Posted on 05/15/2004 1:34:23 PM PDT by baldie
One dares not imagine how the volunteers will be asked to check credentials.
"One dares not imagine how the volunteers will be asked to check credentials."
Nor imagine how the delegate nomination process looks like.
Homosexual Agenda Ping - Wow, it's the weekend and the items are pouring in anyway. Well, who is it making "gay" **** an issue? Us or them?
More on Dem'o'cr*p affirmative action for "gays". Will the fun ever stop? It's amazing to see mass psychosis in progress. I used to wonder how Hitler could have ever come to power, how he could have tricked/fooled/influenced or forced people to succumb to his evil. Now I know - we're seeing something similar happening. Only even faster because of mass communication technology.
To see the beackground of Nazism and its very close relationship with the origin of the "gay rights" movement, please read "The Pink Swastika" by Scott Lively and Kevin Abrams - available at Amazon or http://www.abidingtruth.com/
You'll be glad you did.
Pingify me if anyone wants on/off this (busy and about to get busier) pinglist.
What's worse are the people who are turning a blind eye.
By not taking a stand people are still taking a stand. It's kind of the default position, and it's not a good one.
Rush Limbaugh and Zell Miller are right...the extreme left have taken over the Demonrat party.
Next, polygamists, pedophiles, and veritable Whitman's sampler of perversions.
Diversity = perversity.
It's the position of the left in this country. They would rather stand by their ideologies...no matter how strange, rather than to stand for absolute truth.
The neoliberals are the strangest creatures on earth. It's like some mental disease. They have no core values so they are paralyzed to act on anything in anyway.
"One dares not imagine how the volunteers will be asked to check credentials."
They might ask those special delegates to wear pink triangles.
The word that describes them very accurately in Sanskrit is "godas" - (that's a singular word) - servant of the senses. Their sensual desires, and the mind which follows behind, are their master. The genitals (or whichever sense, but those are the strongest besides the tongue) says "I WANT IT ALL AND I WANT IT NOW!!!" and the enslaved hedonist says, "Yessir, yessir, three bags full! Right away, master, whatever you say, master."
They don't realize that the fantasy of happiness and satisfaction promised by the mind and the attendant sensual desires is a false promise, like an ugly disease ridden whore promising true faithful love.
Seeing as how the shrinks may take pedophilia out of the DSM-IV (as they did with homosexuality some time ago), the Dem convention in 2008 could have quotas for them too.
The democrats encourage people to make their sexual proclivity their defining public identity. What a disgrace! Sexual activity is a private matter, and people have a right to have different moral views on the acceptability of homosexual behavior.
The democrats' quota also appears to be based on the discredited Kinsey report 10% figure. Most experts now think that Kinsey overestimated the percentage of those with homosexual proclivities. In addition, those that will fill the quota only applies to those who make their sex drive their primary public identity, and do not represent those who may struggle in private, who may be more conservative or traditional religious believers.
The democrats want to make sure the boos for the Boy Scouts will be heard on the elite media.
If there's a quota, then someone has to have some specific word on it. Is there any documentation of this assertion, or any direct testimony for it? Or is the above just rumor that sounds like something some people would like to believe?
" It's like some mental disease."
Well, that's what G.K. Chesterton said at the beginning of the 20th century.
"They don't realize that the fantasy of happiness and satisfaction promised by the mind and the attendant sensual desires is a false promise, like an ugly disease ridden whore promising true faithful love."
Trying to find happiness in that way is like trying to keep a room illuminated all night by lighting successive matches.
Was it Chesterton or Lewis who said that?
The lips of a loose woman drip honey, and her speech is smoother than oil. But in the end she is bitter as wormwood, sharp as a two-edged sword.
That was God who said that.
What's a good Chesterton book to read? I've only read quotes and excerpts here and there. I'm a very busy person and the library around here is very bad, so if you have any titles you can reccommend, I'd appreciate it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.