riflemen, I know what kind of shot Oswald was from his military record.

The man was a marginal shot at best. Period.

Did his brother Lie? I don't now, I don't care. The reason I don't care is because his record (Lee's) speaks for itself. THAT is THE fact in this case. It's on record with the Military and has never been changed. It never WILL be changed. His brother can change his testimony at any time he so chooses. The Military record will not change under any circumstances.
208 posted on 10/08/2003 5:41:48 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (If you continue to do what you've always done, you will continue to get what you've always got)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Based on the general Marine Corps ratings, Lt. Col. A. G. Folsom, Jr., head, Records Branch, Personnel Department, Headquarters US. Marine Corps, evaluated the sharpshooter qualification as a "fairly good shot" and a low marksman rating as a "rather poor shot." When asked to explain the different scores achieved by Oswald on the two occasions when he fired for record, Major Anderson said:

...when he fired that [212] he had just completed a very intensive preliminary training period. He had the services of an experienced highly trained coach. He had high motivation. He had presumably a good to excellent rifle and good ammunition. We have nothing here to show under what conditions the B course was fired. It might well have been a bad day for firing the riflewindy, rainy, dark. There is little probability that he had a good, expert coach, and he probably didn't have as high a motivation because he was no longer in recruit training and under the care of the drill instructor. There is some possibility that the rifle he was firing might not have been as good a rifle as the rifle that he was firing in his A course firing, because [he] may well have carried this rifle for quite some time, and it got banged around in normal usage.

Major Anderson concluded:

I would say that as compared to other Marines receiving the same type of training, that Oswald was a good shot, somewhat better than or equal tobetter than the average let us say. As compared to a civilian who had not received this intensive training, he would be considered as a good to excellent shot.

When Sergeant Zahm was asked whether Oswald's Marine Corps training would have made it easier to operate a rifle with a four-power scope, he replied:

Based on that training, his basic knowledge in sight manipulation and trigger squeeze and what not, I would say that he would be capable of sighting that rifle in well, firing it, with 10 rounds.

After reviewing Oswald's marksmanship scores, Sergeant Zahm concluded:

I would say in the Marine Corps he is a good shot, slightly above average, and as compared to the average male of his age throughout the civilian, throughout the United States, that he is an excellent shot.

Ouch, now the members of the Marine Corps are not only lousy shots but they're liars too.
209 posted on 10/08/2003 7:12:22 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT
In any case, oswalds proficancy & maksmanship in the marines doesn't really matter..
The facts of the Reports own timeline on the 3 'oswald' shots show that expert marksmen in ideally recreated circumstances could not exactly duplicate oswalds supposed feat..

-- The JFK case remains open, -- and always will.
210 posted on 10/08/2003 10:04:00 PM PDT by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but Arnie won, & politics as usual lost. Yo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
.
211 posted on 10/12/2003 7:24:10 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
This picture looks like a Photoshop "doctor job". If you look at the airplane and it's angle, it will slam into this fence railing, and will take out this French Assassin.
Also the angle of this man's face is the same as on the "doctor job" pictures on the grassy knoll.
212 posted on 10/12/2003 8:36:34 PM PDT by slickfree (Drudge Vendicated? YES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
More disinformation IMHO.
213 posted on 10/12/2003 8:38:54 PM PDT by ladyinred (Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Tears of Autumn, Charles McCarry (former CIA)
214 posted on 10/12/2003 8:53:22 PM PDT by des
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
"There were of course three rifles found that day: a British .303 Enfield on the roof of the Depository, and a 7.65 Mauser (Mauser stamped on the rifle) witnessed by Deputy Roger Craig. Craig was repeatedly attacked and finally killed. He is the subject of a videotape "Two Men In Dallas" wherein he is interviewed by Mark Lane."

Aren't there photos taken by Dallas new photographers confirming this? I remember seeing photos published somewhere which clearly showed Dallas police removing Mauser rifles from the book depository building later on that day. I just wish I could remember where I saw them published.

215 posted on 10/12/2003 9:21:28 PM PDT by Dazedcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The disinformation machine is still up and running after 40 years. That means they aren't all dead, yet. Sure would like to see the real KGB report. Some Russian is setting on a fortune and doesn't realize it.
216 posted on 10/12/2003 9:23:43 PM PDT by fightu4it (conquest by immigration and subversion spells the end of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slickfree
Yes, it's a hoax available at this site.

http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/photos/photos.html
217 posted on 10/13/2003 4:47:02 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Dazedcat
Nope. That's another of the lies that were put out by the tin-foil hat nuts.

A detective wrote in a report that he thought it was a Mauser when he first saw it.

There are pictures on the internet that shows the Carcano as it was discovered surrounded by boxes. The photographers tracked the rifle out of the building so there's a sequence starting at the boxes, numerous pictures as it's being taken from the building and the displaying of the same rifle at the police headquarters.

The bullets that killed Kennedy and wounded Connelly came from the Carcano and no other Carcano. There was a thread that came from Oswald's particular shirt but it couldn't be traced to his exact shirt. His palm print was found on the rifle but the wood was too grainy to show other prints but his prints were all over the surrounding boxes of the sniper's nest.


218 posted on 10/13/2003 6:44:28 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit; tpaine; Leatherneck_MT
A substantial list of credible witnesses to the large wound at the back of the head appears above at 180.

Floyd Riebe, a medical photographic technician who took the pictures of the body at Bethesda, said that the President had "a big gaping hole in the back of the head." This is more damage than could have been done by a military jacketed bullet; the bullet was probably the explosive, or frangible, type. Riebe was shown the official autopsy photographs, and strongly disagreeing with them, he said, "The two pictures you showed me are not what I saw that night." With regard to the X-rays, which show the face shot away, Riebe said, "It's being phonied someplace. It's make believe." The evidence that could corroborate Riebe's statement--the President's brain--is missing. [Robert J. Groden, The Killing of a President, Viking, 1993, page 82.]

Tom Robinson of Gawler's Funeral Home drew these diagrams:

What Robinson has circled corresponds with the Harper Fragment deemed occipital.

219 posted on 10/13/2003 1:54:20 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT
Charles A. Crenshaw, M.D., JKF Conspiracy of Silence, Signet, 1992.

As you note, Dr. Crenshaw was one of the doctors on duty at Parkland Memorial called to tend Kennedy, enabling first-hand observation of the head wound.

Crenshaw notes the many other medical professionals who share his description of the massive defect at the rear of the skull.

220 posted on 10/13/2003 1:59:57 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson