Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope: may all Christians recognize true meaning of Peter’s primacy
AsiaNews ^ | 7 June, 2006

Posted on 06/07/2006 8:12:05 PM PDT by Petrosius

Benedict XVI talked about the primacy intended by Jesus and recognized by the apostles. He said a spontaneous prayer so that ?entrusted to poor human beings, the primacy may be always exercised in its original sense as desired by the Lord, that it may be recognized by our brothers not yet in full communion with us.

Vatican City (AsiaNews) – The foundation of the primacy of Peter in the desire manifested by Jesus and recognition by the Twelve, and spontaneous prayers so that “poor human beings” entrusted with the primacy will know how exercise it according to the will of Jesus, and so it may be recognized also by Christians who are not in full communion with Rome. This was the thrust of the words of Benedict XVI in today’s general audience.

Thus, Christian unity, indicated by Benedict XVI himself as being one of the fundamental objectives of his pontificate, accompanied his reflection on the “primacy”, described as a “constitutive element” of the Church, which has always posed one of the main – if not the main – obstacles to Christian unity unity. In this regard, John Paul II, in his encyclical “Ut Unum Sint” (1995), affirmed the openness of the Catholic Church to discussing not the primacy but concrete ways of exercising it. Today, Benedict XVI underlined that the task entrusted to Peter, is “to strengthen his brothers”. Off the cuff, he said: “This is the primacy given for all times: Peter must be the guardian of communion with Christ, lead to communion with Christ… with the charity of Christ, even to lead to the realization of this charity in everyday life.”

In his reflection, Benedict XVI today highlighted different aspects of the “primacy”: its institution by Christ, the awareness of Peter and recognition by the Twelve.

On this spring day, Benedict XVI addressed at least 40,000 people who packed into the square and brightened it up with colourful flags, hats, handkerchiefs, and even a few umbrellas to offer protection from the sun, already rather warm at times. The pope drew attention to the narrative of John about the first meeting of Jesus with Simon, brother of Andrew, saying “it records a singular fact: Jesus ‘looked at him and said, ‘You are Simon son of John. You are to be called Cephas’ (which is translated Peter)’ (Jn1:42). Jesus did not usually change the names of his disciples”, in fact, “He never gave a new name to any of his disciples. However he did so with Simon, and that name, translated in Greek as Petros, would crop up several times in the Gospels and would end up by replacing his original name. This fact takes on particular significance when one recalls that in the Old Testament, changing a name was usually a prelude to entrusting one with a mission (cfr Jn 17:5; 32:28ff). In fact, the intention of Christ to attribute special importance to Peter within the Apostolic College emerges in many instances: in Capernaum, the Teacher went to lodge in Peter’s house (Mk 1:29); when the crowd flocked to the banks of the lake of Gennesaret, Jesus chose Peter’s boat from the two moored there (Lk 5:3); when in particular circumstances, Jesus took three disciples to accompany him, only Peter is always recalled as the first of the group: the same happened in the resurrection of the daughter of Jairus (cfr Mk 5:37; Lk 8:51); in the Transfiguration (cfr Mk 9:2; Mt 17:1; Lk 9:28), during the agony in the Garden of Gethsemane (cfr Mk 14:33; Mt 16:37). And again: it was Peter who was approached by the tax collectors at the Temple and the Teacher paid for himself and for Peter alone (cfr Mt 17: 24-27); it was Peter whose feet He washed first at the Last Supper (cfr Jn 13:6) and it was only for him that He prayed so that his faith would not fail and that he may in turn strengthen his brothers (cfr Lk 22: 30-31)”.

“Peter himself is, after all, aware of his unique position: it is he who often, in the name also of the rest, speaks out, asking for an explanation for some difficult parable (Mt 15:15) or the exact meaning of a precept (Mt 18:21) or the formal promise of reward (Mt 19:27).”

Benedict XVI dwelt upon the “profession of faith which, again in the name of the Twelve, he made near Caesarea Philippi. To Jesus who asked: ‘Who do you say I am?’ Simon Peter answered, ‘You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God’ (Mt 16: 15-16). Jesus replies by making a solemn statement that defines, once and for all, the role of Peter in the Church: And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven’ (Mt 16:18-19). The three metaphors Jesus refers to are in themselves very clear: Peter will be the rock, the foundation on which the Church will stand; He will have the keys of the Kingdom of heaven to open or close as he sees fit; and finally, he will be able to bind or dissolve in the sense that he will be able to establish or prohibit as he holds necessary for the life of the Church, which is, and remains, of Christ”.

“This position of pre-eminence that Jesus meant to confer upon Peter is apparent also after the resurrection: Jesus charged the women to take the news to Peter, as distinct from the other Apostles (cfr Mk 16:7); it is to him and to John that Mary Magdalen rushes to inform them about the overturned stone at the entrance to the sepulchre (cfr Jn 20:2) and John allows Peter to go ahead when the two reach the empty tomb (cfr Jn 20:4-6); Peter would be the first among the Apostles to testify to an apparition of the Risen Lord (cfr Lk 24:34; 1 Cor 15:5). His role, decisively emphasized (cfr Jn 20:3-10), marks the continuity between his pre-eminence among the apostolic group and the pre-eminence he would continue to enjoy in the community born from the paschal events, as attested in the Book of the Acts (cfr 1:15-26; 2:14-40; 3:12-26; 4:8-12; 5:1-11.29; 8:14-17; 10; etc.). His behaviour is considered so decisive that it is the focus of observations and even of criticism (cfr At 11:1-18; Gal 2:11-14). Peter occupies a leadership role in the Council of Jerusalem (cfr At 15 and Gal 2:1-10) and it is precisely because of his being a witness to the authentic faith that Paul himself recognized in him a certain quality of “first” (cfr 1 Cor 15:5; Gal 1:18; 2:7ff; etc.). Further, the fact that all the key texts referring to Peter can be traced back to the context of the Last Supper, when Christ confers upon Peter the ministry of strengthening his brothers (cfr Lk 22:31ff), reveals how the Church born from the paschal memory celebrated in the Eucharist, finds one of its constitutive elements in the ministry entrusted to Peter.”

At the end of his reflection, Benedict XVI prayed, off the cuff, that the “primacy of Peter, entrusted to poor human beings, may be always exercised in its original sense as desired by the Lord, so that it may be recognized still more in its true meaning by our brothers as yet not in full communion with us.”



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ecumenism; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-226 next last
To: Theoden
Christians hold the Old Testament fulfilled, and do not hold it as being authoritative like we do the New Testament.

You might want to SERIOUSLY think about clarifying that statement, FRiend...

21 posted on 06/08/2006 6:41:53 AM PDT by markomalley (Vivat Iesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
Isaias 51

Give ear to me, you that follow that which is just, and you that seek the Lord: look unto the rock whence you are hewn, and to the hole of the pit from which you are dug out. 2 Look unto Abraham your father

* God called Abraham a rock

22 posted on 06/08/2006 6:45:31 AM PDT by bornacatholic (Pope Paul VI. "Use of the old Ordo Missae is in no way left to the choice of priests or people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius; american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
The Primacy of Peter
23 posted on 06/08/2006 7:02:42 AM PDT by NYer (Discover the beauty of the Eastern Catholic Churches - freepmail me for more information.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Theoden; Gamecock; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; suzyjaruki; Frumanchu
For the record,

121 The Old Testament is an indispensable part of Sacred Scripture. Its books are divinely inspired and retain a permanent value,92 for the Old Covenant has never been revoked.

122 Indeed, "the economy of the Old Testament was deliberately SO oriented that it should prepare for and declare in prophecy the coming of Christ, redeemer of all men."93 "Even though they contain matters imperfect and provisional,94 The books of the OldTestament bear witness to the whole divine pedagogy of God's saving love: these writings "are a storehouse of sublime teaching on God and of sound wisdom on human life, as well as a wonderful treasury of prayers; in them, too, the mystery of our salvation is present in a hidden way."95

123 Christians venerate the Old Testament as true Word of God. the Church has always vigorously opposed the idea of rejecting the Old Testament under the pretext that the New has rendered it void (Marcionism).

Just thought that needed to be clarified before it spins out of control.

24 posted on 06/08/2006 7:04:31 AM PDT by markomalley (Vivat Iesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
"And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven"

***************

Amen. Thank you, Pope Benedict for reminding us of this.

25 posted on 06/08/2006 7:08:29 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; Theoden; Gamecock; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; suzyjaruki; Frumanchu
Just thought that needed to be clarified before it spins out of control.

Much appreciated. To be fair to Theoden and Catholics in general, there are lots of Protestants, too, who hold to the same error - functionally, if not literally and openly. You can easily identify them by their shibboleth "but we're under grace now, not the law!"

All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness
- 1 Timothy 3:16

26 posted on 06/08/2006 7:26:42 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; suzyjaruki; Frumanchu

It was an honest question, and I don't mean to start a flame war here. You can just send me mail if you don't want this public. Actually, I should have sent that as a PM in the first place. My fault.


27 posted on 06/08/2006 7:46:12 AM PDT by Theoden (Why do you seek the cup of Christ, is it for his glory, or for yours?-Indiana Jones The Last Crusade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

I should not have phrased it like that in retrospect. I understand the importance of the Old Testament, that it IS the word of God, and that is divinely inspired, that not what I meant. What I was getting at was ONLY using the OT as a source of authority. That is what I don't understand.

I'm not as old as you guys, I haven't had the time to read up on it ;)


28 posted on 06/08/2006 7:57:21 AM PDT by Theoden (Why do you seek the cup of Christ, is it for his glory, or for yours?-Indiana Jones The Last Crusade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

...according to Catholic tradition.


29 posted on 06/08/2006 8:13:56 AM PDT by Kenny Bunkport (As the Democrat Party becomes more evil, the GOP becomes more stupid. What's a voter to do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic
Isaias 51

Give ear to me, you that follow that which is just,
and you that seek the Lord: look unto the rock whence you are hewn,
and to the hole of the pit from which you are dug out. 2 Look unto Abraham your father

* God called Abraham a rock

22 posted on 06/08/2006 7:45:31 AM MDT by bornacatholic

That is not my understanding.

I'm not sure how you arrived at that understanding.

b'shem Y'shua
30 posted on 06/08/2006 8:19:55 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Hosea 6:6 I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
then you are equating Christ with the servant, rather than the king (Hezekiah

I don't have a problem with it...Jesus is not YET the King...But He will be...

31 posted on 06/08/2006 8:41:14 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tenn2005; Iscool
Nice try guys, but you cannot run away from the clear words of our Lord. Do you not understand that by denying this that you are the ones who are violating sola scriptura and introducing human tradition by relying on your confessional interpretations that would move the meaning of our Lord's words from referring to Peter, whom He named 'Rock', to refer to only his confession. Nor do you address the institution of a unique office given to Peter by the conferral of the keys.
32 posted on 06/08/2006 8:46:39 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Jesus is not YET the King...But He will be...

Ohhhh boy. That's going to get a lot of responses!

33 posted on 06/08/2006 8:51:43 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport
...according to Catholic tradition.

Well, actually according to the words of our Lord himself. Or do you consider that the Gospel according to Matthew is only a part of Catholic tradition. Come to think about it, you have a point. We do only accept Matthew, and the rest of the New Testament, because it was given to us by Catholic tradition.

34 posted on 06/08/2006 8:52:07 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic

Isaiah...Verse 1, the reference to the rock is God...Verse 2, the reference is Abraham...


35 posted on 06/08/2006 8:53:43 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Theoden
The people who deny the Petrine Doctrine cannot see the forest through the trees, and choose to stay that way. Let them. One day, they will find out, as we all shall. If they want to constantly strain their eyes by being so tunnel visioned in the reading and interpreting of their edited, abridged, and mistranslated KJ Bibles, so what?

You are SO mistaken...We see what you see...But we want no part of it...

36 posted on 06/08/2006 8:55:59 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

In fact, if you take a look at the Aramaic of Matthew, you will discover that both instances of "Rock" in English are the word "Keepa" (IIRC on spelling...no time to look it up right now) -- thus the transliteration, Cephas, for Peter.

Many scholars (in fact most to my knowledge) believe that Matthew was originally written in Aramaic, btw.

Just thought I'd throw that one in the stew for consideration.

You can look for yourself at http://www.peshitta.org


37 posted on 06/08/2006 9:00:33 AM PDT by markomalley (Vivat Iesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Iscool; Theoden
I don't have a problem with it...

Thou sayest...

Oh, btw, FYI Matt 27:11 (KJV) "And Jesus stood before the governor: and the governor asked him, saying, Art thou the King of the Jews? And Jesus said unto him, Thou sayest."

Mark 15:2 (KJV) "And Pilate asked him, Art thou the King of the Jews? And he answering said unto him, Thou sayest [it]."

Luke 23:3 (KJV)"And Pilate asked him, saying, Art thou the King of the Jews? And he answered him and said, Thou sayest [it]."

You'll forgive me if I prefer the words of our Lord.

38 posted on 06/08/2006 9:08:00 AM PDT by markomalley (Vivat Iesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Theoden
I have a question for you.
Why do you constantly quote Old Testament when dealing with other Christians here?
Christians hold the Old Testament fulfilled,
and do not hold it as being authoritative like we do the New Testament.
One can interpret and quote Scripture into saying anything that they want it to say.
I am not being snide or anything like that,
I genuinely want to understand why it is that you still hold the Torah to be authoritative,
and yet are a Christian.
I do not understand the Messianic views.

Thanks

18 posted on 06/08/2006 7:34:14 AM MDT by Theoden

Y'shua is the "Word of G-d". Is He not?

All scripture that was quoted by Y'shua was from the Tanach.

Did Y'shua say ignore the Tanach? I don't think so.

Y'shua rebuked the Pharisees for ignoring the Tanach and using man-made Tradition instead.

I believe that Y'shua is the Mashiach as for-told in G-d's Holy Word: the Tanach.

b'shem Y'shua
39 posted on 06/08/2006 9:17:37 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Hosea 6:6 I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Iscool; Alex Murphy
Jesus is not YET the King...But He will be...

Friend, Jesus IS NOW the King. His Kingdom has been inaugurated. What we await is the full and final consumation of His Kingdom. He is on the throne, in complete control.

40 posted on 06/08/2006 9:24:26 AM PDT by Frumanchu (quod erat demonstrandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson