Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wolfstar

Technically, her cover was "compromised" by Aldrich Ames. She was brought back and they dealt with her cover being compromised at that time in regards to any overseas operations.

She remained an undercover or covert employee. That status isn't determined by your job or where you are or what you're doing. You just are or aren't, according to what the agency designates you.

That she was compromised by Ames or she ceased doing covert work overseas does not necessarily mean she was no longer an undercover employee. But it's significant because it nullifies the histrionics of those who know better when they go on and on about the danger this put on employees, operations and foreign sources. Having already been compromised by Ames, she would not have been part of any operations that would need to be protected by the statute.

She was still undercover, but that was simply her status as an employee. She could have spent the next 20 years as an undercover employee never doing so much as writing a letter under a pseudonym.


283 posted on 07/16/2005 10:41:46 PM PDT by Wendy44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]


To: Wendy44
She was never confirmed to be 'undercover' by the CIA.
284 posted on 07/17/2005 12:17:25 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson