Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: TomSmedley
Nothing in the New Testament is said about a return to the land or a rebuilding of the temple.

I haven't read the article yet, but taking ONLY this in context, I disagree....

The WHOLE Bible is what we are to look at.

9 posted on 08/23/2005 12:40:27 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Lord, we need a Logan miracle for Simcha7 and Cowboy. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Brad's Gramma; TomSmedley
I haven't read the article yet, but taking ONLY this in context, I disagree....

His statement was, "Nothing in the New Testament is said about a return to the land or a rebuilding of the temple." That is true statement. With that you cannot disagree.

While Jesus and the apostles spoke about the destruction of the temple and the conquest of the land, they made no mention of any physical restoration. They didn't quote any of the OT prophecies so popular with dispensationalists as proving that the temple would be rebuilt, etc. The reason for this is obvious. Jesus is the true Israel, and His body, the church, is the true temple. They understood the true meaning of the OT prophecies as pointing to Jesus' finished work on behalf of His people (Luke 24:27).

12 posted on 08/23/2005 12:51:31 PM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Brad's Gramma
Nothing in the New Testament is said about a return to the land or a rebuilding of the temple.

I haven't read the article yet, but taking ONLY this in context, I disagree....

The WHOLE Bible is what we are to look at.

Where?

28 posted on 08/24/2005 9:42:30 AM PDT by Mister_Diddy_Wa_Diddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson