Yes, what is at post #20 is just ones man opinion, as I basically said, and it should not be taken as evidence that what the filmakers produced is bogus.
Nor should we take what you said in your opening line at #20 as more than mere opinion.
And lastly, anyone can see - by looking at the beginning of this thread to now - that I have an open mind concerning what the filmakers have rolled out.
Do you?
Do you?
Well, I haven't seen the film, so I wouldn't venture an opinion as to whether or not it communicates truth or lies. How about you? Have you seen the film?
Apparently the reviewer for the Seattle Times, disregarding the subject matter, thinks it is a boring film. Not a good piece of art.
Your post interested me in Mr. Calace and his experience as a film producer. Not the film itself. I started out searching the web for Mr. Calace's other work in film. Nothing else seemed to pop up in the first half dozen pages other than re-posts of the original press release from Silver Sword starting in 2004 and this lone film review.