Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gibson film based more on mysticism than gospels
ekklesia.co.uk ^ | 9/7/04 | ekklesia.co.uk

Posted on 07/09/2004 9:11:03 PM PDT by Destro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Destro

"This is the conclusion of a contributor to a new book to be published in August, who also suggests that only around 5% of the film is based on the gospel accounts of Jesus' death. "


5 percent? John Dominic Crossan has alwasys been a bit loony and is getting more senile every day. Anyone who can read can see the Passion of Chirst followed the bulk of the Gospel narrative's passion account despite any similarities to other versions (or visions). Of course, there were points that diverged, whether from old non-Gospel sources or simply artistic license. Gibson did not slavishly adhere to the Gospels. This has been true of every film. You can't make a movie strictly from the Gospels. You have to fill in some blanks. Claiming only 5 percent is absurd, though. This really sounds like just an excuse for yet another book promoting his own revisionist visions.


21 posted on 07/10/2004 8:31:13 AM PDT by nosofar ("I'm not above the Law. I am the Law!" - Judge Dredd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; Pio; Destro; Polycarp IV; Desdemona
Interesting bunch.

As Polycarp IV said, " 'nuff said."

22 posted on 07/10/2004 9:52:06 AM PDT by kstewskis (BUSH-GIBSON 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Destro
John Dominic Crossan

More tripe from the heretic Crossan.


23 posted on 07/10/2004 10:07:01 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro

I'd was hoping that they were through with attacking this film, but no they found something else. Hopefully no one will care what these loonies think and they will continue being ignored.


24 posted on 07/10/2004 10:22:15 AM PDT by massiveblob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Neither did Thomas Jefferson resurrection - nor did Jefferson believe in the virgin birth or the divinity of Christ.
25 posted on 07/10/2004 10:35:23 AM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Neither did Thomas Jefferson resurrection - nor did Jefferson believe in the virgin birth or the divinity of Christ.

LOL, Thomas Jerfferson's beliefs have around 0% to due with this article.

26 posted on 07/10/2004 12:33:54 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Destro
And you point is, what?

What the heck does Thomas Jefferson have to do with theology or these lame attacks on The Passion of the Christ?

That's almost "bunny with a pancake on its head"-worthy.

27 posted on 07/10/2004 12:35:51 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Neither did Thomas Jefferson resurrection - nor did Jefferson believe in the virgin birth or the divinity of Christ.

I didn't realize that Thomas Jefferson commented on the film....

28 posted on 07/10/2004 12:38:09 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (vote Democrat, it beats working for a living)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts; Destro
That's almost "bunny with a pancake on its head"-worthy.

Only almost?


29 posted on 07/10/2004 12:39:43 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (vote Democrat, it beats working for a living)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

LOL Thanks. I was looking for that picture, but couldn't find it.


30 posted on 07/10/2004 1:49:02 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Destro; american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp IV; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; ...
Gibson film based more on mysticism than gospels

Previously posted ....

'Passion' Follows the Scripture (Commentary by columnist for the Jewish Forward)

31 posted on 07/10/2004 2:50:32 PM PDT by NYer (When you have done something good, remember the words "without Me you can do nothing." (John 15:5).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Gee, I have all of the books about St. Emmerich. They are not contrary to the Gospel accounts.

Great books, I recommend them to everybody.

32 posted on 07/10/2004 3:05:34 PM PDT by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Kinda looks like Yashole Arafat.


33 posted on 07/10/2004 3:30:29 PM PDT by Robert Drobot (God, family, country. All else is meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Yeah, yeah, yeah... parts of it were "under-done". Like this one:

Isaiah 52 14 Just as there were many who were appalled at him- his appearance was so disfigured beyond that of any man and his form marred beyond human likeness-

Crossnan must be reading the "Good as New" Bible Bile. They still don't get it.

34 posted on 07/10/2004 5:18:01 PM PDT by Jaded (Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Mel Gibson brought Christianity back to a new high!
That liberal Godless twit can eat his heart out...If he
he has one.

                               
35 posted on 07/10/2004 5:42:34 PM PDT by Smartass ( BUSH & CHENEY IN 2004 - Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Well, Joseph Stalin renounced his early Christian upbringing and changed his name.

So Stalin trumps Jefferson.

(This is an exercise in YOUR logic, taken a step further.)


36 posted on 07/11/2004 11:49:06 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ninenot

I was asked why I posted this as if this kind of thinking is not part of being a conservative or a free thinker. I am also amused to think that so many are seemingly so weak of faith they can's stomach talk of this. Lastly, the discussion is in reality about a movie - nothing more or less important than a movie you eat popcorn to.


37 posted on 07/11/2004 2:28:22 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NYer

What kind of Mennonites would get involved with these people?


38 posted on 07/11/2004 8:03:56 PM PDT by steve8714
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
They are probably using the "international" method of dating - calendar day, month, year. So it would be 9 July 2004, which was this past day.

LOL! Of course, that didn't occur to me, but should have!

39 posted on 07/11/2004 9:17:58 PM PDT by ladyinred (What if the hokey pokey IS what it's all about? Become a monthly donor and find out!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nevski

"Liberals."

Excuse me, sir, but you failed to complete your sentence.

Please allow me.

"Liberals. Hock PaTOOey."


40 posted on 07/12/2004 9:20:54 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson