Skip to comments.
Thinning Ice (NY Times In Full-Panic Mode on "Global Warming")
NY Times ^
| September 25, 2003
Posted on 09/25/2003 10:57:10 AM PDT by presidio9
There has been no end of scholarly studies confirming the gradual rise in global temperatures over the past century. Yet nothing focuses the mind on global warming and its potential consequences quite so sharply as the occasional news flash from some remote corner of the globe documenting startling changes in landscapes once thought to be immutable. Two years ago, for instance, scientists told us that the snows of Kilimanjaro, which inspired Ernest Hemingway's famous short story, could vanish in 15 years, and that the seemingly indestructible glaciers in the Bolivian Andes might not last another 10. Last year brought evidence of disturbing and apparently irreversible changes in Alaska's environment melting permafrost, sagging roads, dying forests arising from an astonishing rise of 5.4 degrees in Alaska's average temperature over the past 30 years.
Now comes more unsettling news: a report from three scientists that the Arctic's largest ice shelf a 150-square-mile, 100-foot-thick mass of ice that has been sitting more or less intact off the northern Canadian coast for 3,000 years is disintegrating. The scientists say the breakup results from a century-long warming trend that has accelerated in the last two years. It is not yet possible, they say, to tie the melting directly to rising atmospheric concentrations of so-called greenhouse gases, or to the human activities chiefly the burning of fossil fuels like coal and oil that create these gases. But they warn that a "critical threshold" has been breached, and that on the other side of this threshold lie abrupt changes in natural conditions we have long taken for granted.
There could be a bright side to all this, if it persuaded the Bush administration and Congress to take the issue of climate change more seriously. That is not happening. Mr. Bush remains fixated on a voluntary approach that offers little hope of meaningful reductions in industrial emissions of carbon dioxide, the main global warming gas. Congress, meanwhile, is fashioning an energy bill that will do little to reduce these emissions, and indeed could increase them by heaping new subsidies on the oil, gas and coal industries. Washington's carapace of denial seems sturdier than any glacier.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: climatechange; doomandgloom; environment; fud; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; iteotwawki; scaretactics; slimeslies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
1
posted on
09/25/2003 10:57:10 AM PDT
by
presidio9
To: presidio9
They should start to use global warning tirades in the liberal media
as contra indicators of colder than normal winters
which is what seems to happen every fall
when they wind up
their greenie beenies
2
posted on
09/25/2003 11:03:01 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: presidio9
To NYT - Climate change happens, get over it.
3
posted on
09/25/2003 11:03:27 AM PDT
by
Humvee
To: presidio9
They should start to use global warning tirades in the liberal media
as contra indicators of colder than normal winters
which is what seems to happen every fall
when they wind up
their greenie beenies
4
posted on
09/25/2003 11:03:27 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: presidio9
..the sky is falling, the sky is falling......
-sorry, can't get excited about this one, we all know how "honest" the NYT is.
5
posted on
09/25/2003 11:06:06 AM PDT
by
tioga
We had a five foot frost level in Maine last winter. We had pipes freeze that had never done so in the 13 years we have been in the house. We had an extended cold snap for a large part of the winter.
I keep hoping that my inland home will become expensive shore front property some day.
6
posted on
09/25/2003 11:07:23 AM PDT
by
Rocket1968
(Democrats will crash and burn in 2004.)
To: Humvee
Change is slow and steady, yet constant. That much is certain. The outcome is not. We'll know when we "get there".
7
posted on
09/25/2003 11:07:23 AM PDT
by
sarasota
To: presidio9
This is a direct result from scientist drilling ice cores over and over again.
8
posted on
09/25/2003 11:10:56 AM PDT
by
CJ Wolf
To: presidio9
Who caused the global cooling that brought the Ice Ages in the past?
Who caused the global warming that brought the Earth out of the Ice ages?
Why do the computer models show the future environment so clearly, yet they can't "predict" the past environment, which we have a historic knowledge of?
9
posted on
09/25/2003 11:13:36 AM PDT
by
RJL
To: presidio9
Total effing idiots! First they say, correctly, that neither greenhouse gases nor human activity are tied to the warming. Then they turn around and say that both Bush and Congress are in denial for refusing to act on junk science that denies that fact. Reading the Slimes will make you think you're living in a nuthouse.
To: LibWhacker
No, it's our house, and the nuts have taken it over, with the help of the Slimes.
To: CJ Wolf
LOL!!
12
posted on
09/25/2003 11:18:22 AM PDT
by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: presidio9
Okay, I admit it. It's me. Every morning, I wake up, open up my front door and spray 2 large cans of CFC containing hairspray into the atmosphere. I guess I'm just busted.
13
posted on
09/25/2003 11:20:33 AM PDT
by
appalachian_dweller
(If we accept responsibility for our own actions, we are indeed worthy of our freedom. – Bill Whittle)
To: presidio9
"Washington's carapace of denial seems sturdier than any glacier."Ooooh, we can say "carapace" instead of "turtle shell" to prop up our own pedantic egos.
14
posted on
09/25/2003 11:23:32 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: presidio9
Looks to me like they are trying to sell more papers....
15
posted on
09/25/2003 11:28:29 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.)
To: presidio9
"Women & Children Affected Most"
16
posted on
09/25/2003 11:29:25 AM PDT
by
ctlpdad
(If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.)
To: RJL
Who caused the global cooling that brought the Ice Ages in the past? Who caused the global warming that brought the Earth out of the Ice ages?
Not just that, but what did Bush know and when did he know it?
sarcasm off
17
posted on
09/25/2003 11:29:58 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(I am ashamed the dixie chicks are from Texas!)
To: presidio9
...It is not yet possible, they say [the scientists], to tie the melting directly to rising atmospheric concentrations of so-called greenhouse gases, or to the human activities... ...but the politically-motivated, office-bound NY journalistic hacks (with no science credentials whatsoever) will go ahead and make that tie anyway.
18
posted on
09/25/2003 11:30:23 AM PDT
by
kidd
To: presidio9
They were just as certain 30 years ago that another ice age was just around the corner. I was watching an old episode of "In Search Of" with Leonard Nimoy the other day and he just flat out stated that scientists were absolutely certain that an ice age was coming. As evidence, 30 years ago, they'd had several very cold winters in a row. And they showed the video of people digging their cars out of great big snow banks.
To: ctlpdad
"Women & Children Affected Most" Have you no sympathy for how Global Warming is affecting minorities?
20
posted on
09/25/2003 11:32:09 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(If [the French] are providing passports, I’m going to ask for Pellegrino)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson