Posted on 10/31/2003, 5:38:48 PM by NYer
EDITORIAL:
One Catholic argues that liturgical dance is precisely what Pope John Paul II likes to see during Mass. Another Catholic criticizes priests for liturgical experimentation.
Sound like a spirited after-Mass conversation at your parish last Sunday? Actually, the combatants in this case are two Vatican officials.
Forty years after the Second Vatican Council called for liturgical renewal, the debate continues over what's acceptable change and what isn't. Consider the positions recently articulated by the two officials.
Many Catholics consider liturgical dance to lie beyond the avant-garde, but it was defended by Pope John Paul II's chief liturgist, Archbishop Piero Marini. Some of his peers object to dancers appearing at events like Mother Teresa's beatification last Sunday. Archbishop Marini responded that dancing is in line with what the pope wants in liturgies because it captures the feel of the Church's universality.
At almost the same time, Cardinal Francis Arinze, prefect of the Vatican Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments, lambasted "the over-fertile imagination of an enthusiastic priest who concocts something on Saturday night and inflicts it on the innocent Sunday morning congregation."
He made his comments at the recent national convention of the Federation of Diocesan Liturgical Commissions, held in Texas. He lauded much of the renewal of the liturgy, but he is no fan of church renovation. "If a church is built and the seats are arranged as in an amphitheater or as in a banquet, the undeclared emphasis may be horizontal attention to one another, rather than vertical attention to God," he said. "We come to Mass primarily to adore God, not to affirm one another, although this is not excluded."
Attitudes at the Vatican can often seem contradictory:
* While the cardinal praised "the sustained effort to translate the various liturgical texts into the current language of the people," he still longs for Latin to be preserved; and
* While Archbishop Marini eagerly inserts dancing into papal Masses, other Vatican functionaries were recently trying to add anti-dance regulations to a new document on the liturgy, only to be thwarted by other officials.
The next time you hear two Catholics quarreling after Mass about where the tabernacle should be or if altar girls are acceptable, remember that even Vatican executives are divided over matters that have not been settled four decades after the liturgical renewal began.
Did anyone watch the beatification mass? The young girls pictured above, brought up small bowls of oil. That part was tastefully done. However, in the middle of the offertory, a group of women "danced", lifting bowls of flowers - the whole thing set to Indian music. IMHO, that was out of place, inappropriate, tasteless and completely unnecessary.
Apparently, the Pope likes the dancing. There were dancers at his Mass in Mexico City this year.
On the contrary, NYer with all due respect, I thought it was very tastefully done, and completely appropriate for the occasion.
I'd bet Mother Teresa would think so too.
I thought so as well. A Mass is "the Mass, period" - save the Indian music and dancing for afterwards.
What bothered me most was that they actually stopped the mass, switched on the canned Indian music, and had these women swirl around lifting bowls of flowers up and down. It did NOT belong in the middle of the Offertory.
The Indigenous native dancers at the Mexico mass, lead the procession into the church. They did not dance during the offertory!
Juan Diego was an indigenuous indian; hence the dancers make sense. Mother Teresa was an Albanian who served God in India. One set of young dancers appeared in the procession. That should have been sufficient.
Marini served his apprenticeship as personal secretary to Annibale Bugnini, the notorious post- Vatican II liturgical wrecker.
And there you have it!! I strongly doubt that JPII was given ALL the details relevant to the beatification mass. Like Colleen, many of the "shee shee" nonsense that accompanied her mass stood out in total contrast to what she practiced. If anything, I half imagined her wagging a scolding finger at Bugnini for that "disgraceful show in front of the pontiff".
