Skip to comments.
Catholic Bishops Eye Possible Crackdown of Pro-Abortion Pols
CrossWalk ^
| 11/11/2003
| David Thibault - CNS News
Posted on 11/11/2003 9:29:19 PM PST by yonif
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
1
posted on
11/11/2003 9:29:20 PM PST
by
yonif
To: yonif
They are beginning to realize that the Catholics who matter are those who do more than check "Catholic" on forms?
2
posted on
11/11/2003 9:39:45 PM PST
by
RobbyS
(XP)
To: RobbyS
Please God, they're beginning to discover that being "a sign of contradiction" can be liberating.
3
posted on
11/11/2003 9:54:30 PM PST
by
Romulus
(Nothing really good ever happened after 1789.)
To: yonif
Hopefully they can be nudged even more.
4
posted on
11/11/2003 9:59:14 PM PST
by
tiki
To: yonif
"Catholic Bishops Eye Possible Crackdown of Pro-Abortion Pols"
Then, little hearts all a flutter and panties in a wad, they hike up their skirts and stampede shrieking for the nearest bathhouse to put such horrifying thoughts behind them.
5
posted on
11/11/2003 11:16:57 PM PST
by
dsc
To: yonif; .45MAN; AAABEST; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; Antoninus; ...
|
|
|
Catholic Politician Abortion Voting Records 1995 -2003 |
Catholic U.S. Senator Abortion Voting Records 1995 -2003
4/17/03 : Govs. being updated. If you have voting records or other pertinent documentation please forward to us.
|
|
6
posted on
11/11/2003 11:43:15 PM PST
by
ckca
To: yonif
This has potential or might backfire in NY against Schumer. We'll see with his opposition.
7
posted on
11/12/2003 12:08:46 AM PST
by
neverdem
(Say a prayer for New York both for it's lefty statism and the probability the city will be hit again)
To: ckca
Thanks forthe ping will pass this info on..
8
posted on
11/12/2003 12:54:50 AM PST
by
.45MAN
(We are americans bound together by history and love of freedom. We will not forget them!)
To: yonif
I would love to see this to fruition. I think the Church's latest "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore" conservative push is very refreshing, and good for business to boot.
9
posted on
11/12/2003 3:38:31 AM PST
by
AAABEST
To: yonif
Excommunicating public officials is a bad idea that will eventually backfire. More than 40 years ago JFK had to campaign hard to overcome the public fear that a Catholic president would be taking orders from the Pope - at the time, the Catholic establishment in the US kept mum or actually corroborated JFK's statements that bishops wouldn't be bossing him around.
But now the Catholic establishment wants the opposite, presumably just with regard to abortion, but maybe the next step is to excommunicate public officials if they don't support public funds for parochial schools, or some other important issue (I am old enough to remember a time when doctors were legally forbidden to discuss even ordinary birth control with their patients). And they make this proposal publicly. And non-Catholics will have justification to pause at the voting booth and ask themselves if they dare to vote for a Catholic candidate who is being openly bullied to follow his Church's agenda instead of the interests and desires of the taxpayers who voted for him and pay his salary.
10
posted on
11/12/2003 4:24:47 AM PST
by
DonQ
To: DonQ
Great Weasel post! Don't be a moral Catholic because the 'taxpayers' don't want you to be. Oh, but go ahead and keep calling yourself Catholic.
Either you are a Catholic or you are not. You cannot accept part of the dogmas and not others.
11
posted on
11/12/2003 4:34:14 AM PST
by
Smocker
To: DonQ; dubyaismypresident; xsmommy
So you're suggesting they should put their job before their religion and spiritual base? Why worry about eternal damnation when you want a good pension plan?
To: RobbyS
I predict they won't do anything that doesn't put pro-death penalty politicians on the same platform as the pro-aborts. I'm sorry to say so, but these bishops are so far removed from our faith and don't want to do anything that would jeopardize their standing with the liberal elites.
To: yonif
Dallas, Texas, Bishop Joseph Galante was selected to head the panel.A wise choice!
It's about time they heard our pleas. I'm looking forward to the outcome of this committee.
14
posted on
11/12/2003 5:39:45 AM PST
by
al_c
To: tiki
Politicians who have sold their souls to get elected will not be moved by an excommunication. That will be for them a badge of political courage.
IMO, all this is superfluous. These annual meetings tend to distract all of us - Bishops and laity - from the rudimentary truth; Bishops have the Duty to Teach, Rule, and Sanctify. There is no need for a Bishop to be told by a Committee he ought do his job.
The Bishop could call the pols in his Diocese onto the carpet and he could have a face-to-face with these soulless cretins and first determine if they know what the Living Magisterium Teaches and the Bishop can correct any Doctrinal defecienices before warning the pols their souls are endangered if they do not repent and reform and the Bishop can tell the pols he will explain to his flock that Christians cannot in good conscience vote for any politician who votes to support abortion.
This really isn't complicated.
15
posted on
11/12/2003 5:58:28 AM PST
by
Catholicguy
(MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
To: Catholicguy
"This really isn't complicated."
In theory, no it is not. In practice, it will be made to be. Remember, the bishops, like most higher ups in all denominations, are at least part way political creatures. If they take a hard line on the Pro aborts, they can expect some backlash from the same politicians. Didn't a Msgr tell Former Govenor Davis he wasn't welcome because he was a pro abort? I remember that Davis and many of the "Hollywood elites" blasted the Msgr as intruding on the "persoanl rights" of poor old Davis.
My own denomination doesn't have this problem, because so far the LCMS has refused to do anything political. This is unfortunate and not the best Still, it is a problem. A few months ago, my pastor had an excellent sermon on the evil of abortion. As a result, some families have left the church. I think that is ok (if they don't believe it, why fake it?) but it has hit the budget. Maybe the bishops are in the same boat. They don't want to bit the pols to hard and cut off potential donations?
16
posted on
11/12/2003 6:15:42 AM PST
by
redgolum
(I should know better than to post on Calvin threads......)
To: Catholicguy
This would deter some poll who have had less than a 55% majority in his district and a substantial Catholic population. But it really needs an effective lay organization in that district to dog the poll during his campaign. Let the bishop speak out and have no public relation with the pol, more or less like ole Tom was treated by the Pennsylvania bishop and then stay out of the way while lay leaders organize what amount to a pro-life opposition. The best way is to get a candidate on the ballot if the Pubblie candidate is not strong enough on the issue. This has worked before.
17
posted on
11/12/2003 7:24:03 AM PST
by
RobbyS
(XP)
To: redgolum
I really don't know what prevents the Bishops from doing their duty. I just wish they did do their duty and let the chips fall were they may.
18
posted on
11/12/2003 8:37:20 AM PST
by
Catholicguy
(MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
To: RobbyS
That's a good point. The Bishops should do their duty and we should do ours. As you pointed out it can work and even if it failed it would work. Teaching Moral Truths always works. Any temporary negative results would be overcome in the long run. Truth is always rewarded.
19
posted on
11/12/2003 8:40:20 AM PST
by
Catholicguy
(MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
To: yonif
I was wondering when this would hit the media. Took one whole day. LOL!
20
posted on
11/12/2003 8:48:48 AM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson