Skip to comments.
Talks on Capitol Hill to Regulate Tobacco Industry Break Down
Smoke Club Newsletter ^
| 10-2-03
| By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos.
Posted on 10/03/2003 10:06:10 AM PDT by SheLion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
1
posted on
10/03/2003 10:06:12 AM PDT
by
SheLion
To: SheLion
Puff
2
posted on
10/03/2003 10:07:26 AM PDT
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: All
We Replaced Patrick Leahy's Brains With Folger's Crystals. Let's See If Anyone Notices!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
10/03/2003 10:09:44 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: SheLion
Good!
4
posted on
10/03/2003 10:12:16 AM PDT
by
talleyman
(Caviar emptor (a warning from the sturgeon general): Individual results may vary.)
To: *all
5
posted on
10/03/2003 10:12:25 AM PDT
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: SheLion
Fat Ted is a leading Democrat on the Health Committee? Words fail me!!!!!!
I wonder how he feels about the health of the late Mary Jo Kopechne?
6
posted on
10/03/2003 10:14:54 AM PDT
by
Mears
To: SheLion; *puff_list
So the jist of this is they did the right thing for the wrong reasons.
7
posted on
10/03/2003 10:21:00 AM PDT
by
qam1
(Don't Patikify New Jersey)
To: SheLion
Horray!
8
posted on
10/03/2003 10:50:44 AM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(waiting for the next October surprise)
To: SheLion; Constitution Day; Howlin; azhenfud; mykdsmom
Smaller companies like R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc., say they will be financially ruined by both the buyout and the oversight measures.Oh well, our Senator Giddy doesn't care. What's 2600 more jobs lost here in the last week.
But when Senate Democrats saw Gregg's final proposal, they said that the provision that allowed only Congress to ban cigarettes was so vaguely written it could have prevented the FDA from requiring changes to make cigarettes safer.
I can't believe this is even an issue. To put this power in the hands of some of biggest nanny government officials, Elizabeth Dole included, is practically insane. She signed on to end government subsidies, which severely affected RJR enough for them to cut jobs, knowing that this bill was a possibility? I guess you were right az, we're going to all have jobs standing on the roadside checking seatbelts
NC ping. The effects of electing a CINO to represent us are coming home to roost ping. Go, Giddy, go!!
9
posted on
10/03/2003 10:58:20 AM PDT
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: billbears
"
..we're going to all have jobs standing on the roadside checking seatbelts..."
Yeah,...and being paid $1.50/hr just like our industrial equiv's in China. But government is working to "cover" all those "extras", don't you know...
10
posted on
10/03/2003 11:09:08 AM PDT
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: SheLion
One thing says it all: $
To: billbears
I'm anxiously waiting on RJR to tell Dole, the Sinate, the Feds, and the whole nine yards to kiss old rusty and then refuse to sell one bit of tobacco outside NC esp to those quick-suit states, and if the NC gov won't protect the industry, then move to Pakistan or someplace that will appreciate the revenue their industry produces.
The Feds ought to either ban tobacco altogether or leave it ALONE. I don't smoke, but the attacks on tobacco are getting mighty old already.
Personally, I'd give NC legislators the choice; protect the industry with allowing export/import like I'd suggested before or I'd close the whole thing down and let all their budgets flop. RJR can afford to move its tobacco production to any other country, build a crop and market back to the US cheaper than accomodating the idiot lawyers we call "represenatives" in the Dunce City of Washington.
Washington is infested equally with idiots of both "D"'s and "R"'s.
12
posted on
10/03/2003 11:28:57 AM PDT
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: SheLion; *Wod_list; jmc813
health groups wanted the FDA to be able to ban tobacco productsSmokers, welcome to the War On Some Drugs.
13
posted on
10/06/2003 6:28:31 AM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: MrLeRoy; *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; ...
Smokers, welcome to the War On Some Drugs. DRUGS? I don't THINK so. Tobacco is a legal product and NOT a drug. Drugs are illegal and you need a prescription in order to obtain them. Tobacco and cigarettes can be bought over the counter.
14
posted on
10/06/2003 6:35:13 AM PDT
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: SheLion; MrLeRoy
"DRUGS? I don't THINK so. Tobacco is a legal product and NOT a drug. Drugs are illegal and you need a prescription in order to obtain them. Tobacco and cigarettes can be bought over the counter." I'm a smoker, and I disagree. Tobacco contains nicotine, which is a drug. Alcohol, which is sold over the counter, is a drug. Caffiene, which is in every sip of coffee, tea, or soda we drink, is a drug.
And the "War on tobacco" is just an extension of the "War on drugs". Same methods, same m.o.
15
posted on
10/06/2003 6:43:07 AM PDT
by
Vigilantcitizen
(Game on in ten seconds...http://www.fatcityonline.com/Video/fatcityvsdemented.WMV)
To: SheLion
DRUGS? I don't THINK so. Tobacco is a legal product and NOT a drug. Drugs are illegal and you need a prescription in order to obtain them. Tobacco and cigarettes can be bought over the counter. Tobacco(and alcohol) are drugs, very addictive ones at that. Legality isn't the definition. For example would declaring cannabis legal make it no longer a drug?
Good to see ya back around SheLion.
16
posted on
10/06/2003 6:43:52 AM PDT
by
steve50
(Principles are useless if applied selectively)
To: SheLion
I'd like to, one time in my life, walk to Washington D.C. carrying signs and literature protesting the incredible mass of regulations, rules, and laws that the ordinary American trying to make a living MUST follow.
I'm screaming angry about this. We're buried--buried in a mass of freaking rules that are so complex and mostly contradictory that we can't even live day to day without breaking a number of the freaking laws--it's everywhere! It's all the way from medical care and the massive volumes of paperwork required for the simplest payment for the simplest healing act, the volumes of laws businesses must follow even BEFORE any doors are opened to try to sell something, the OSHA regulations, the EPA regulations, the FDA regulations, the Housing regulations, the TAX regulations--federal, state, county, city--
And now they want to add another steaming mound to something as simple as making, selling, and lighting a cigarette!
WHERE DOES IT END? WHEN DOES THE GOVERNMENT STOP REGULATING AND TAXING EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR EXISTENCE FROM THE VERY AIR YOU BREATHE TO THE WAY YOU ARE BURIED?????
17
posted on
10/06/2003 6:43:53 AM PDT
by
Judith Anne
(Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
To: SheLion; All
Sorry, I forgot the /rant.
18
posted on
10/06/2003 6:45:20 AM PDT
by
Judith Anne
(Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
To: SheLion
*sigh* The freaking government is going to kill us all...tobacco hasn't done a tiny fraction or miniscule percentage of the harm the freaking government has...
19
posted on
10/06/2003 6:47:35 AM PDT
by
Judith Anne
(Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
To: Judith Anne; SheLion
"Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them broken....There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted and you create a nation of law-breakers and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Rearden, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with." -- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, Ch. III, "White Blackmail"
20
posted on
10/06/2003 6:48:14 AM PDT
by
Vigilantcitizen
(Game on in ten seconds...http://www.fatcityonline.com/Video/fatcityvsdemented.WMV)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson