[AFPhys]

Assuming that's the case, then the "Yes" and "No" advocates have the same risk of overlooking Q1, and neither side of that issue has an inherent advantage or disadvantage based on such oversight.

Hmm... I think I disagree with your statement that neither side has an inherent advantage. The Grayout fans are there for one reason: to vote NO on #1. They will vote Busta or some other freak as an afterthought, but they are going to search for and find the #1 question.

On the other hand, those debating here whether to vote for Arnie or Tom are most interested in that line, not the #1 question.

As I see it, there is a definite advantage to the true blue demodogs, and a real risk for this to be an important factor.

[Cboldt]

The situation is even worse IF a non-punch is equivalent to a NO. IN that case, the NO point of view would have an inherent advantage.