Skip to comments.
Clark Wants Probe of White House on Iraq Intelligence
Reuters ^
| October 3, 2003
Posted on 10/03/2003 3:31:37 PM PDT by Shermy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
10/03/2003 3:31:37 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: HAL9000; Mo1; seamole; Peach; Destro
More "imminent threat" yakking point insertion here.
2
posted on
10/03/2003 3:32:25 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: All
| A Recall AND a Fundraiser? I'm toast. |
 |
| Let's get this over with FAST. Please contribute! |
3
posted on
10/03/2003 3:34:14 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Shermy
The only "intelligence gap" going on here is between Clark's ears.
4
posted on
10/03/2003 3:34:41 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Shermy
We told you Clark was dangerous.
5
posted on
10/03/2003 3:34:42 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Shermy
Ashley must have recieved her DNC play book.
Mary Help!
6
posted on
10/03/2003 3:35:09 PM PDT
by
Spruce
To: dogbyte12
"Saddam was involved in Sept. 11, they implied, "They implied" seems to be a new DNC twist. Course what I remember was the going out of the way to say Iraq wasn't involved in 9/11.
7
posted on
10/03/2003 3:35:56 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: Shermy
Can the white house get a probe of Clark's intelligence?
8
posted on
10/03/2003 3:37:00 PM PDT
by
Rays_Dad
To: Destro
We told you Clark was dangerous. You don't have to tell me! I sensed it from the beginning he's a bad guy. He's shameless, and will say anything for his backers.
Right now he's being ordered to steal Dean's points. Verging on a demogogue.
9
posted on
10/03/2003 3:39:31 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: Shermy
"Nothing could be a more serious violation of public trust than to consciously make a war based on false claims," Hmm, Wes - perhaps then you should also call for an investigation of the false claim made by members of the Clinton Administration about a possible ongoing genocide in Kosovo - you know, the one that justified the war that you waged from 15,000 feet against the civilian population of Serbia.
10
posted on
10/03/2003 3:40:04 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(CongressmanBillyBob/John Armor for Congress - you can't separate them, so send 'em both to D.C.)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: Shermy
Clark, who retired from the military three years ago, said he had seen "no compelling" evidence that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat Now Wes is repeating that imminent lie.
12
posted on
10/03/2003 3:40:48 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(CongressmanBillyBob/John Armor for Congress - you can't separate them, so send 'em both to D.C.)
To: Shermy
The only thing "twisted" is Clark's shorts. He's got 'em all bunched in a knot over pure unadulterted horse manure. The dolt was a military big-shot in the 1990's, with access to all the intelligence on Iraq, so how come HE didn't tell us "the truth" about the WMD when he had the chance? This guy is a real puke, plain and simple.
13
posted on
10/03/2003 3:40:59 PM PDT
by
Wolfstar
(NO SECURITY = NO ECONOMY)
To: Peach
Peach wrote:
The only "intelligence gap" going on here is between Clark's ears.
*********************************
LOL!
You beat me to it!
Clark's a creep.
Tia
14
posted on
10/03/2003 3:42:13 PM PDT
by
tiamat
("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
To: Shermy
Is he talking about the Clinton White House or the Bush White House since both came to the same conclusions about Saddam, the WMD's, and his eventual use of them.
15
posted on
10/03/2003 3:42:14 PM PDT
by
mass55th
To: Rays_Dad
Can the white house get a probe of Clark's intelligence? He's probably a bit dumber than Soros/Clinton/McAuliffe hoped. But as long as he sticks to the big lie tactics he can get traction.
On a positive note, his backers were probably not concerned enough to dig into Clark's past. Acxiom. Kosovo. Messer Griesheim.
FYI, I think buddies Sweeney and Soros are positioning forces to engineer an AFL-CIO endorsement for Clark.
16
posted on
10/03/2003 3:43:25 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: Shermy
Clark Wants Probe of White House on Iraq Intelligence People in hell want ice water. Ain't happening.
To: Shermy
So General Clark, whatever happened to all of those alleged "mass graves of 100's of thousands" that Clinton and Chirac claimed were the reason for your war on Serbia in 1999?
Shouldn't we investigate the White House intelligence on that war, too?!
18
posted on
10/03/2003 3:46:49 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Shermy
The White House should ask for an investigation into Democrats' "intelligence."
19
posted on
10/03/2003 3:49:24 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: Rays_Dad
Can the white house get a probe of Clark's intelligence?
No. Clark is holding John Titor prisoner back in 1995.
Wes Clark has said that he wants to put government research money into time travel. Our military needs this technology.
Titor was the time traveler who was here in this timeline for a few months in 2000 & 2001.
All of this was on Art Bell. I do believe Wes Clark was mentioned. Anyway, pictures and schematics of the machine and the vehicle Titor arrived in are here.
http://www.johntitor.com/
Dems got themselves a real winner here!
ROTFLMAO!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson