Replies

Nope. Arnold won on style, Tom won on substance.

I'm going to shock de world by being a bit more pro-McClintock (on this specific issue) than you.

I think they both did reasonably well on style. Tom was his sober, if uncharismatic, self. Arnold had higher highs, but he had lower lows too.

And of course Tom won on substance, as he has been doing all the while. :)

Dear all: The mere fact that you are discussing the pros and cons of the TWO republican candidates means we are DEAD. Have fun debating Tom vs. Arnold right up to the Bustamante victory.
We can not afford to have the republican primary in the general election. It won't work in any state.

I'm a McClintock supporter but I gotta say that I liked it when Schwarzenegger went after Huffington. The only problem I had with him going after Huffington is that I wish Schwarzenegger would have defended Bush when Huffington was blaming our problems on Bush (btw, I thought McClintock should have made some comment in defense of Bush as well). It seems to me that when Huffington tried to blame our problems on Bush this presented an opening for Schwarzenegger to say that our state has been run by Democrats for 5 years and they have run it into the toilet, whereas other states haven't been run by Democrats and they have done just fine with Bush as President.