Here is Bishop Marini "on the liturgy":
"“In the old liturgy, in use before the Second Vatican Council, the role of the master of ceremonies consisted in applying a series of rigid norms which could not be changed. Today one cannot organize a celebration without first having thought: who is celebrating, what is being celebrated, where is it being celebrated…. The celebration is the point toward which converge diverse and reciprocally coordinated elements under the guide of that spirit of adaptation that is the soul of post-conciliar reform. Thus it’s a matter of foreseeing and planning the celebration with a view toward the result one wants to obtain. For example, one can’t think of a liturgical action without taking account of the space in which it will take place, the hymns that will be performed… Everything that is thought out and predisposed in view of a celebration can be considered real and proper direction. One finds oneself acting, in a certain way, upon a stage. Liturgy is also a show.”
And here is Francis Cardinal Arinze,:
"People want fidelity at Mass, not novelty, Cardinal Francis Arinze, the Vatican's top liturgy official, said at an international liturgy forum in Washington May 16. "What most of the people who come to Mass are asking for is simply that the Mass is there, according to the approved books. The primary thing they are asking for is not something new," he said. Cardinal Arinze, prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments, stressed that liturgical renewal in the church calls for "ongoing formation for all of us." He also underlined "the importance of good sacred music" for liturgy, adding, "Nobody can doubt that, because it helps us to worship God, and also it helps us to maintain a sense of the sacred." The Nigerian-born cardinal spoke briefly at the end of a three-hour forum on liturgical renewal in the United States. Sponsored by the Secretariat for Liturgy of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, it marked the 40th anniversary of the Second Vatican Council's 1963 Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy."
Anyone care to weigh in on this issue? Marini vs Arinze
Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list
Cardinal Arinze. It's like he's talking to me.
Marini wins.
Cues are taken from Papal Masses, which is why the African bishops are upset that there seems to be an attempt to reign in local customs at their Masses.
This is not new; dancing has been common at "international Masses" (i.e., canonizations of saints) for YEARS. Marini has been Papal MC since 1987.
Once would think that, if the Pope were not happy with his liturgical planning, he would have said something in the last sixteen years!
There's that thorny and raging debate over "Collegiality" (the idea that bishops and their conferences should be able to make decisions about areas of church life they know best) and it appears that this Pope is not one to elevate himself over his brother bishops - after all, they also are guided by the Holy Spirit.
Pope's chief liturgist defends use of dance in papal Masses
VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Pope John Paul II's chief liturgist, Archbishop Piero Marini, has defended the use of dance in papal Masses abroad and at the Vatican. Archbishop Marini said liturgical celebrations presided over by the pope have a "universal" character that should accommodate the legitimate cultural elements of Catholic communities around the world. He made the comments in an interview with the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera Oct. 15. Some church officials have criticized Archbishop Marini because they think the papal liturgies in recent years have been too outlandish. Reflecting strong sentiment in some Vatican quarters, a draft version of a recent Vatican document on liturgical norms recommended no dance inside churches -- even outside celebration of the Mass. In contrast, an Oct. 5 beatification Mass in St. Peter's Square featured African dance at the offertory and Indian dance at the consecration. Archbishop Marini, who has designed papal liturgies for 17 years, said the criticism was off the mark. "To introduce dance at a parish Mass in Italy would be pointless. But the celebration (on Oct. 5) was a missionary celebration, for the beatification of three people who evangelized Africa and Asia," Archbishop Marini said.
That is seriously contrary to the traditional understanding of the Mass. Even the NCReporter acknowledges "To take one example, Medina frowns on liturgical dance, but papal Masses organized by Marini are notorious for Broadway-style routines."
"But the celebration (on Oct. 5) was a missionary celebration, for the beatification of three people who evangelized Africa and Asia," Archbishop Marini said."
So did those people who evangelized Africa and Asia come to incorporate the belief system and practices of the natives they were evangelizing, or did they come to bring them the Mass and the Eucharist and the Gospel?
If in the future dance is incorporated in the Mass and becomes tradition, what would happen if one was evangelizing a country that looked at dance as worship as an abomination? Like maybe in an Orthodox or Muslim country? And how do our Orthodox brothers and sisters view this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.