To: dangus
If you have any other citations of a council condemn a Pope as proclaiming heresies, please do share.Nope, I sure don't. But the Church has had no shortage of naughty Patriarchs, the See of Rome being no exception. Given that, we're disinclined to recognize any one bishop, Pope or otherwise, as being infallible, even when speaking ex cathedra. Call us paranoid if you like. ;)
46 posted on
04/30/2004 12:09:18 PM PDT by
monkfan
(Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
To: monkfan
So you made an assertion that the councils had found Popes to be heretics, even though you accede that the assertion is false, and then say you *assume* Popes are fallible, just because they are "peccable"? (Yes, I probably made that word up!)
>>Given that, we're disinclined to recognize any one bishop, Pope or otherwise, as being infallible, even when speaking ex cathedra. Call us paranoid if you like. ;)<<
I'd rather say, "distrusting" than paranoid. Distrusting of who? The Pope? I'll readily concede that Popes are neither impeccable or inerrant. It's the *Holy* *Spirit* and not the Pope who confers infallibility apon the Pope. We careful who it is you distrust!
54 posted on
04/30/2004 1:18:35 PM PDT by
dangus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson