Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: gobucks
If you don't have a cultural reason to do it then the only other reasons are to either
A. Look the same as dad

or>

B. consider that some women don't really like the uncut version. Small consideration but it is still a consideration.

As far as cleanliness that just goes to parenting.

3 posted on 05/19/2005 5:51:50 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (You can turn your head away from the Berg video and still hear Al Queda's calls to prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig

Some women don't 'like' uncut version? I don't really know what to say about that; never heard anything about it. But that aside, thanks for the response..


5 posted on 05/19/2005 6:03:18 PM PDT by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/Laocoon.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
Orthodox Jewish women have a much lower rate of cervix cancer than those married to uncircumcised men.

While there is little difference among circumcised and uncircumcised men in reports of satisfaction with intercourse, women have a much higher rate of satisfaction when they have sex with circumcised men-- much like the guy who showers vs. the one who smells like a goat.

Circumcision is a whole lot less painful when done in infancy . . . and it puts the boy on track for giving his future wife the best sex she can get because circumcised men maintain better erections, longer erections and better and longer contact between the most sensitive part of the penis and the most sensitive part of his partner's vagina. As an added bonus, semen discarges are both fuller (quantity) and more complete (quality) much like a garden hose which is straight versus one which is kinked.

Circumcision is like the difference between fully naked, full contact sexual intercourse with the woman you love and a cheap poke inside the panties with a condom on and your testicles caught in your briefs. Forgive the graphic nature, but a sliding and sometimes uncooperative foreskin denies you both the full pleasure of fully nude, full contact sex-- breasts against breast, penis sliding back and forth freely inside your partner's vagina, testicles in contact with the outer lips of the female sexual orifice, hands against inner thighs, lips and tongues in full contact. Some of these contact points are, of course, possible with an intact foreskin, but all are not.

Is riding in a convertable with the roof down more sexy than riding in a boxy sedan with a leaky roof? Both will get you there, but only one does it in style.

Why do you think those who practice circumcision generally more fecund than those who do not?

20 posted on 05/19/2005 6:45:30 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig

We didn't circumcize our son, for those reasons -- most of the rest of the world doesn't; unanaesthesized/ pain, etc. He doesn't look like his Dad that way, but he does look like his Grandpa. He is 18, there have been no problems -- ie with his doctor growing up, etc. Would we NOT circumcize again? Probably.


129 posted on 05/19/2005 9:56:30 PM PDT by bboop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson