[wmfights]

"What is your interpretation of John 6:51-53?"
__________________________

I guess it's hard for you to stay on point. I think marajade gave the explanation before. I know it won't fit with your magestriums dictates, or your traditions, nonetheless it is a clear understanding of the SCRIPTURES.

This thread was about priests being married, or not, yet you keep trying to change the topic.

[dollars_for_dogma]

I guess it's hard for you to stay on point. I think marajade gave the explanation before. I know it won't fit with your magestriums dictates, or your traditions, nonetheless it is a clear understanding of the SCRIPTURES.

I was responding to your statement about my "tortured" interpretations of scripture...

Please...what is your "clear understanding of the scriptures"

...in regards to John 6:51-53?

Or..how about John 6:53-57?

[Jaded]

No, it's hard for you to stay on point because the thread is actually about women being priests. And here's the title:

Vatican opposes female clergy anywhere, gives reasons from Bible

Marajade made it about whatever struck her at the moment. Typically ignoring posts that differed from her personal interpretation of scripture.

[NYer]

This thread was about priests being married

Actually, this thread is about the ordination of women and the Vatican opposition to it.

[Campion]

This thread was about priests being married, or not, yet you keep trying to change the topic.

This thread was about the ordination of women. Marajade hijacked it into an anti-Catholic diatribe about married priests. But thanks for the effort at historical revisionism.