[PetroniusMaximus]

Jesus is, on occasion, refered to as the "Angel of the Lord" in the OT.

Now no angel will claim,

"I am the First and the Last,
And alive, and was dead, and behold I am living for ever and ever"

This is the glorified, risen, Christ.The one who "rose from the dead".

***This was a vision well after the crucifiction, not Jesus in His Living Ministry on earth.***

You can't change the argument midstream my friend.

[narses]

How does that deny that Our Lord taught many things NOT written? How does the Sola Scriptura crowd deal with the fact that the entire canon wasn't complete during the first century?

[Siobhan]

Jesus is, on occasion, refered to as the "Angel of the Lord" in the OT.

How can you make this claim from the Bible alone. Or is your argument that the Bible is not enough for interpreting the Bible itself? I am confused by your posts and I suspect you have an interpretative method, but it is not readily apparent to me. Clarification would be welcome. How do come to your conclusion that Jesus is, on occasion, refered to as the "Angel of the Lord" in the OT?