Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kuwait Foils Biochem Arms Smuggling From Iraq
Dow Jones Newswires ^ | October 1 | AP

Posted on 10/01/2003 12:37:34 PM PDT by Pete

KUWAIT CITY (AP)--Kuwaiti security authorities have foiled an attempt to smuggle $60 million worth of chemical weapons and biological warheads from Iraq to an unnamed European country, a Kuwaiti newspaper said Wednesday.

The pro-government Al-Siyassah, quoting an unnamed security source, said the suspects had been watched by security since they arrived in Kuwait and were arrested "in due time." It didn't say when or how the smugglers entered Kuwait or when they were arrested.

The paper said the smugglers might have had accomplices inside Kuwait. It said Interior Minister Sheik Nawwaf Al Ahmed Al Sabah would hand over the smuggled weapons to an FBI agent at a news conference, but didn't say when.

Government officials couldn't be immediately reached for comment.

Iraqi Interior Minister Nouri Al-Badran met Tuesday with Sheik Nawwaf and discussed cooperation between the two countries in security matters. His visit is the first by an Iraqi interior minister to Kuwait since 1990.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armssmuggling; biochem; foiled; iraq; kuwait; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 641-649 next last
To: M1Tanker
Notice the number of people trying to verify the story before they support it. Nobody is jumping to support this without backing it up.

Some are being cautious. Others are not.

At least we seem to be over the Saddam and/or Bin Laden "about to be captured" one-a-day threads.

61 posted on 10/01/2003 12:59:32 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
Your daughter is a BAD girl.
62 posted on 10/01/2003 12:59:54 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I guess we'll have to trash the weapons then. Dump `em in the Gulf?
63 posted on 10/01/2003 12:59:57 PM PDT by hchutch ("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: arkfreepdom; Pete
"....backburner....."

Nah. Rush is too busy talking about his football comments to be bothered with this kind of stuff.

To Pete: Thanks for posting this otherwise we'd NEVER hear the news.

64 posted on 10/01/2003 12:59:58 PM PDT by DoctorMichael (Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pete
Wow!! This hasn't hit Drudge Yet......
Let's see how long PMSNBC,CNN et al. can avoid this story.
65 posted on 10/01/2003 1:00:06 PM PDT by .cnI redruM (redruM's Advice -- When impersonating an officer, NEVER call for back - up!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
I emailed this story to Fox and ask to verify! Nothing yet.
66 posted on 10/01/2003 1:00:09 PM PDT by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
Perhaps it didn't happen just today. Maybe our chem/bio guys have already called it...?

BINGO. The whole reason the RATs upped the ante on the "leaks" was to flood the news in anticipation of some great news from the middle east. (Iraqi schools open, hospitals up and running, and..oh yeah...WMD's!!)

67 posted on 10/01/2003 1:00:21 PM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
Yeah, but why wouldn't they explain that? I mean, the story should have said "bad guys were trying to get $60 million" or whatever. It's not standard reporting here, so it makes me suspicious. Plus, if this had happened days ago and the press just found out, there should be plenty of details available. If it was happening right now, then it would make sense.
68 posted on 10/01/2003 1:02:18 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Arab Times has nothing. Al-Seyassah is in Arabic, and I don't have arabic fonts installed on this computer (As if that would really make that much of a difference).

The link to both is http://www.al-seyassah.com/
69 posted on 10/01/2003 1:02:21 PM PDT by jae471
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091
Fox is busy with the unemployment rates in Iraq.
70 posted on 10/01/2003 1:02:23 PM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
I'll predict what this turns out to be:

some iraqis claim to have the stuff, they try and sell it based on the claim, and are busted. they have a few empty warheads to "show off", but no material.
71 posted on 10/01/2003 1:03:27 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jae471
Arab Times has nothing. Al-Seyassah is in Arabic, and I don't have arabic fonts installed on this computer (As if that would really make that much of a difference).

That is just where I had gotten to. Al-Seyassah, the source of the story, is indeed in Arabic. I am looking for an online Arabic/English translator. (I used to know where one was).

72 posted on 10/01/2003 1:03:54 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Pete
Jackpot! Bump
73 posted on 10/01/2003 1:04:02 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er ("Don't shoot Mongo, you'll only make him mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete
Can't be. Iraq does not have any WMD (at least according to the democrat party).
74 posted on 10/01/2003 1:04:47 PM PDT by b4its2late (Warning: Dates in Calendar are closer than they appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
That's not funny, man. I'm no ecofreak...but throwing stuff that nasty into the Gulf is pretty vile.

We have a CBW destruction facility on Johnston Island. Let's use it.

75 posted on 10/01/2003 1:05:05 PM PDT by Poohbah ("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
I'm beginning to wonder if it has even that much substance.
76 posted on 10/01/2003 1:05:29 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Let's see how long PMSNBC,CNN et al. can avoid this story.

The big networks will only be interested in the "leak of the CIA agent's name", not any good news like this. If true, there is no doubt who had WMDs.

77 posted on 10/01/2003 1:05:38 PM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (I am ashamed the dixie chicks are from Texas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
I plan to wait and see if this has substance.

Taking it is as, it would totally destroy the DEMS attack upon BUSH. (as long as the media publishes it. If not, it's up to us)
78 posted on 10/01/2003 1:05:56 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

To: Lee'sGhost
So far the news is only a repeating of an Islamic source. No man of reason takes an Islamic's tales as true until closely verified.
80 posted on 10/01/2003 1:07:45 PM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 641-649 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson