Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Andy from Beaverton
Good find, excellent article.

Sounds like a MacArthur wannabe.

The difference is that MacArthur was a pretty good General Officer and Clark is a disaster -- a man who advanced to high rank over the bodies of better men and women than he.

The world is full of people like that, and it is up to us to "out" them for the vermin they are.

Glad you posted this article.
5 posted on 10/04/2003 6:23:12 PM PDT by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Taxman
Clark is the incarnation of SNAFU.
17 posted on 10/04/2003 7:21:50 PM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Taxman
MacArthur and Clark are of the same mental group. MacArthur had lots of people under him that hated his management and leadership ability. He was not the brightest general of the time.

As for Clark...put him into a scenario where he is president of the US, and in a high pressure situation...like the WTC bombing. He would have put the nuclear structure on high alert, and scared the Russians. He would have declared war on the Muslim religion instead of targeting only Ossama and the Taiban boys. Clark is a risky man to have in this position. But I see the democrats pushing his name and getting up as the persident or VP candidate.
22 posted on 10/04/2003 9:30:56 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson