Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Talks on Capitol Hill to Regulate Tobacco Industry Break Down
Smoke Club Newsletter ^ | 10-2-03 | By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos.

Posted on 10/03/2003 10:06:10 AM PDT by SheLion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last
To: MrLeRoy
I support a person's right to use tobacco or any other recreational substance on their own property or any property whose owner has agreed to it

Then why are you against a person being able to use his own property to manufacture LEGAL drugs?

41 posted on 10/06/2003 8:33:22 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
I'd like to see pot legalized, but not heroin or meth, and I would vote in referrendums accordingly if need be.

Really? Then why are you aligned with MrLeroy?

42 posted on 10/06/2003 8:35:57 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA; MrLeRoy
Really? Then why are you aligned with MrLeroy?

Explain "aligned". Leroy's a good guy and makes intelligent arguments, but we certainly have our share of disagreements. Would you consider yourself "aligned" with the gun grabbing Robert Wood Johnson Foundation since you agree with them on the drug war?

43 posted on 10/06/2003 8:38:41 AM PDT by jmc813 (Arnold needs to drop out now for the good of the party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
why are you against a person being able to use his own property to manufacture LEGAL drugs?

As I believe I've explained to you many times---perhaps as often as jmc813 has explained his position: In my opinion, local zoning regulations reflect the restrictions that in a free society would be enacted through voluntary mechanisms (such as easements and covenants).

44 posted on 10/06/2003 8:38:51 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
we certainly have our share of disagreements.

Although I suspect we now agree that the Jets suck.

45 posted on 10/06/2003 8:40:04 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Why don't you tell her your thoughts on legalizing hard drugs?

While we're at it why don't you give us your position on affluent conservative talk show host junkies?

46 posted on 10/06/2003 8:41:57 AM PDT by steve50 (Principles are useless if applied selectively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Although I suspect we now agree that the Jets suck.

Bah. I agree, but keep in mind that if they win this week, they will have the same record they did after 5 games last year, and we all know how that ended up.

47 posted on 10/06/2003 8:45:42 AM PDT by jmc813 (Arnold needs to drop out now for the good of the party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
In my opinion, local zoning regulations reflect the restrictions that in a free society would be enacted through voluntary mechanisms

Then you believe that a free society can enact smoking bans. hmmmm

48 posted on 10/06/2003 8:46:01 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Explain "aligned". Leroy's a good guy and makes intelligent arguments, but we certainly have our share of disagreements.

Leroy's goal is legalized hard drugs.

49 posted on 10/06/2003 8:48:56 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Explain "aligned".

Jumping on me when I am discussing MrLeroy's goal of legalizing hard drugs.

50 posted on 10/06/2003 8:50:43 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Max McGarrity; Gabz
Good heavens! Now we can't even discuss, on a conservative forum, anything about tobacco regulation without you guys getting into a freaking hair-splitting nitpicking argument about who said what on the WOD!

I for one wish you would take the illegal drug argument elsewhere.
51 posted on 10/06/2003 8:53:26 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Max McGarrity; Gabz
Of course, I aimed that last post in the wrong direction, I was talking about the other guys--not y'all. Sorry.
52 posted on 10/06/2003 8:54:57 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
In my opinion, local zoning regulations reflect the restrictions that in a free society would be enacted through voluntary mechanisms

Then you believe that a free society can enact smoking bans.

No, I do not believe that even a local group of property owners would mutually contract to disallow smoking on their property. Why would they?

53 posted on 10/06/2003 8:55:55 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Leroy's goal is legalized hard drugs.

And the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's goal is preventing reform of the drug war. Are you aligned with them?

54 posted on 10/06/2003 8:56:29 AM PDT by jmc813 (Arnold needs to drop out now for the good of the party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Can't you find an illegal drug thread somewhere else and get on it? I'd like to read about and discuss tobacco regulation.
55 posted on 10/06/2003 8:57:50 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
No, I do not believe that even a local group of property owners would mutually contract to disallow smoking on their property.

They have, many times. It's called a no-smoking ordinance.

56 posted on 10/06/2003 8:58:43 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
I for one wish you would take the illegal drug argument elsewhere.

If you look into it, you'd be surprised at the parallels between the WOD and the War on Tobacco, as well as the War on the Right to keep and bear arms. Studying the drug war might help you prepare better for your particular battle in the tobbacco spectrum by knowing what tactics your opponents are likely to make in the future.

57 posted on 10/06/2003 8:58:57 AM PDT by jmc813 (Arnold needs to drop out now for the good of the party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
I for one wish you would take the illegal drug argument elsewhere.

It's the same argument---only tobacco is not illegal YET. (As for cinFLA's pointless whining, believe me, NOBODY wants that around.)

58 posted on 10/06/2003 8:59:03 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
I do not believe that even a local group of property owners would mutually contract to disallow smoking on their property.

They have, many times. It's called a no-smoking ordinance.

That's not a mutual contract but tyranny of a majority.

59 posted on 10/06/2003 9:00:21 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
If you look into it, you'd be surprised at the parallels between the WOD and the War on Tobacco, as well as the War on the Right to keep and bear arms. Studying the drug war might help you prepare better for your particular battle in the tobbacco spectrum by knowing what tactics your opponents are likely to make in the future.

Seems you are against the states WOD's! Are you really for legalizing hard drugs??????

60 posted on 10/06/2003 9:00:31 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson