[Enterprise]

I wouldn't boycott ESPN over the Rush incident. I listen to him regularly, and I tuned in on Sunday morning just because he was on the show. Now that he won't be there, I won't tune in to that particular show.

The ESPN executives are relieved that Rush is gone. But they wear panties, so what else could you expect?

[Arrowhead1952]

The ESPN executives are relieved that Rush is gone. But they wear panties, so what else could you expect?

The executives for ESPN wear "SPEEDOS".

[Wright is right!]

"I tuned in on Sunday morning just because he was on the show. Now that he won't be there, I won't tune in to that particular show."

I, too, tuned in just because he was on the show. But I was disappointed because I really didn't think he added anything significant. Every time he talked, one or more of the guys at the main desk would talk OVER him. He rarely got to talk in the clear.

While I would agree with him that the media HAS hyped McNabb a bit, there are currently some fine QB's in the NFL that are black and need no hyping. And I think that any mention of McNabb's race was unnecessary. It would have been sufficient to simply say that McNabb had been over-rated and let it go at that.

I won't watch the show again, but not because of Rush either being there or not being there. He didn't add anything, and I don't particularly the show anyway. I'd rather just watch the games.

Michael

[glennaro]

I sent an e-card to ESPN this morning to express my condolences on the loss of their executive management's manhood for failing to support the opinion of the media of one of their commentators.

I suggested a slight name change to the Effeminate Sports Programming Network.