Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military's Sodomy Ban Challenged
Family News In Focus ^ | October 6, 2003 | Stuart Shepard

Posted on 10/06/2003 2:56:35 PM PDT by Ex-Dem

October 6, 2003

Military's Sodomy Ban Challenged
by Stuart Shepard, correspondent

The ACLU hopes to use recent Supreme Court decision to overturn homosexual airman's conviction.

The first legal challenge to the military's sodomy ban since the U.S. Supreme Court voided state laws outlawing sodomy is scheduled to be heard Tuesday.

The case, brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, involves an airman already convicted under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The appeal will be heard by the military's equivalent of the Supreme Court.

"This is an important case, because it is the first opportunity that we have had to test the Supreme Court's Lawrence v. Texas decision within the military court system," said Steve Ralls, a spokesman for the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network.

He argued that the decision in the Lawrence case, which struck down state laws against homosexual sex, means military laws must be struck down as well.

"It would essentially put military law in compliance with civilian law," Ralls said.

But Jordan Lorence, a vice president at the Alliance Defense Fund, a pro-family legal society, said the military must be free to set its own rules regarding homosexual conduct, regardless of what laws bind the states, because of the inherent lack of privacy and the demands of combat in the military.

"Even if it's consensual, if it's between members of the military as it was in this case inevitably, (homosexuality) is going to cause disruption because the individual soldiers are going to be concerned: 'Who's staring at me? Who's sexually attracted to me?' " he said.

Lorence added that the Lawrence decision in which justices found that the Constitution's so-called right to privacy extends to homosexual sodomy is now being cited in all sorts of cases, even the defense of polygamy.

"The big question is: How far is the reach of Lawrence v. Texas?" Lorence said. "Does it basically legalize everything?"

FOR MORE INFORMATION
We recommend the following book: "The Homosexual Agenda: Exposing the Principal Threat to Religious Freedom Today," by Alan Sears and Craig Osten.<


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aclu; adf; dontaskdonttell; homosexualagenda; lawrencevtexas; military; militaryreadiness; scotus; sodomy; ucmj
It's one thing in the civilian population, but in the military, I don't see how sexually deviant behavior can do anything other than harm unit cohesion...
1 posted on 10/06/2003 2:56:36 PM PDT by Ex-Dem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
We're On A Mission From God
Help us make our 4th quarter fundraising goal in record time!

2 posted on 10/06/2003 2:57:53 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem
Actually, now that I think about it, it could probably do worse than just harm unit cohesion...

Also, has anyone read any of the books mentioned in the link at the bottom?
3 posted on 10/06/2003 3:05:15 PM PDT by Ex-Dem (Better a traitor to the DNC than a traitor to America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem
It shouldn't be necessary to explain to the ACLU that certain laws exist under military law which don't apply with respect to civilian law. If I didn't show up at my job tomorrow, my boss could fire me, but he couldn't bring me up on AWOL charges or desertion.
4 posted on 10/06/2003 3:09:59 PM PDT by Coeur de Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem
The military has its own constraints and its own procedures. Since its raison d'etre is different than civilian pursuits, its management must be different as well.

Homosexuality is a divisive force wherever it is practiced. In the civilian population, a certain amount of that is acceptable. It is most assuredly NOT acceptable in military units. Hopefully this tribunal has the vision to perceive that, and the courage to act accordingly.

5 posted on 10/06/2003 3:11:30 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem
"Actually..it could probably do worse than harm unit cohesion..."
The way it was explained to me was that the Army is it's own bloodbank.
In basic training we all "volunteered" to give blood.
Nobody needs to have those doubts in their mind.
6 posted on 10/06/2003 3:23:05 PM PDT by Redcoat LI ("If you're going to shoot,shoot,don't talk" Tuco BenedictoPacifico Juan Maria Ramirez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coeur de Lion
It shouldn't be necessary to explain to the ACLU that certain laws exist under military law which don't apply with respect to civilian law.

That's agood point. Unfortunately, those that hold to the ACLU's worldview probably want to see the military culture destroyed.

7 posted on 10/06/2003 3:25:59 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI
That's a great point that I hadn't thought of (the risk of spreading STDs).
8 posted on 10/06/2003 3:31:11 PM PDT by Ex-Dem (Better a traitor to the DNC than a traitor to America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen; Coeur de Lion
That's agood point. Unfortunately, those that hold to the ACLU's worldview probably want to see the military culture destroyed.
9 posted on 10/06/2003 4:02:32 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson